Abstract
Value-at-Risk, known as VaR, gives a prediction with a certain level of confidence of potential portfolio losses that may be encountered over a specified time period due to adverse price movements in the portfolio’s assets. For example, a VaR of 1 million dollars at the 95% level of confidence implies that overall portfolio losses should not exceed 1 million dollars more than 5% of the time over a given holding period. This research examines the effectiveness of VaR measures, developed using alternative estimation techniques, in predicting large losses in the cattle-feeding margin. Results show that several estimation techniques, both parametric and nonparametric, provide well-calibrated estimates of VaR such that violations (losses exceeding the VaR estimate) are commensurate with the desired level of confidence. In particular, estimates developed using the RiskMetrics™ method appear robust for instruments that have linear payoff structures such as cash commodity prices.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 333-353 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Agribusiness |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2001 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Food Science
- Geography, Planning and Development
- Animal Science and Zoology
- Agronomy and Crop Science
- Economics and Econometrics