Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population

Jonathan Stieglitz, Benjamin Trumble, Hillard Kaplan, Michael Gurven

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ultimate and proximate explanations of men’s physical intimate partner violence (IPV) against women have been proposed. An ultimate explanation posits that IPV is used to achieve a selfish fitness-relevant outcome, and predicts that IPV is associated with greater marital fertility. Proximate IPV explanations contain either complementary strategic components (for example, men’s desire for partner control), non-strategic components (for example, men’s self-regulatory failure), or both strategic and non-strategic components involving social learning. Consistent with an expectation from an ultimate IPV explanation, we find that IPV predicts greater marital fertility among Tsimané forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia (n = 133 marriages, 105 women). This result is robust to using between- versus within-subject comparisons, and considering secular changes, reverse causality, recall bias and other factors (for example, women’s preference for high-status men who may be more aggressive than lower-status men). Consistent with a complementary expectation from a strategic proximate IPV explanation, greater IPV rate is associated with men’s attitudes favouring intersexual control. Neither men’s propensity for intrasexual physical aggression, nor men’s or women’s childhood exposure to family violence predict IPV rate. Our results suggest a psychological and behavioural mechanism through which men exert direct influence over marital fertility, which may manifest when spouses differ in preferred family sizes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-572
Number of pages8
JournalNature Human Behaviour
Volume2
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2018

Fingerprint

Population Growth
Violence
Fertility
Bolivia
Intimate Partner Violence
Domestic Violence
Marriage
Aggression
Spouses
Causality
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population. / Stieglitz, Jonathan; Trumble, Benjamin; Kaplan, Hillard; Gurven, Michael.

In: Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 2, No. 8, 01.08.2018, p. 565-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalLetter

Stieglitz, Jonathan ; Trumble, Benjamin ; Kaplan, Hillard ; Gurven, Michael. / Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population. In: Nature Human Behaviour. 2018 ; Vol. 2, No. 8. pp. 565-572.
@article{3b6f065d5c2d409d96c6759d10c3b222,
title = "Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population",
abstract = "Ultimate and proximate explanations of men’s physical intimate partner violence (IPV) against women have been proposed. An ultimate explanation posits that IPV is used to achieve a selfish fitness-relevant outcome, and predicts that IPV is associated with greater marital fertility. Proximate IPV explanations contain either complementary strategic components (for example, men’s desire for partner control), non-strategic components (for example, men’s self-regulatory failure), or both strategic and non-strategic components involving social learning. Consistent with an expectation from an ultimate IPV explanation, we find that IPV predicts greater marital fertility among Tsiman{\'e} forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia (n = 133 marriages, 105 women). This result is robust to using between- versus within-subject comparisons, and considering secular changes, reverse causality, recall bias and other factors (for example, women’s preference for high-status men who may be more aggressive than lower-status men). Consistent with a complementary expectation from a strategic proximate IPV explanation, greater IPV rate is associated with men’s attitudes favouring intersexual control. Neither men’s propensity for intrasexual physical aggression, nor men’s or women’s childhood exposure to family violence predict IPV rate. Our results suggest a psychological and behavioural mechanism through which men exert direct influence over marital fertility, which may manifest when spouses differ in preferred family sizes.",
author = "Jonathan Stieglitz and Benjamin Trumble and Hillard Kaplan and Michael Gurven",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/s41562-018-0391-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "565--572",
journal = "Nature Human Behaviour",
issn = "2397-3374",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Marital violence and fertility in a relatively egalitarian high-fertility population

AU - Stieglitz, Jonathan

AU - Trumble, Benjamin

AU - Kaplan, Hillard

AU - Gurven, Michael

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Ultimate and proximate explanations of men’s physical intimate partner violence (IPV) against women have been proposed. An ultimate explanation posits that IPV is used to achieve a selfish fitness-relevant outcome, and predicts that IPV is associated with greater marital fertility. Proximate IPV explanations contain either complementary strategic components (for example, men’s desire for partner control), non-strategic components (for example, men’s self-regulatory failure), or both strategic and non-strategic components involving social learning. Consistent with an expectation from an ultimate IPV explanation, we find that IPV predicts greater marital fertility among Tsimané forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia (n = 133 marriages, 105 women). This result is robust to using between- versus within-subject comparisons, and considering secular changes, reverse causality, recall bias and other factors (for example, women’s preference for high-status men who may be more aggressive than lower-status men). Consistent with a complementary expectation from a strategic proximate IPV explanation, greater IPV rate is associated with men’s attitudes favouring intersexual control. Neither men’s propensity for intrasexual physical aggression, nor men’s or women’s childhood exposure to family violence predict IPV rate. Our results suggest a psychological and behavioural mechanism through which men exert direct influence over marital fertility, which may manifest when spouses differ in preferred family sizes.

AB - Ultimate and proximate explanations of men’s physical intimate partner violence (IPV) against women have been proposed. An ultimate explanation posits that IPV is used to achieve a selfish fitness-relevant outcome, and predicts that IPV is associated with greater marital fertility. Proximate IPV explanations contain either complementary strategic components (for example, men’s desire for partner control), non-strategic components (for example, men’s self-regulatory failure), or both strategic and non-strategic components involving social learning. Consistent with an expectation from an ultimate IPV explanation, we find that IPV predicts greater marital fertility among Tsimané forager-horticulturalists of Bolivia (n = 133 marriages, 105 women). This result is robust to using between- versus within-subject comparisons, and considering secular changes, reverse causality, recall bias and other factors (for example, women’s preference for high-status men who may be more aggressive than lower-status men). Consistent with a complementary expectation from a strategic proximate IPV explanation, greater IPV rate is associated with men’s attitudes favouring intersexual control. Neither men’s propensity for intrasexual physical aggression, nor men’s or women’s childhood exposure to family violence predict IPV rate. Our results suggest a psychological and behavioural mechanism through which men exert direct influence over marital fertility, which may manifest when spouses differ in preferred family sizes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052085013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052085013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41562-018-0391-7

DO - 10.1038/s41562-018-0391-7

M3 - Letter

C2 - 31058232

AN - SCOPUS:85052085013

VL - 2

SP - 565

EP - 572

JO - Nature Human Behaviour

JF - Nature Human Behaviour

SN - 2397-3374

IS - 8

ER -