Mapping Uncertainty in Conservation Assessment as a Means Toward Improved Conservation Planning and Implementation

John Gallo, Michael Goodchild

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Collaborative and community-based approaches to conservation and natural resource management often utilize maps that designate particular areas as being high priorities for conservation. These maps are used in stakeholder workshops and/or public discourse, but have often been highly contentious and counterproductive. We propose that quantifying and visualizing some of the uncertainty involved in making such maps could decrease their potential for causing conflict, thereby facilitating discourse and eventually, conservation action. We propose that an extra bonus could be attained by mapping the effects of missing or sparse input data regarding landowner "willingness to conserve" (given fair market compensation). The primary contributions of this action research are in the development of the propositions and in their implementation using a stochastic approach (Monte Carlo simulation). Preliminary assessment of the propositions occurred, but further research is needed to more formally evaluate them. Some practical suggestions and additional research considerations are provided.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-36
Number of pages15
JournalSociety and Natural Resources
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

conservation planning
conservation
uncertainty
planning
action research
discourse
landowner
natural resources
resource management
stakeholder
natural resource
simulation
market
management
community

Keywords

  • cartography
  • collaborative planning
  • land-use planning
  • opportunity cost
  • participatory GIS
  • PPGIS
  • resilience
  • systematic conservation planning
  • transparency
  • vision mapping
  • visualization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Development
  • Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Mapping Uncertainty in Conservation Assessment as a Means Toward Improved Conservation Planning and Implementation. / Gallo, John; Goodchild, Michael.

In: Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 22-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d858950eb81149129e4a45d8d9d95953,
title = "Mapping Uncertainty in Conservation Assessment as a Means Toward Improved Conservation Planning and Implementation",
abstract = "Collaborative and community-based approaches to conservation and natural resource management often utilize maps that designate particular areas as being high priorities for conservation. These maps are used in stakeholder workshops and/or public discourse, but have often been highly contentious and counterproductive. We propose that quantifying and visualizing some of the uncertainty involved in making such maps could decrease their potential for causing conflict, thereby facilitating discourse and eventually, conservation action. We propose that an extra bonus could be attained by mapping the effects of missing or sparse input data regarding landowner {"}willingness to conserve{"} (given fair market compensation). The primary contributions of this action research are in the development of the propositions and in their implementation using a stochastic approach (Monte Carlo simulation). Preliminary assessment of the propositions occurred, but further research is needed to more formally evaluate them. Some practical suggestions and additional research considerations are provided.",
keywords = "cartography, collaborative planning, land-use planning, opportunity cost, participatory GIS, PPGIS, resilience, systematic conservation planning, transparency, vision mapping, visualization",
author = "John Gallo and Michael Goodchild",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/08941920.2011.578119",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "22--36",
journal = "Society and Natural Resources",
issn = "0894-1920",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping Uncertainty in Conservation Assessment as a Means Toward Improved Conservation Planning and Implementation

AU - Gallo, John

AU - Goodchild, Michael

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Collaborative and community-based approaches to conservation and natural resource management often utilize maps that designate particular areas as being high priorities for conservation. These maps are used in stakeholder workshops and/or public discourse, but have often been highly contentious and counterproductive. We propose that quantifying and visualizing some of the uncertainty involved in making such maps could decrease their potential for causing conflict, thereby facilitating discourse and eventually, conservation action. We propose that an extra bonus could be attained by mapping the effects of missing or sparse input data regarding landowner "willingness to conserve" (given fair market compensation). The primary contributions of this action research are in the development of the propositions and in their implementation using a stochastic approach (Monte Carlo simulation). Preliminary assessment of the propositions occurred, but further research is needed to more formally evaluate them. Some practical suggestions and additional research considerations are provided.

AB - Collaborative and community-based approaches to conservation and natural resource management often utilize maps that designate particular areas as being high priorities for conservation. These maps are used in stakeholder workshops and/or public discourse, but have often been highly contentious and counterproductive. We propose that quantifying and visualizing some of the uncertainty involved in making such maps could decrease their potential for causing conflict, thereby facilitating discourse and eventually, conservation action. We propose that an extra bonus could be attained by mapping the effects of missing or sparse input data regarding landowner "willingness to conserve" (given fair market compensation). The primary contributions of this action research are in the development of the propositions and in their implementation using a stochastic approach (Monte Carlo simulation). Preliminary assessment of the propositions occurred, but further research is needed to more formally evaluate them. Some practical suggestions and additional research considerations are provided.

KW - cartography

KW - collaborative planning

KW - land-use planning

KW - opportunity cost

KW - participatory GIS

KW - PPGIS

KW - resilience

KW - systematic conservation planning

KW - transparency

KW - vision mapping

KW - visualization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870835257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84870835257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08941920.2011.578119

DO - 10.1080/08941920.2011.578119

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 22

EP - 36

JO - Society and Natural Resources

JF - Society and Natural Resources

SN - 0894-1920

IS - 1

ER -