Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations

Erik Fisher, Michael O'Rourke, Robert Evans, Eric B. Kennedy, Michael E. Gorman, Thomas Seager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Responsible innovation requires that scientific and other expert practices be responsive to society. We take stock of various collaborative approaches to socio-technical integration that seek to broaden the societal contexts technical experts take into account during their routine activities. Part of a larger family of engaged scholarship that includes inter- and transdisciplinarity as well as stakeholder and public engagement, we distinguish collaborative socio-technical integration in terms of its proximity to and transformation of expert practices. We survey a variety of approaches that differ widely in terms of their integrative methods, conceptions of societal context, roles, and aspirations for intervention. Taking a handful of “communities of integration” as exemplars, we then provide a framework for comparing the forms, means, and ends of collaborative integration. We conclude by reflecting on some of the main features of, and tensions within, this developing arena of practical inquiry and engagement and what this suggests for integrative efforts aimed at responsible innovation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-61
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Responsible Innovation
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2 2015

Fingerprint

Innovation
Conception
Public engagement
Transdisciplinarity
Stakeholder engagement
Proximity
Aspiration
Interdisciplinarity

Keywords

  • collaboration
  • public engagement
  • socio-technical integration
  • technology assessment
  • transdisciplinarity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Information Systems and Management

Cite this

Mapping the integrative field : taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. / Fisher, Erik; O'Rourke, Michael; Evans, Robert; Kennedy, Eric B.; Gorman, Michael E.; Seager, Thomas.

In: Journal of Responsible Innovation, Vol. 2, No. 1, 02.01.2015, p. 39-61.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fisher, Erik ; O'Rourke, Michael ; Evans, Robert ; Kennedy, Eric B. ; Gorman, Michael E. ; Seager, Thomas. / Mapping the integrative field : taking stock of socio-technical collaborations. In: Journal of Responsible Innovation. 2015 ; Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 39-61.
@article{1d45d23a399a4ea1b270a518d0d0e585,
title = "Mapping the integrative field: taking stock of socio-technical collaborations",
abstract = "Responsible innovation requires that scientific and other expert practices be responsive to society. We take stock of various collaborative approaches to socio-technical integration that seek to broaden the societal contexts technical experts take into account during their routine activities. Part of a larger family of engaged scholarship that includes inter- and transdisciplinarity as well as stakeholder and public engagement, we distinguish collaborative socio-technical integration in terms of its proximity to and transformation of expert practices. We survey a variety of approaches that differ widely in terms of their integrative methods, conceptions of societal context, roles, and aspirations for intervention. Taking a handful of “communities of integration” as exemplars, we then provide a framework for comparing the forms, means, and ends of collaborative integration. We conclude by reflecting on some of the main features of, and tensions within, this developing arena of practical inquiry and engagement and what this suggests for integrative efforts aimed at responsible innovation.",
keywords = "collaboration, public engagement, socio-technical integration, technology assessment, transdisciplinarity",
author = "Erik Fisher and Michael O'Rourke and Robert Evans and Kennedy, {Eric B.} and Gorman, {Michael E.} and Thomas Seager",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "39--61",
journal = "Journal of Responsible Innovation",
issn = "2329-9460",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the integrative field

T2 - taking stock of socio-technical collaborations

AU - Fisher, Erik

AU - O'Rourke, Michael

AU - Evans, Robert

AU - Kennedy, Eric B.

AU - Gorman, Michael E.

AU - Seager, Thomas

PY - 2015/1/2

Y1 - 2015/1/2

N2 - Responsible innovation requires that scientific and other expert practices be responsive to society. We take stock of various collaborative approaches to socio-technical integration that seek to broaden the societal contexts technical experts take into account during their routine activities. Part of a larger family of engaged scholarship that includes inter- and transdisciplinarity as well as stakeholder and public engagement, we distinguish collaborative socio-technical integration in terms of its proximity to and transformation of expert practices. We survey a variety of approaches that differ widely in terms of their integrative methods, conceptions of societal context, roles, and aspirations for intervention. Taking a handful of “communities of integration” as exemplars, we then provide a framework for comparing the forms, means, and ends of collaborative integration. We conclude by reflecting on some of the main features of, and tensions within, this developing arena of practical inquiry and engagement and what this suggests for integrative efforts aimed at responsible innovation.

AB - Responsible innovation requires that scientific and other expert practices be responsive to society. We take stock of various collaborative approaches to socio-technical integration that seek to broaden the societal contexts technical experts take into account during their routine activities. Part of a larger family of engaged scholarship that includes inter- and transdisciplinarity as well as stakeholder and public engagement, we distinguish collaborative socio-technical integration in terms of its proximity to and transformation of expert practices. We survey a variety of approaches that differ widely in terms of their integrative methods, conceptions of societal context, roles, and aspirations for intervention. Taking a handful of “communities of integration” as exemplars, we then provide a framework for comparing the forms, means, and ends of collaborative integration. We conclude by reflecting on some of the main features of, and tensions within, this developing arena of practical inquiry and engagement and what this suggests for integrative efforts aimed at responsible innovation.

KW - collaboration

KW - public engagement

KW - socio-technical integration

KW - technology assessment

KW - transdisciplinarity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014381480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014381480&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671

DO - 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85014381480

VL - 2

SP - 39

EP - 61

JO - Journal of Responsible Innovation

JF - Journal of Responsible Innovation

SN - 2329-9460

IS - 1

ER -