Mapping ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research

Michael J. Bernstein, Maria Del Mar Mancha-Cisneros, Madeline Tyson, Ute Brady, Cathy Alida Rubiños, Hoon Cheol Shin, Sechindra Vallury, Skaidra Smith-Heisters, Elicia Ratajczyk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the study of common-pool resource (CPR) governance, frameworks provide a metatheoretical language to describe system states, dynamics, elements, and relationships. The coding manuals which accompany CPR frame-works–in addition to providing guidelines for connecting empirical case work to conceptual variables–define a vocabulary of coding questions. For empirical work, connecting variables and coding questions with framework elements contributes to conceptual advance. In the process of analysis and publication, it is tempting to offer a novel framework without also developing, applying, or modifying the foundational questions and variables of coding manuals buttressing said frameworks. However, if the scholarly community is to generate robust knowledge for the study of CPR dilemmas, we must provide the underlying work of comparing across frameworks. In this paper, we report on one way the community might conduct such comparisons. We present results and challenges of using a group consensus process to link the more than 450 coding questions derived from the original Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IADF) to the recently proposed Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework (CISF). Despite overlap, discrepancies in the conceptual positions of the IADF and CISF suggest a need to modify or create new coding variables related to concepts of system boundaries, externalities, cross-scale interactions, multi-functionality, and technological change. We suggest that such work needs provisioning if commons scholars are to navigate the continued challenges of tailoring frameworks and coding manuals to evolving CPR governance dilemmas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)528-552
Number of pages25
JournalInternational Journal of the Commons
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

comparative research
coding
infrastructure
resources
governance
casework
technological change
functionality
community
vocabulary
interaction
language
Group

Keywords

  • Common-pool resources
  • CPR frameworks
  • CPR governance
  • Infrastructure
  • Institutional analysis and development framework
  • Qualitative coding methods
  • Research design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Mapping ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research. / Bernstein, Michael J.; Mancha-Cisneros, Maria Del Mar; Tyson, Madeline; Brady, Ute; Rubiños, Cathy Alida; Shin, Hoon Cheol; Vallury, Sechindra; Smith-Heisters, Skaidra; Ratajczyk, Elicia.

In: International Journal of the Commons, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 528-552.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bernstein, MJ, Mancha-Cisneros, MDM, Tyson, M, Brady, U, Rubiños, CA, Shin, HC, Vallury, S, Smith-Heisters, S & Ratajczyk, E 2019, 'Mapping ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research', International Journal of the Commons, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 528-552. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.904
Bernstein, Michael J. ; Mancha-Cisneros, Maria Del Mar ; Tyson, Madeline ; Brady, Ute ; Rubiños, Cathy Alida ; Shin, Hoon Cheol ; Vallury, Sechindra ; Smith-Heisters, Skaidra ; Ratajczyk, Elicia. / Mapping ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research. In: International Journal of the Commons. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 528-552.
@article{7091ff5038e848a3aaf503df2d763c3d,
title = "Mapping ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research",
abstract = "In the study of common-pool resource (CPR) governance, frameworks provide a metatheoretical language to describe system states, dynamics, elements, and relationships. The coding manuals which accompany CPR frame-works–in addition to providing guidelines for connecting empirical case work to conceptual variables–define a vocabulary of coding questions. For empirical work, connecting variables and coding questions with framework elements contributes to conceptual advance. In the process of analysis and publication, it is tempting to offer a novel framework without also developing, applying, or modifying the foundational questions and variables of coding manuals buttressing said frameworks. However, if the scholarly community is to generate robust knowledge for the study of CPR dilemmas, we must provide the underlying work of comparing across frameworks. In this paper, we report on one way the community might conduct such comparisons. We present results and challenges of using a group consensus process to link the more than 450 coding questions derived from the original Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IADF) to the recently proposed Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework (CISF). Despite overlap, discrepancies in the conceptual positions of the IADF and CISF suggest a need to modify or create new coding variables related to concepts of system boundaries, externalities, cross-scale interactions, multi-functionality, and technological change. We suggest that such work needs provisioning if commons scholars are to navigate the continued challenges of tailoring frameworks and coding manuals to evolving CPR governance dilemmas.",
keywords = "Common-pool resources, CPR frameworks, CPR governance, Infrastructure, Institutional analysis and development framework, Qualitative coding methods, Research design",
author = "Bernstein, {Michael J.} and Mancha-Cisneros, {Maria Del Mar} and Madeline Tyson and Ute Brady and Rubi{\~n}os, {Cathy Alida} and Shin, {Hoon Cheol} and Sechindra Vallury and Skaidra Smith-Heisters and Elicia Ratajczyk",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.18352/ijc.904",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "528--552",
journal = "International Journal of the Commons",
issn = "1875-0281",
publisher = "International Association for the Study of the Commons",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping ostrom’s common-pool resource systems coding handbook to the coupled infrastructure systems framework to enable comparative research

AU - Bernstein, Michael J.

AU - Mancha-Cisneros, Maria Del Mar

AU - Tyson, Madeline

AU - Brady, Ute

AU - Rubiños, Cathy Alida

AU - Shin, Hoon Cheol

AU - Vallury, Sechindra

AU - Smith-Heisters, Skaidra

AU - Ratajczyk, Elicia

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - In the study of common-pool resource (CPR) governance, frameworks provide a metatheoretical language to describe system states, dynamics, elements, and relationships. The coding manuals which accompany CPR frame-works–in addition to providing guidelines for connecting empirical case work to conceptual variables–define a vocabulary of coding questions. For empirical work, connecting variables and coding questions with framework elements contributes to conceptual advance. In the process of analysis and publication, it is tempting to offer a novel framework without also developing, applying, or modifying the foundational questions and variables of coding manuals buttressing said frameworks. However, if the scholarly community is to generate robust knowledge for the study of CPR dilemmas, we must provide the underlying work of comparing across frameworks. In this paper, we report on one way the community might conduct such comparisons. We present results and challenges of using a group consensus process to link the more than 450 coding questions derived from the original Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IADF) to the recently proposed Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework (CISF). Despite overlap, discrepancies in the conceptual positions of the IADF and CISF suggest a need to modify or create new coding variables related to concepts of system boundaries, externalities, cross-scale interactions, multi-functionality, and technological change. We suggest that such work needs provisioning if commons scholars are to navigate the continued challenges of tailoring frameworks and coding manuals to evolving CPR governance dilemmas.

AB - In the study of common-pool resource (CPR) governance, frameworks provide a metatheoretical language to describe system states, dynamics, elements, and relationships. The coding manuals which accompany CPR frame-works–in addition to providing guidelines for connecting empirical case work to conceptual variables–define a vocabulary of coding questions. For empirical work, connecting variables and coding questions with framework elements contributes to conceptual advance. In the process of analysis and publication, it is tempting to offer a novel framework without also developing, applying, or modifying the foundational questions and variables of coding manuals buttressing said frameworks. However, if the scholarly community is to generate robust knowledge for the study of CPR dilemmas, we must provide the underlying work of comparing across frameworks. In this paper, we report on one way the community might conduct such comparisons. We present results and challenges of using a group consensus process to link the more than 450 coding questions derived from the original Institutional Analysis and Development Framework (IADF) to the recently proposed Coupled Infrastructure Systems Framework (CISF). Despite overlap, discrepancies in the conceptual positions of the IADF and CISF suggest a need to modify or create new coding variables related to concepts of system boundaries, externalities, cross-scale interactions, multi-functionality, and technological change. We suggest that such work needs provisioning if commons scholars are to navigate the continued challenges of tailoring frameworks and coding manuals to evolving CPR governance dilemmas.

KW - Common-pool resources

KW - CPR frameworks

KW - CPR governance

KW - Infrastructure

KW - Institutional analysis and development framework

KW - Qualitative coding methods

KW - Research design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066810151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066810151&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.18352/ijc.904

DO - 10.18352/ijc.904

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85066810151

VL - 13

SP - 528

EP - 552

JO - International Journal of the Commons

JF - International Journal of the Commons

SN - 1875-0281

IS - 1

ER -