Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation

Ying Chih Chen, Matthew J. Benus, Jaclyn Hernandez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Argumentation is a core practice of science that inherently contains uncertainty. Relatively few studies have examined the role of uncertainty within argumentation and how teachers manage uncertainty leading to conceptual development. This design-based, multiple-case study employed the constant comparative method to analyze 24 videos focused on whole-class discussion, examining how two middle-school teachers created productive moments of uncertainty in an argumentative environment. Results showed that uncertainty in argumentation created productive moments for students to collaborate in dialogue and navigate their understanding of natural phenomena toward more coherent scientific explanations. Productively managing uncertainty was influenced by how the students’ epistemic understanding of argument was used as a resource to create a space to engage in social negotiation. Creating productive moments of uncertainty involved the teachers (a) raising uncertainty about an authentic, meaningful, and ambiguous phenomenon; (b) maintaining uncertainty through seeking the flaws, incoherences, and inconsistencies of an argument; and (c) reducing uncertainty by synthesizing and bridging what students had learned with what they were learning. As a resource, the epistemic understanding of argument is intertwined with the practice of social negotiation and depends both on the students’ degree of existing knowledge of dealing with uncertainty and the degree of their understanding of what counts as data, evidence, and reasoning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1235-1276
Number of pages42
JournalScience Education
Volume103
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

argumentation
uncertainty
Uncertainty
Argumentation
teacher
student
resources
video
dialogue

Keywords

  • argumentation
  • dialogue
  • epistemic understanding
  • managing uncertainty
  • social negotiation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. / Chen, Ying Chih; Benus, Matthew J.; Hernandez, Jaclyn.

In: Science Education, Vol. 103, No. 5, 01.01.2019, p. 1235-1276.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Chen, YC, Benus, MJ & Hernandez, J 2019, 'Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation', Science Education, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 1235-1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21527
Chen, Ying Chih ; Benus, Matthew J. ; Hernandez, Jaclyn. / Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation. In: Science Education. 2019 ; Vol. 103, No. 5. pp. 1235-1276.
@article{179a3477c8d148fab53ded3b0a90c0e8,
title = "Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation",
abstract = "Argumentation is a core practice of science that inherently contains uncertainty. Relatively few studies have examined the role of uncertainty within argumentation and how teachers manage uncertainty leading to conceptual development. This design-based, multiple-case study employed the constant comparative method to analyze 24 videos focused on whole-class discussion, examining how two middle-school teachers created productive moments of uncertainty in an argumentative environment. Results showed that uncertainty in argumentation created productive moments for students to collaborate in dialogue and navigate their understanding of natural phenomena toward more coherent scientific explanations. Productively managing uncertainty was influenced by how the students’ epistemic understanding of argument was used as a resource to create a space to engage in social negotiation. Creating productive moments of uncertainty involved the teachers (a) raising uncertainty about an authentic, meaningful, and ambiguous phenomenon; (b) maintaining uncertainty through seeking the flaws, incoherences, and inconsistencies of an argument; and (c) reducing uncertainty by synthesizing and bridging what students had learned with what they were learning. As a resource, the epistemic understanding of argument is intertwined with the practice of social negotiation and depends both on the students’ degree of existing knowledge of dealing with uncertainty and the degree of their understanding of what counts as data, evidence, and reasoning.",
keywords = "argumentation, dialogue, epistemic understanding, managing uncertainty, social negotiation",
author = "Chen, {Ying Chih} and Benus, {Matthew J.} and Jaclyn Hernandez",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/sce.21527",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "1235--1276",
journal = "Science Education",
issn = "0036-8326",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing uncertainty in scientific argumentation

AU - Chen, Ying Chih

AU - Benus, Matthew J.

AU - Hernandez, Jaclyn

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Argumentation is a core practice of science that inherently contains uncertainty. Relatively few studies have examined the role of uncertainty within argumentation and how teachers manage uncertainty leading to conceptual development. This design-based, multiple-case study employed the constant comparative method to analyze 24 videos focused on whole-class discussion, examining how two middle-school teachers created productive moments of uncertainty in an argumentative environment. Results showed that uncertainty in argumentation created productive moments for students to collaborate in dialogue and navigate their understanding of natural phenomena toward more coherent scientific explanations. Productively managing uncertainty was influenced by how the students’ epistemic understanding of argument was used as a resource to create a space to engage in social negotiation. Creating productive moments of uncertainty involved the teachers (a) raising uncertainty about an authentic, meaningful, and ambiguous phenomenon; (b) maintaining uncertainty through seeking the flaws, incoherences, and inconsistencies of an argument; and (c) reducing uncertainty by synthesizing and bridging what students had learned with what they were learning. As a resource, the epistemic understanding of argument is intertwined with the practice of social negotiation and depends both on the students’ degree of existing knowledge of dealing with uncertainty and the degree of their understanding of what counts as data, evidence, and reasoning.

AB - Argumentation is a core practice of science that inherently contains uncertainty. Relatively few studies have examined the role of uncertainty within argumentation and how teachers manage uncertainty leading to conceptual development. This design-based, multiple-case study employed the constant comparative method to analyze 24 videos focused on whole-class discussion, examining how two middle-school teachers created productive moments of uncertainty in an argumentative environment. Results showed that uncertainty in argumentation created productive moments for students to collaborate in dialogue and navigate their understanding of natural phenomena toward more coherent scientific explanations. Productively managing uncertainty was influenced by how the students’ epistemic understanding of argument was used as a resource to create a space to engage in social negotiation. Creating productive moments of uncertainty involved the teachers (a) raising uncertainty about an authentic, meaningful, and ambiguous phenomenon; (b) maintaining uncertainty through seeking the flaws, incoherences, and inconsistencies of an argument; and (c) reducing uncertainty by synthesizing and bridging what students had learned with what they were learning. As a resource, the epistemic understanding of argument is intertwined with the practice of social negotiation and depends both on the students’ degree of existing knowledge of dealing with uncertainty and the degree of their understanding of what counts as data, evidence, and reasoning.

KW - argumentation

KW - dialogue

KW - epistemic understanding

KW - managing uncertainty

KW - social negotiation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070853929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070853929&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/sce.21527

DO - 10.1002/sce.21527

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070853929

VL - 103

SP - 1235

EP - 1276

JO - Science Education

JF - Science Education

SN - 0036-8326

IS - 5

ER -