Managing radical software engineering: Leverage order and chaos

Kevin C. Desouza, Yukika Awazu, Jeffrey Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Innovations in software engineering organisations frequently emerge from risky behaviour. Most often, these risks are taken by only a small percentage of the software engineers practising radical engineering (REs). They go against the status quo, experiment with new methods or technologies, and have the burden of bringing the innovations into the mainstream of the organisation. Most organisations however, do a poor job of adequately and effectively managing radical engineers. In this paper, we analyse the relationship between innovation regimes and radical engineering practice. We find that REs can be practised at either end of the order-chaos continuum. Successful software organisations are those that are able to balance between the extremes and manage REs effectively, and also those that follow a series of innovation stages in sensible ways. In this paper, we discuss lessons learned in managing REs found in software organisations and propose organisational actions for effective innovation management.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-40
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Technology, Policy and Management
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Chaos theory
Software engineering
Innovation
Engineers
Chaos
Leverage
Software
Experiments

Keywords

  • Articulation
  • Frame of interpretation
  • Incentives
  • Innovation
  • Innovation regimes
  • Knowledge management
  • Knowledge workers
  • Software development
  • Software organisations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Managing radical software engineering : Leverage order and chaos. / Desouza, Kevin C.; Awazu, Yukika; Kim, Jeffrey.

In: International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2008, p. 22-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Desouza, Kevin C. ; Awazu, Yukika ; Kim, Jeffrey. / Managing radical software engineering : Leverage order and chaos. In: International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management. 2008 ; Vol. 8, No. 1. pp. 22-40.
@article{d9ae1eaf70f241848c0190100dcb0d37,
title = "Managing radical software engineering: Leverage order and chaos",
abstract = "Innovations in software engineering organisations frequently emerge from risky behaviour. Most often, these risks are taken by only a small percentage of the software engineers practising radical engineering (REs). They go against the status quo, experiment with new methods or technologies, and have the burden of bringing the innovations into the mainstream of the organisation. Most organisations however, do a poor job of adequately and effectively managing radical engineers. In this paper, we analyse the relationship between innovation regimes and radical engineering practice. We find that REs can be practised at either end of the order-chaos continuum. Successful software organisations are those that are able to balance between the extremes and manage REs effectively, and also those that follow a series of innovation stages in sensible ways. In this paper, we discuss lessons learned in managing REs found in software organisations and propose organisational actions for effective innovation management.",
keywords = "Articulation, Frame of interpretation, Incentives, Innovation, Innovation regimes, Knowledge management, Knowledge workers, Software development, Software organisations",
author = "Desouza, {Kevin C.} and Yukika Awazu and Jeffrey Kim",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1504/IJTPM.2008.016179",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "22--40",
journal = "International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management",
issn = "1468-4322",
publisher = "Inderscience Enterprises Ltd",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing radical software engineering

T2 - Leverage order and chaos

AU - Desouza, Kevin C.

AU - Awazu, Yukika

AU - Kim, Jeffrey

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Innovations in software engineering organisations frequently emerge from risky behaviour. Most often, these risks are taken by only a small percentage of the software engineers practising radical engineering (REs). They go against the status quo, experiment with new methods or technologies, and have the burden of bringing the innovations into the mainstream of the organisation. Most organisations however, do a poor job of adequately and effectively managing radical engineers. In this paper, we analyse the relationship between innovation regimes and radical engineering practice. We find that REs can be practised at either end of the order-chaos continuum. Successful software organisations are those that are able to balance between the extremes and manage REs effectively, and also those that follow a series of innovation stages in sensible ways. In this paper, we discuss lessons learned in managing REs found in software organisations and propose organisational actions for effective innovation management.

AB - Innovations in software engineering organisations frequently emerge from risky behaviour. Most often, these risks are taken by only a small percentage of the software engineers practising radical engineering (REs). They go against the status quo, experiment with new methods or technologies, and have the burden of bringing the innovations into the mainstream of the organisation. Most organisations however, do a poor job of adequately and effectively managing radical engineers. In this paper, we analyse the relationship between innovation regimes and radical engineering practice. We find that REs can be practised at either end of the order-chaos continuum. Successful software organisations are those that are able to balance between the extremes and manage REs effectively, and also those that follow a series of innovation stages in sensible ways. In this paper, we discuss lessons learned in managing REs found in software organisations and propose organisational actions for effective innovation management.

KW - Articulation

KW - Frame of interpretation

KW - Incentives

KW - Innovation

KW - Innovation regimes

KW - Knowledge management

KW - Knowledge workers

KW - Software development

KW - Software organisations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37849006767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37849006767&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1504/IJTPM.2008.016179

DO - 10.1504/IJTPM.2008.016179

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:37849006767

VL - 8

SP - 22

EP - 40

JO - International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management

JF - International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management

SN - 1468-4322

IS - 1

ER -