Making philosophical progress: The big questions, applied philosophy, and the profession

Elizabeth Brake

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The debate over whether philosophy makes progress has focused on its failure to answer a core set of "big" questions. I argue that there are other kinds of philosophical progress which are equally important yet underappreciated: the creative development of new "philosophical devices" which increase our ability to think about the world, and the broadening of philosophical topics to ever greater adequacy to what matters. The conception of philosophy as defined by a narrow "core" set of questions is responsible for skepticism about progress, as well as for philosophy's "marketing problem" - its failure to reach the general public. I argue for abandoning the distinction between "core" and "marginal" questions. The greater openness of philosophy to methodological diversity and diversity in topics, especially applied topics, will make a distinct kind of progress: in the breadth and completeness of the questions asked, phenomena investigated, and theories generated. Such openness may also make philosophy more hospitable to more diverse practitioners. This would also be conducive to progress, in the sense of reaching true answers to philosophical questions: greater diversity of philosophical practitioners has epistemic benefits, such as increasing objectivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-45
Number of pages23
JournalSocial Philosophy and Policy
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

profession
objectivity
marketing
philosophy
Applied philosophy
Philosophy
ability
Openness

Keywords

  • Applied philosophy
  • Diversity
  • Epistemic justice
  • Feminist epistemology
  • Meta-philosophy
  • Objectivity
  • Progress

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Making philosophical progress : The big questions, applied philosophy, and the profession. / Brake, Elizabeth.

In: Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 34, No. 2, 01.01.2017, p. 23-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c8a92319e6a247efa40b2d5251233d01,
title = "Making philosophical progress: The big questions, applied philosophy, and the profession",
abstract = "The debate over whether philosophy makes progress has focused on its failure to answer a core set of {"}big{"} questions. I argue that there are other kinds of philosophical progress which are equally important yet underappreciated: the creative development of new {"}philosophical devices{"} which increase our ability to think about the world, and the broadening of philosophical topics to ever greater adequacy to what matters. The conception of philosophy as defined by a narrow {"}core{"} set of questions is responsible for skepticism about progress, as well as for philosophy's {"}marketing problem{"} - its failure to reach the general public. I argue for abandoning the distinction between {"}core{"} and {"}marginal{"} questions. The greater openness of philosophy to methodological diversity and diversity in topics, especially applied topics, will make a distinct kind of progress: in the breadth and completeness of the questions asked, phenomena investigated, and theories generated. Such openness may also make philosophy more hospitable to more diverse practitioners. This would also be conducive to progress, in the sense of reaching true answers to philosophical questions: greater diversity of philosophical practitioners has epistemic benefits, such as increasing objectivity.",
keywords = "Applied philosophy, Diversity, Epistemic justice, Feminist epistemology, Meta-philosophy, Objectivity, Progress",
author = "Elizabeth Brake",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S026505251700019X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "23--45",
journal = "Social Philosophy and Policy",
issn = "0265-0525",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making philosophical progress

T2 - The big questions, applied philosophy, and the profession

AU - Brake, Elizabeth

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - The debate over whether philosophy makes progress has focused on its failure to answer a core set of "big" questions. I argue that there are other kinds of philosophical progress which are equally important yet underappreciated: the creative development of new "philosophical devices" which increase our ability to think about the world, and the broadening of philosophical topics to ever greater adequacy to what matters. The conception of philosophy as defined by a narrow "core" set of questions is responsible for skepticism about progress, as well as for philosophy's "marketing problem" - its failure to reach the general public. I argue for abandoning the distinction between "core" and "marginal" questions. The greater openness of philosophy to methodological diversity and diversity in topics, especially applied topics, will make a distinct kind of progress: in the breadth and completeness of the questions asked, phenomena investigated, and theories generated. Such openness may also make philosophy more hospitable to more diverse practitioners. This would also be conducive to progress, in the sense of reaching true answers to philosophical questions: greater diversity of philosophical practitioners has epistemic benefits, such as increasing objectivity.

AB - The debate over whether philosophy makes progress has focused on its failure to answer a core set of "big" questions. I argue that there are other kinds of philosophical progress which are equally important yet underappreciated: the creative development of new "philosophical devices" which increase our ability to think about the world, and the broadening of philosophical topics to ever greater adequacy to what matters. The conception of philosophy as defined by a narrow "core" set of questions is responsible for skepticism about progress, as well as for philosophy's "marketing problem" - its failure to reach the general public. I argue for abandoning the distinction between "core" and "marginal" questions. The greater openness of philosophy to methodological diversity and diversity in topics, especially applied topics, will make a distinct kind of progress: in the breadth and completeness of the questions asked, phenomena investigated, and theories generated. Such openness may also make philosophy more hospitable to more diverse practitioners. This would also be conducive to progress, in the sense of reaching true answers to philosophical questions: greater diversity of philosophical practitioners has epistemic benefits, such as increasing objectivity.

KW - Applied philosophy

KW - Diversity

KW - Epistemic justice

KW - Feminist epistemology

KW - Meta-philosophy

KW - Objectivity

KW - Progress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041810752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041810752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S026505251700019X

DO - 10.1017/S026505251700019X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85041810752

VL - 34

SP - 23

EP - 45

JO - Social Philosophy and Policy

JF - Social Philosophy and Policy

SN - 0265-0525

IS - 2

ER -