Making Claims that Matter: Heuristics for Theoretical and Social Impact in Qualitative Research

Tim Huffman, Sarah Tracy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholar activists draw on a variety of theoretical, methodological, and practical tools for creating and sustaining social justice. We argue that data analysis—in addition to research design, participation, and community engagement—can be leveraged to engage in scholarship for social good. This essay contributes to that effort by offering a set of data analytic heuristic devices for qualitative researchers. These heuristic devices include community cocktail party, conjecturing claims, Jeopardy research questions, phronetic claims, carrying claims, and tightening claims. We outline each heuristic device’s use, purpose, underlying philosophical commitments, and how it aids analytic thinking that serves the pursuit of justice. Using these devices provides opportunities for making claims that matter and strengthening the impact of qualitative research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)558-570
Number of pages13
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume24
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

social effects
qualitative research
heuristics
social justice
research planning
community
justice
commitment
participation

Keywords

  • grounded theory
  • methodologies
  • methods of inquiry
  • participatory action research
  • pragmatism
  • qualitative research
  • social justice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Making Claims that Matter : Heuristics for Theoretical and Social Impact in Qualitative Research. / Huffman, Tim; Tracy, Sarah.

In: Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 24, No. 8, 01.10.2018, p. 558-570.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b16537578406450f873afc48ef9a55a9,
title = "Making Claims that Matter: Heuristics for Theoretical and Social Impact in Qualitative Research",
abstract = "Scholar activists draw on a variety of theoretical, methodological, and practical tools for creating and sustaining social justice. We argue that data analysis—in addition to research design, participation, and community engagement—can be leveraged to engage in scholarship for social good. This essay contributes to that effort by offering a set of data analytic heuristic devices for qualitative researchers. These heuristic devices include community cocktail party, conjecturing claims, Jeopardy research questions, phronetic claims, carrying claims, and tightening claims. We outline each heuristic device’s use, purpose, underlying philosophical commitments, and how it aids analytic thinking that serves the pursuit of justice. Using these devices provides opportunities for making claims that matter and strengthening the impact of qualitative research.",
keywords = "grounded theory, methodologies, methods of inquiry, participatory action research, pragmatism, qualitative research, social justice",
author = "Tim Huffman and Sarah Tracy",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077800417742411",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "558--570",
journal = "Qualitative Inquiry",
issn = "1077-8004",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Making Claims that Matter

T2 - Heuristics for Theoretical and Social Impact in Qualitative Research

AU - Huffman, Tim

AU - Tracy, Sarah

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Scholar activists draw on a variety of theoretical, methodological, and practical tools for creating and sustaining social justice. We argue that data analysis—in addition to research design, participation, and community engagement—can be leveraged to engage in scholarship for social good. This essay contributes to that effort by offering a set of data analytic heuristic devices for qualitative researchers. These heuristic devices include community cocktail party, conjecturing claims, Jeopardy research questions, phronetic claims, carrying claims, and tightening claims. We outline each heuristic device’s use, purpose, underlying philosophical commitments, and how it aids analytic thinking that serves the pursuit of justice. Using these devices provides opportunities for making claims that matter and strengthening the impact of qualitative research.

AB - Scholar activists draw on a variety of theoretical, methodological, and practical tools for creating and sustaining social justice. We argue that data analysis—in addition to research design, participation, and community engagement—can be leveraged to engage in scholarship for social good. This essay contributes to that effort by offering a set of data analytic heuristic devices for qualitative researchers. These heuristic devices include community cocktail party, conjecturing claims, Jeopardy research questions, phronetic claims, carrying claims, and tightening claims. We outline each heuristic device’s use, purpose, underlying philosophical commitments, and how it aids analytic thinking that serves the pursuit of justice. Using these devices provides opportunities for making claims that matter and strengthening the impact of qualitative research.

KW - grounded theory

KW - methodologies

KW - methods of inquiry

KW - participatory action research

KW - pragmatism

KW - qualitative research

KW - social justice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053625416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053625416&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077800417742411

DO - 10.1177/1077800417742411

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053625416

VL - 24

SP - 558

EP - 570

JO - Qualitative Inquiry

JF - Qualitative Inquiry

SN - 1077-8004

IS - 8

ER -