Magnesium isotopic compositions of the Mesoproterozoic dolostones: Implications for Mg isotopic systematics of marine carbonates

Kang Jun Huang, Bing Shen, Xian Guo Lang, Wenbo Tang, Yang Peng, Shan Ke, Alan J. Kaufman, Hao Ran Ma, Fang Bing Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Available Mg isotope data indicate that dolostones of different ages have overlapping range of Mg isotopic composition (δ26Mg) and there is no systematic difference among different types of dolomites. To further explore the Mg isotopic systematics of dolomite formation, we measured Mg isotopic compositions of Mesoproterozoic dolostones from the Wumishan Formation in North China Block, because dolomite formation in Mesoproterozoic might have been fundamentally different from the younger counterparts. Based on petrographic observations, three texturally-different dolomite phases (dolomicrite, subhedral dolomite and anhedral dolomite) are recognized in the Wumishan dolostones. Nevertheless, these three types of dolomites have similar δ26Mg values, ranging from -1.35‰ to -1.72‰, which are indistinguishable from Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic dolostones. To explain δ26Mg values of dolostones, we simulate the Mg isotopic system during dolomite formation by applying the one-dimensional Diffusion-Advection-Reaction (1D-DAR) model, assuming that the contemporaneous seawater is the Mg source of dolostone. The 1D-DAR modeling results indicate that the degree of dolomitization is controlled by sedimentation rate, seawater Mg concentration, temperature, and reaction rate of dolomite formation, whereas Mg isotopic composition of dolostone is not only dependent on these factors, but also affected by δ26Mg of seawater and isotope fractionation during dolomite formation. Moreover, the 1D-DAR model predicts that dolomite formation within sediments has limited range of variation in δ26Mg with respect to limestones. Furthermore, the modeling results demonstrate that dolostone is always isotopically heavier than Ca-carbonate precipitated from seawater, explaining the systematic isotopic difference between dolostones and limestones. Finally, we can infer from the 1D-DAR model that early-formed dolostone at shallower depth of sediments is always isotopically lighter than that formed in deeper sediments, suggesting the potential application of Mg isotope as a proxy for constraining dolostone formation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)333-351
Number of pages19
JournalGeochimica et Cosmochimica Acta
Volume164
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

dolostone
Carbonates
Magnesium
dolomite
magnesium
isotopic composition
carbonate
Chemical analysis
Seawater
Isotopes
seawater
Sediments
Calcium Carbonate
isotope
limestone
sediment
dolomitization
Advection
Fractionation
Phanerozoic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geochemistry and Petrology

Cite this

Magnesium isotopic compositions of the Mesoproterozoic dolostones : Implications for Mg isotopic systematics of marine carbonates. / Huang, Kang Jun; Shen, Bing; Lang, Xian Guo; Tang, Wenbo; Peng, Yang; Ke, Shan; Kaufman, Alan J.; Ma, Hao Ran; Li, Fang Bing.

In: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol. 164, 01.09.2015, p. 333-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Huang, Kang Jun ; Shen, Bing ; Lang, Xian Guo ; Tang, Wenbo ; Peng, Yang ; Ke, Shan ; Kaufman, Alan J. ; Ma, Hao Ran ; Li, Fang Bing. / Magnesium isotopic compositions of the Mesoproterozoic dolostones : Implications for Mg isotopic systematics of marine carbonates. In: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 2015 ; Vol. 164. pp. 333-351.
@article{ffbd35dee9bf45079e87e8ffff04678d,
title = "Magnesium isotopic compositions of the Mesoproterozoic dolostones: Implications for Mg isotopic systematics of marine carbonates",
abstract = "Available Mg isotope data indicate that dolostones of different ages have overlapping range of Mg isotopic composition (δ26Mg) and there is no systematic difference among different types of dolomites. To further explore the Mg isotopic systematics of dolomite formation, we measured Mg isotopic compositions of Mesoproterozoic dolostones from the Wumishan Formation in North China Block, because dolomite formation in Mesoproterozoic might have been fundamentally different from the younger counterparts. Based on petrographic observations, three texturally-different dolomite phases (dolomicrite, subhedral dolomite and anhedral dolomite) are recognized in the Wumishan dolostones. Nevertheless, these three types of dolomites have similar δ26Mg values, ranging from -1.35‰ to -1.72‰, which are indistinguishable from Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic dolostones. To explain δ26Mg values of dolostones, we simulate the Mg isotopic system during dolomite formation by applying the one-dimensional Diffusion-Advection-Reaction (1D-DAR) model, assuming that the contemporaneous seawater is the Mg source of dolostone. The 1D-DAR modeling results indicate that the degree of dolomitization is controlled by sedimentation rate, seawater Mg concentration, temperature, and reaction rate of dolomite formation, whereas Mg isotopic composition of dolostone is not only dependent on these factors, but also affected by δ26Mg of seawater and isotope fractionation during dolomite formation. Moreover, the 1D-DAR model predicts that dolomite formation within sediments has limited range of variation in δ26Mg with respect to limestones. Furthermore, the modeling results demonstrate that dolostone is always isotopically heavier than Ca-carbonate precipitated from seawater, explaining the systematic isotopic difference between dolostones and limestones. Finally, we can infer from the 1D-DAR model that early-formed dolostone at shallower depth of sediments is always isotopically lighter than that formed in deeper sediments, suggesting the potential application of Mg isotope as a proxy for constraining dolostone formation.",
author = "Huang, {Kang Jun} and Bing Shen and Lang, {Xian Guo} and Wenbo Tang and Yang Peng and Shan Ke and Kaufman, {Alan J.} and Ma, {Hao Ran} and Li, {Fang Bing}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "164",
pages = "333--351",
journal = "Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta",
issn = "0016-7037",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Magnesium isotopic compositions of the Mesoproterozoic dolostones

T2 - Implications for Mg isotopic systematics of marine carbonates

AU - Huang, Kang Jun

AU - Shen, Bing

AU - Lang, Xian Guo

AU - Tang, Wenbo

AU - Peng, Yang

AU - Ke, Shan

AU - Kaufman, Alan J.

AU - Ma, Hao Ran

AU - Li, Fang Bing

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Available Mg isotope data indicate that dolostones of different ages have overlapping range of Mg isotopic composition (δ26Mg) and there is no systematic difference among different types of dolomites. To further explore the Mg isotopic systematics of dolomite formation, we measured Mg isotopic compositions of Mesoproterozoic dolostones from the Wumishan Formation in North China Block, because dolomite formation in Mesoproterozoic might have been fundamentally different from the younger counterparts. Based on petrographic observations, three texturally-different dolomite phases (dolomicrite, subhedral dolomite and anhedral dolomite) are recognized in the Wumishan dolostones. Nevertheless, these three types of dolomites have similar δ26Mg values, ranging from -1.35‰ to -1.72‰, which are indistinguishable from Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic dolostones. To explain δ26Mg values of dolostones, we simulate the Mg isotopic system during dolomite formation by applying the one-dimensional Diffusion-Advection-Reaction (1D-DAR) model, assuming that the contemporaneous seawater is the Mg source of dolostone. The 1D-DAR modeling results indicate that the degree of dolomitization is controlled by sedimentation rate, seawater Mg concentration, temperature, and reaction rate of dolomite formation, whereas Mg isotopic composition of dolostone is not only dependent on these factors, but also affected by δ26Mg of seawater and isotope fractionation during dolomite formation. Moreover, the 1D-DAR model predicts that dolomite formation within sediments has limited range of variation in δ26Mg with respect to limestones. Furthermore, the modeling results demonstrate that dolostone is always isotopically heavier than Ca-carbonate precipitated from seawater, explaining the systematic isotopic difference between dolostones and limestones. Finally, we can infer from the 1D-DAR model that early-formed dolostone at shallower depth of sediments is always isotopically lighter than that formed in deeper sediments, suggesting the potential application of Mg isotope as a proxy for constraining dolostone formation.

AB - Available Mg isotope data indicate that dolostones of different ages have overlapping range of Mg isotopic composition (δ26Mg) and there is no systematic difference among different types of dolomites. To further explore the Mg isotopic systematics of dolomite formation, we measured Mg isotopic compositions of Mesoproterozoic dolostones from the Wumishan Formation in North China Block, because dolomite formation in Mesoproterozoic might have been fundamentally different from the younger counterparts. Based on petrographic observations, three texturally-different dolomite phases (dolomicrite, subhedral dolomite and anhedral dolomite) are recognized in the Wumishan dolostones. Nevertheless, these three types of dolomites have similar δ26Mg values, ranging from -1.35‰ to -1.72‰, which are indistinguishable from Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic dolostones. To explain δ26Mg values of dolostones, we simulate the Mg isotopic system during dolomite formation by applying the one-dimensional Diffusion-Advection-Reaction (1D-DAR) model, assuming that the contemporaneous seawater is the Mg source of dolostone. The 1D-DAR modeling results indicate that the degree of dolomitization is controlled by sedimentation rate, seawater Mg concentration, temperature, and reaction rate of dolomite formation, whereas Mg isotopic composition of dolostone is not only dependent on these factors, but also affected by δ26Mg of seawater and isotope fractionation during dolomite formation. Moreover, the 1D-DAR model predicts that dolomite formation within sediments has limited range of variation in δ26Mg with respect to limestones. Furthermore, the modeling results demonstrate that dolostone is always isotopically heavier than Ca-carbonate precipitated from seawater, explaining the systematic isotopic difference between dolostones and limestones. Finally, we can infer from the 1D-DAR model that early-formed dolostone at shallower depth of sediments is always isotopically lighter than that formed in deeper sediments, suggesting the potential application of Mg isotope as a proxy for constraining dolostone formation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931267290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931267290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.gca.2015.05.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84931267290

VL - 164

SP - 333

EP - 351

JO - Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta

JF - Geochmica et Cosmochimica Acta

SN - 0016-7037

ER -