TY - JOUR
T1 - Macro interventions and their influence on individual and community well-being
AU - Ferguson-Colvin, Kristin
AU - Teixeira, Samantha
AU - Wernick, Laura J.
AU - Burghardt, Steve
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Funding for the Social Enterprise Intervention pilot study was provided by the Larson Endowment for Innovative Research at the USC School of Social Work. The Participatory Photo Mapping project was supported with funding from the Albert Schweitzer Environmental Fellowship. The Riot Youth study was supported in part by the Arcus Foundation, Liberty Hill Foundation, Mukti Fund, University of Michigan Arts of Citizenship Program, and the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan. The community partnership training/coaching program was funded by NYC ACS.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2018.
PY - 2018/11/1
Y1 - 2018/11/1
N2 - Summary: Due to the focus of micro-practice interventions on clinical outcomes and macro-practice interventions on structural outcomes, limited research exists on the clinical benefits resulting from clients’ involvement in macro therapeutic interventions (i.e. structural interventions that target community, organizational, systems, and/or policy-level change and which also have clinical benefits to clients or consumers). In response to this knowledge gap, the authors present four case studies of macro therapeutic interventions in the areas of social enterprise creation, community-based participatory research, transformative organizing, and community-based partnerships. Findings: Collectively, these interventions draw from community, economic, and social development theory, empowerment theory, feminist theory, and critical theory. The authors synthesize the key intervention components across case studies that contribute to clinical and collective empowerment outcomes. Applications: The authors then offer recommendations to the social work profession for developing, implementing, and evaluating macro therapeutic interventions within clinical practice settings.
AB - Summary: Due to the focus of micro-practice interventions on clinical outcomes and macro-practice interventions on structural outcomes, limited research exists on the clinical benefits resulting from clients’ involvement in macro therapeutic interventions (i.e. structural interventions that target community, organizational, systems, and/or policy-level change and which also have clinical benefits to clients or consumers). In response to this knowledge gap, the authors present four case studies of macro therapeutic interventions in the areas of social enterprise creation, community-based participatory research, transformative organizing, and community-based partnerships. Findings: Collectively, these interventions draw from community, economic, and social development theory, empowerment theory, feminist theory, and critical theory. The authors synthesize the key intervention components across case studies that contribute to clinical and collective empowerment outcomes. Applications: The authors then offer recommendations to the social work profession for developing, implementing, and evaluating macro therapeutic interventions within clinical practice settings.
KW - Social work
KW - community-based participatory research
KW - community-based partnership
KW - macro therapeutic interventions
KW - social enterprise
KW - transformative organizing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042068216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042068216&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1468017318757160
DO - 10.1177/1468017318757160
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85042068216
SN - 1468-0173
VL - 18
SP - 679
EP - 702
JO - Journal of Social Work
JF - Journal of Social Work
IS - 6
ER -