Abstract

Case studies suggest that ethnic groups with autonomous institutional arrangements are more prone to secede, but other evidence indicates that autonomy reduces the likelihood of secession. To address this debate, we disaggregate their autonomy status into three categories—currently autonomous, never autonomous, and lost autonomy—and then unpack how each shapes the logic of collective action. We argue groups that were never autonomous are unlikely to mobilize due to a lack of collective action capacity, whereas currently autonomous groups may have the capacity but often lack the motivation. Most important, groups that have lost autonomy often possess both strong incentives and the capacity to pursue secession, which facilitates collective action. Moreover, autonomy retraction weakens the government’s ability to make future credible commitments to redress grievances. We test these conjectures with data on the autonomous status and separatist behavior of 324 groups in more than 100 countries from 1960 to 2000. Our analysis shows clear empirical results regarding the relationship between autonomy status and separatism. Most notably, we find that formerly autonomous groups are the most likely to secede, and that both currently autonomous and never autonomous groups are much less likely.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-34
Number of pages32
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 12 2015

Fingerprint

separatism
nationalism
autonomy
collective behavior
secession
Group
lack
ethnic group
incentive
commitment
ability
evidence

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • decentralization
  • nationalism
  • separatism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Lost Autonomy, Nationalism and Separatism. / Siroky, David; Cuffe, John.

In: Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 48, No. 1, 12.01.2015, p. 3-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Siroky, David ; Cuffe, John. / Lost Autonomy, Nationalism and Separatism. In: Comparative Political Studies. 2015 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 3-34.
@article{b73acf40f689489c8b878ae1e4000d21,
title = "Lost Autonomy, Nationalism and Separatism",
abstract = "Case studies suggest that ethnic groups with autonomous institutional arrangements are more prone to secede, but other evidence indicates that autonomy reduces the likelihood of secession. To address this debate, we disaggregate their autonomy status into three categories—currently autonomous, never autonomous, and lost autonomy—and then unpack how each shapes the logic of collective action. We argue groups that were never autonomous are unlikely to mobilize due to a lack of collective action capacity, whereas currently autonomous groups may have the capacity but often lack the motivation. Most important, groups that have lost autonomy often possess both strong incentives and the capacity to pursue secession, which facilitates collective action. Moreover, autonomy retraction weakens the government’s ability to make future credible commitments to redress grievances. We test these conjectures with data on the autonomous status and separatist behavior of 324 groups in more than 100 countries from 1960 to 2000. Our analysis shows clear empirical results regarding the relationship between autonomy status and separatism. Most notably, we find that formerly autonomous groups are the most likely to secede, and that both currently autonomous and never autonomous groups are much less likely.",
keywords = "autonomy, decentralization, nationalism, separatism",
author = "David Siroky and John Cuffe",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1177/0010414013516927",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "3--34",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lost Autonomy, Nationalism and Separatism

AU - Siroky, David

AU - Cuffe, John

PY - 2015/1/12

Y1 - 2015/1/12

N2 - Case studies suggest that ethnic groups with autonomous institutional arrangements are more prone to secede, but other evidence indicates that autonomy reduces the likelihood of secession. To address this debate, we disaggregate their autonomy status into three categories—currently autonomous, never autonomous, and lost autonomy—and then unpack how each shapes the logic of collective action. We argue groups that were never autonomous are unlikely to mobilize due to a lack of collective action capacity, whereas currently autonomous groups may have the capacity but often lack the motivation. Most important, groups that have lost autonomy often possess both strong incentives and the capacity to pursue secession, which facilitates collective action. Moreover, autonomy retraction weakens the government’s ability to make future credible commitments to redress grievances. We test these conjectures with data on the autonomous status and separatist behavior of 324 groups in more than 100 countries from 1960 to 2000. Our analysis shows clear empirical results regarding the relationship between autonomy status and separatism. Most notably, we find that formerly autonomous groups are the most likely to secede, and that both currently autonomous and never autonomous groups are much less likely.

AB - Case studies suggest that ethnic groups with autonomous institutional arrangements are more prone to secede, but other evidence indicates that autonomy reduces the likelihood of secession. To address this debate, we disaggregate their autonomy status into three categories—currently autonomous, never autonomous, and lost autonomy—and then unpack how each shapes the logic of collective action. We argue groups that were never autonomous are unlikely to mobilize due to a lack of collective action capacity, whereas currently autonomous groups may have the capacity but often lack the motivation. Most important, groups that have lost autonomy often possess both strong incentives and the capacity to pursue secession, which facilitates collective action. Moreover, autonomy retraction weakens the government’s ability to make future credible commitments to redress grievances. We test these conjectures with data on the autonomous status and separatist behavior of 324 groups in more than 100 countries from 1960 to 2000. Our analysis shows clear empirical results regarding the relationship between autonomy status and separatism. Most notably, we find that formerly autonomous groups are the most likely to secede, and that both currently autonomous and never autonomous groups are much less likely.

KW - autonomy

KW - decentralization

KW - nationalism

KW - separatism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84915818801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84915818801&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414013516927

DO - 10.1177/0010414013516927

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 3

EP - 34

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

IS - 1

ER -