Abstract
This study assesses the prediction and prediction uncertainty performance of models that cater for both: (i) a nonstationary relationship between the response and a contextual variable and (ii) a nonstationary residual variance (or variogram), at point locations for a single realisation spatial process. Here the crucial aspect of the model specification is allowing the residual variance (or variogram) to vary across space. Without this, the estimated prediction standard errors are only likely to be accurate in a global (or overall) sense and not the desired, local sense. Locally-accurate prediction standard errors, allow locally-relevant prediction confidence intervals and/or locally-relevant estimates of risk (e.g. the risk of exceeding some critical threshold) which is not only valuable to researchers who attempt to model spatial processes, but also to policy makers who need to plan and manage the outcomes of spatial processes at different spatial scales.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Accuracy 2010 - Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences |
Publisher | International Spatial Accuracy Research Association (ISARA) |
Pages | 137-140 |
Number of pages | 4 |
State | Published - 2010 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | 9th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Accuracy 2010 - Leicester, United Kingdom Duration: Jul 20 2010 → Jul 23 2010 |
Other
Other | 9th International Symposium on Spatial Accuracy Assessment in Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences, Accuracy 2010 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
City | Leicester |
Period | 7/20/10 → 7/23/10 |
Keywords
- Bayesian prediction models
- Georaphically weighted regression
- Heteroskedastic
- Moving window kriging
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Science(all)