Lithic reduction, its measurement, and implications: Comments on the volume

Michael J. Shott, Margaret Nelson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Some years ago one of us wrote, “A glance at a chipped stone tool is enough to see that stone is a subtractive medium” (Shott 1994: 69). The statement bordered on a truism but was worth making in any event. Flakes, the small pieces of stone struck from larger objective pieces, were the subject then; the context was their abundance and diversity as generated in the production, use, and resharpening of tools. Flake analysis makes no sense without understanding the places that flakes occupy in the reduction process. But the reductive quality of stone also informs the analysis of objective pieces themselves, not least finished tools. Accordingly, tools also are a legitimate subject of reduction studies. A deceptively profound truism worth stating once is worth rephrasing: a glance at a chipped stone tool is enough to see that it was reduced from a larger piece. But the restatement itself requires elaboration. Trivially, tools were reduced from larger objective pieces in the process of production. No one has doubted this since archaeologists demonstrated human agency in the production of stone tools. Yet many tools were further retouched by resharpening, and so continued to experience reduction during use. This is the “reduction thesis” (Shott 2005), which archaeologists did not always appreciate in the past. This book is a milestone in the development of reduction analysis. Originating in pioneering studies such as Hoffman's (1985), until recently reduction analysis was conducted in isolation by few archaeologists.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationLithic Technology
Subtitle of host publicationMeasures of Production, Use, and Curation
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages23-46
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9780511499661
ISBN (Print)9780521888271
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Lithic reduction, its measurement, and implications: Comments on the volume'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Shott, M. J., & Nelson, M. (2008). Lithic reduction, its measurement, and implications: Comments on the volume. In Lithic Technology: Measures of Production, Use, and Curation (pp. 23-46). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499661.003