Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S

Josep Padullés Cubino, Meghan L. Avolio, Megan M. Wheeler, Kelli L. Larson, Sarah E. Hobbie, Jeannine Cavender-Bares, Sharon J. Hall, Kristen C. Nelson, Tara L.E. Trammell, Christopher Neill, Diane E. Pataki, J. Morgan Grove, Peter M. Groffman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Residential yards contribute to human well-being and urban biodiversity. The structure, diversity, and composition of yard floras are largely determined by personal choices and landscaping priorities at local scales, but it is unclear whether these relationships hold across broader geographical areas. We investigated the relationship between homeowners’ criteria for vegetation and yard management choices, ecosystem-service based traits, and yard plant diversity (i.e., taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional) in 145 yards distributed across 6 major cities in the U.S. Individual priorities for a set of ecosystem services were collected with closed-ended questions and reduced into four main principal components using factor analyses: natural, neat, showy and low cost. Across cities, priorities for neat yards were negatively related to overall and spontaneous species richness. Priorities for showy yards were positively related to yard aesthetics (based on showiness of flowers, fruits and leaves for component plants) and spontaneous species richness. Homeowners that preferred low-cost yards had a significantly higher proportion of exotics, and yards with significantly lower functional diversity (i.e., a composite measure for plant height, seed mass, and specific leaf area). The proportion of natives was not related to homeowners’ priorities for natural yards and phylogenetic diversity was only weakly and negatively related to priorities for showy yards. Our study corroborates previous research showing that homeowners’ landscaping priorities are only partially related to their yard vegetation at the continental scale. The disconnection might be attributed to broader institutional, structural, and ecological constraints that prevent people's personal ideals and priorities from being realized.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103730
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume196
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2020

Fingerprint

homeowner
ecosystem service
species richness
phylogenetics
vegetation
esthetics
cost
leaf area
flower
flora
fruit
biodiversity
seed
city

Keywords

  • Domestic gardens
  • Ecosystem services
  • Human values
  • Plant biodiversity
  • Socio-ecological systems
  • Urban ecology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

Padullés Cubino, J., Avolio, M. L., Wheeler, M. M., Larson, K. L., Hobbie, S. E., Cavender-Bares, J., ... Groffman, P. M. (2020). Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S. Landscape and Urban Planning, 196, [103730]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103730

Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S. / Padullés Cubino, Josep; Avolio, Meghan L.; Wheeler, Megan M.; Larson, Kelli L.; Hobbie, Sarah E.; Cavender-Bares, Jeannine; Hall, Sharon J.; Nelson, Kristen C.; Trammell, Tara L.E.; Neill, Christopher; Pataki, Diane E.; Grove, J. Morgan; Groffman, Peter M.

In: Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 196, 103730, 04.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Padullés Cubino, J, Avolio, ML, Wheeler, MM, Larson, KL, Hobbie, SE, Cavender-Bares, J, Hall, SJ, Nelson, KC, Trammell, TLE, Neill, C, Pataki, DE, Grove, JM & Groffman, PM 2020, 'Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S', Landscape and Urban Planning, vol. 196, 103730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103730
Padullés Cubino, Josep ; Avolio, Meghan L. ; Wheeler, Megan M. ; Larson, Kelli L. ; Hobbie, Sarah E. ; Cavender-Bares, Jeannine ; Hall, Sharon J. ; Nelson, Kristen C. ; Trammell, Tara L.E. ; Neill, Christopher ; Pataki, Diane E. ; Grove, J. Morgan ; Groffman, Peter M. / Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S. In: Landscape and Urban Planning. 2020 ; Vol. 196.
@article{63837bfe538a43f1b55fd5874c22a8d9,
title = "Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S",
abstract = "Residential yards contribute to human well-being and urban biodiversity. The structure, diversity, and composition of yard floras are largely determined by personal choices and landscaping priorities at local scales, but it is unclear whether these relationships hold across broader geographical areas. We investigated the relationship between homeowners’ criteria for vegetation and yard management choices, ecosystem-service based traits, and yard plant diversity (i.e., taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional) in 145 yards distributed across 6 major cities in the U.S. Individual priorities for a set of ecosystem services were collected with closed-ended questions and reduced into four main principal components using factor analyses: natural, neat, showy and low cost. Across cities, priorities for neat yards were negatively related to overall and spontaneous species richness. Priorities for showy yards were positively related to yard aesthetics (based on showiness of flowers, fruits and leaves for component plants) and spontaneous species richness. Homeowners that preferred low-cost yards had a significantly higher proportion of exotics, and yards with significantly lower functional diversity (i.e., a composite measure for plant height, seed mass, and specific leaf area). The proportion of natives was not related to homeowners’ priorities for natural yards and phylogenetic diversity was only weakly and negatively related to priorities for showy yards. Our study corroborates previous research showing that homeowners’ landscaping priorities are only partially related to their yard vegetation at the continental scale. The disconnection might be attributed to broader institutional, structural, and ecological constraints that prevent people's personal ideals and priorities from being realized.",
keywords = "Domestic gardens, Ecosystem services, Human values, Plant biodiversity, Socio-ecological systems, Urban ecology",
author = "{Padull{\'e}s Cubino}, Josep and Avolio, {Meghan L.} and Wheeler, {Megan M.} and Larson, {Kelli L.} and Hobbie, {Sarah E.} and Jeannine Cavender-Bares and Hall, {Sharon J.} and Nelson, {Kristen C.} and Trammell, {Tara L.E.} and Christopher Neill and Pataki, {Diane E.} and Grove, {J. Morgan} and Groffman, {Peter M.}",
year = "2020",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103730",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "196",
journal = "Landscape and Urban Planning",
issn = "0169-2046",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking yard plant diversity to homeowners’ landscaping priorities across the U.S

AU - Padullés Cubino, Josep

AU - Avolio, Meghan L.

AU - Wheeler, Megan M.

AU - Larson, Kelli L.

AU - Hobbie, Sarah E.

AU - Cavender-Bares, Jeannine

AU - Hall, Sharon J.

AU - Nelson, Kristen C.

AU - Trammell, Tara L.E.

AU - Neill, Christopher

AU - Pataki, Diane E.

AU - Grove, J. Morgan

AU - Groffman, Peter M.

PY - 2020/4

Y1 - 2020/4

N2 - Residential yards contribute to human well-being and urban biodiversity. The structure, diversity, and composition of yard floras are largely determined by personal choices and landscaping priorities at local scales, but it is unclear whether these relationships hold across broader geographical areas. We investigated the relationship between homeowners’ criteria for vegetation and yard management choices, ecosystem-service based traits, and yard plant diversity (i.e., taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional) in 145 yards distributed across 6 major cities in the U.S. Individual priorities for a set of ecosystem services were collected with closed-ended questions and reduced into four main principal components using factor analyses: natural, neat, showy and low cost. Across cities, priorities for neat yards were negatively related to overall and spontaneous species richness. Priorities for showy yards were positively related to yard aesthetics (based on showiness of flowers, fruits and leaves for component plants) and spontaneous species richness. Homeowners that preferred low-cost yards had a significantly higher proportion of exotics, and yards with significantly lower functional diversity (i.e., a composite measure for plant height, seed mass, and specific leaf area). The proportion of natives was not related to homeowners’ priorities for natural yards and phylogenetic diversity was only weakly and negatively related to priorities for showy yards. Our study corroborates previous research showing that homeowners’ landscaping priorities are only partially related to their yard vegetation at the continental scale. The disconnection might be attributed to broader institutional, structural, and ecological constraints that prevent people's personal ideals and priorities from being realized.

AB - Residential yards contribute to human well-being and urban biodiversity. The structure, diversity, and composition of yard floras are largely determined by personal choices and landscaping priorities at local scales, but it is unclear whether these relationships hold across broader geographical areas. We investigated the relationship between homeowners’ criteria for vegetation and yard management choices, ecosystem-service based traits, and yard plant diversity (i.e., taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional) in 145 yards distributed across 6 major cities in the U.S. Individual priorities for a set of ecosystem services were collected with closed-ended questions and reduced into four main principal components using factor analyses: natural, neat, showy and low cost. Across cities, priorities for neat yards were negatively related to overall and spontaneous species richness. Priorities for showy yards were positively related to yard aesthetics (based on showiness of flowers, fruits and leaves for component plants) and spontaneous species richness. Homeowners that preferred low-cost yards had a significantly higher proportion of exotics, and yards with significantly lower functional diversity (i.e., a composite measure for plant height, seed mass, and specific leaf area). The proportion of natives was not related to homeowners’ priorities for natural yards and phylogenetic diversity was only weakly and negatively related to priorities for showy yards. Our study corroborates previous research showing that homeowners’ landscaping priorities are only partially related to their yard vegetation at the continental scale. The disconnection might be attributed to broader institutional, structural, and ecological constraints that prevent people's personal ideals and priorities from being realized.

KW - Domestic gardens

KW - Ecosystem services

KW - Human values

KW - Plant biodiversity

KW - Socio-ecological systems

KW - Urban ecology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076716323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076716323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103730

DO - 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103730

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85076716323

VL - 196

JO - Landscape and Urban Planning

JF - Landscape and Urban Planning

SN - 0169-2046

M1 - 103730

ER -