Abstract

Robustness and resilience are concepts in systems thinking that have grown in importance and popularity. For many complex social-ecological systems, however, robustness and resilience are difficult to quantify and the connections and trade-offs between them difficult to study. Most studies have either focused on qualitative approaches to discuss their connections or considered only one of them under particular classes of disturbances. In this study, we present an analytical framework to address the linkage between robustness and resilience more systematically. Our analysis is based on a stylized dynamical model that operationalizes a widely used conceptual framework for social-ecological systems. The model enables us to rigorously delineate the boundaries of conditions under which the coupled system can be sustained in a long run, define robustness and resilience related to these boundaries, and consequently investigate their connections. The results reveal the trade-offs between robustness and resilience. They also show how the nature of such trade-offs varies with the choice of certain policies (e.g., taxation and investment in public infrastructure), internal stresses, and uncertainty in social-ecological settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1159-1168
Number of pages10
JournalEarth System Dynamics
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 5 2018

Fingerprint

infrastructure
analytical framework
conceptual framework
disturbance
analysis
taxation
policy
public

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

Linking resilience and robustness and uncovering their trade-offs in coupled infrastructure systems. / Homayounfar, Mehran; Muneepeerakul, Rachata; Anderies, John; Muneepeerakul, Chitsomanus P.

In: Earth System Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 4, 05.10.2018, p. 1159-1168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Homayounfar, Mehran ; Muneepeerakul, Rachata ; Anderies, John ; Muneepeerakul, Chitsomanus P. / Linking resilience and robustness and uncovering their trade-offs in coupled infrastructure systems. In: Earth System Dynamics. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 1159-1168.
@article{a1825415fc824786a40d430ab2e9a3c5,
title = "Linking resilience and robustness and uncovering their trade-offs in coupled infrastructure systems",
abstract = "Robustness and resilience are concepts in systems thinking that have grown in importance and popularity. For many complex social-ecological systems, however, robustness and resilience are difficult to quantify and the connections and trade-offs between them difficult to study. Most studies have either focused on qualitative approaches to discuss their connections or considered only one of them under particular classes of disturbances. In this study, we present an analytical framework to address the linkage between robustness and resilience more systematically. Our analysis is based on a stylized dynamical model that operationalizes a widely used conceptual framework for social-ecological systems. The model enables us to rigorously delineate the boundaries of conditions under which the coupled system can be sustained in a long run, define robustness and resilience related to these boundaries, and consequently investigate their connections. The results reveal the trade-offs between robustness and resilience. They also show how the nature of such trade-offs varies with the choice of certain policies (e.g., taxation and investment in public infrastructure), internal stresses, and uncertainty in social-ecological settings.",
author = "Mehran Homayounfar and Rachata Muneepeerakul and John Anderies and Muneepeerakul, {Chitsomanus P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "5",
doi = "10.5194/esd-9-1159-2018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "1159--1168",
journal = "Earth System Dynamics",
issn = "2190-4979",
publisher = "Copernicus Gesellschaft mbH",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking resilience and robustness and uncovering their trade-offs in coupled infrastructure systems

AU - Homayounfar, Mehran

AU - Muneepeerakul, Rachata

AU - Anderies, John

AU - Muneepeerakul, Chitsomanus P.

PY - 2018/10/5

Y1 - 2018/10/5

N2 - Robustness and resilience are concepts in systems thinking that have grown in importance and popularity. For many complex social-ecological systems, however, robustness and resilience are difficult to quantify and the connections and trade-offs between them difficult to study. Most studies have either focused on qualitative approaches to discuss their connections or considered only one of them under particular classes of disturbances. In this study, we present an analytical framework to address the linkage between robustness and resilience more systematically. Our analysis is based on a stylized dynamical model that operationalizes a widely used conceptual framework for social-ecological systems. The model enables us to rigorously delineate the boundaries of conditions under which the coupled system can be sustained in a long run, define robustness and resilience related to these boundaries, and consequently investigate their connections. The results reveal the trade-offs between robustness and resilience. They also show how the nature of such trade-offs varies with the choice of certain policies (e.g., taxation and investment in public infrastructure), internal stresses, and uncertainty in social-ecological settings.

AB - Robustness and resilience are concepts in systems thinking that have grown in importance and popularity. For many complex social-ecological systems, however, robustness and resilience are difficult to quantify and the connections and trade-offs between them difficult to study. Most studies have either focused on qualitative approaches to discuss their connections or considered only one of them under particular classes of disturbances. In this study, we present an analytical framework to address the linkage between robustness and resilience more systematically. Our analysis is based on a stylized dynamical model that operationalizes a widely used conceptual framework for social-ecological systems. The model enables us to rigorously delineate the boundaries of conditions under which the coupled system can be sustained in a long run, define robustness and resilience related to these boundaries, and consequently investigate their connections. The results reveal the trade-offs between robustness and resilience. They also show how the nature of such trade-offs varies with the choice of certain policies (e.g., taxation and investment in public infrastructure), internal stresses, and uncertainty in social-ecological settings.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054522745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054522745&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5194/esd-9-1159-2018

DO - 10.5194/esd-9-1159-2018

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 1159

EP - 1168

JO - Earth System Dynamics

JF - Earth System Dynamics

SN - 2190-4979

IS - 4

ER -