Limitations of evidence-based practice for social work education: Unpacking the complexity

Kathryn Betts Adams, Holly C. Matto, Craig Lecroy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although some academic scholars have called for adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) as a unifying model for social work education and practice, controversies with the EBP approach for the social work profession still need to be examined. Some of the limitations of EBP to be recognized and addressed before recommending broad changes within social work education are described. Conceptual and definitional limitations include following a medical model, privileging certain types of evidence, and downplaying the importance of theory. Implementation and feasibility limitations include sorting the complexity of research information and providing necessary practice grounding and supervision to facilitate knowledge application. Dialogue on the role of EBP in social work education must continue.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)165-186
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Social Work Education
Volume45
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2009

Fingerprint

social work
evidence
education
supervision
profession
dialogue
knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Limitations of evidence-based practice for social work education : Unpacking the complexity. / Adams, Kathryn Betts; Matto, Holly C.; Lecroy, Craig.

In: Journal of Social Work Education, Vol. 45, No. 2, 03.2009, p. 165-186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d8443c3009c94c0db6254cd388116899,
title = "Limitations of evidence-based practice for social work education: Unpacking the complexity",
abstract = "Although some academic scholars have called for adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) as a unifying model for social work education and practice, controversies with the EBP approach for the social work profession still need to be examined. Some of the limitations of EBP to be recognized and addressed before recommending broad changes within social work education are described. Conceptual and definitional limitations include following a medical model, privileging certain types of evidence, and downplaying the importance of theory. Implementation and feasibility limitations include sorting the complexity of research information and providing necessary practice grounding and supervision to facilitate knowledge application. Dialogue on the role of EBP in social work education must continue.",
author = "Adams, {Kathryn Betts} and Matto, {Holly C.} and Craig Lecroy",
year = "2009",
month = "3",
doi = "10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700105",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "165--186",
journal = "Journal of Social Work Education",
issn = "1043-7797",
publisher = "Council on Social Work Education",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Limitations of evidence-based practice for social work education

T2 - Unpacking the complexity

AU - Adams, Kathryn Betts

AU - Matto, Holly C.

AU - Lecroy, Craig

PY - 2009/3

Y1 - 2009/3

N2 - Although some academic scholars have called for adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) as a unifying model for social work education and practice, controversies with the EBP approach for the social work profession still need to be examined. Some of the limitations of EBP to be recognized and addressed before recommending broad changes within social work education are described. Conceptual and definitional limitations include following a medical model, privileging certain types of evidence, and downplaying the importance of theory. Implementation and feasibility limitations include sorting the complexity of research information and providing necessary practice grounding and supervision to facilitate knowledge application. Dialogue on the role of EBP in social work education must continue.

AB - Although some academic scholars have called for adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) as a unifying model for social work education and practice, controversies with the EBP approach for the social work profession still need to be examined. Some of the limitations of EBP to be recognized and addressed before recommending broad changes within social work education are described. Conceptual and definitional limitations include following a medical model, privileging certain types of evidence, and downplaying the importance of theory. Implementation and feasibility limitations include sorting the complexity of research information and providing necessary practice grounding and supervision to facilitate knowledge application. Dialogue on the role of EBP in social work education must continue.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349207217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70349207217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700105

DO - 10.5175/JSWE.2009.200700105

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349207217

VL - 45

SP - 165

EP - 186

JO - Journal of Social Work Education

JF - Journal of Social Work Education

SN - 1043-7797

IS - 2

ER -