Liberal states and print media coverage of global advocacy events: The case of the un Beijing conference for women

Carol Mueller, Salvatore J. Restifo, Julie Fox Restifo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

UN conferences and summits have played a critical role in bringing local activists' claims to international audiences. One might assume that UN conferences, like other fora of "information politics," rely on the global media to convey advocates' messages. Yet, extensive research on U.S. media portrayals of UN women's conferences, 1975-1995, have not found this to be the case. To the contrary, U.S. press coverage of these conferences follows a seemingly universal pattern of negative representations of female political candidates and public officials in the media. However, since there are sharp national differences in social policies related to women, we question whether media in other liberal democracies follow the U.S. pattern for covering UN women's conferences or reflect the more variable pattern of diverse national policies. Comparing elite media from the United States, Canada, and Britain, we find evidence suggesting variable coverage across countries.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)113-139
Number of pages27
JournalComparative Sociology
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

print media
coverage
UNO
event
elite
candidacy
Canada
democracy
politics
evidence

Keywords

  • International Women's Year
  • liberal democracy
  • media
  • UN conference
  • women's movement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Liberal states and print media coverage of global advocacy events : The case of the un Beijing conference for women. / Mueller, Carol; Restifo, Salvatore J.; Restifo, Julie Fox.

In: Comparative Sociology, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2012, p. 113-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mueller, Carol ; Restifo, Salvatore J. ; Restifo, Julie Fox. / Liberal states and print media coverage of global advocacy events : The case of the un Beijing conference for women. In: Comparative Sociology. 2012 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 113-139.
@article{14b020f6136044579f3e5d84f8a67d2e,
title = "Liberal states and print media coverage of global advocacy events: The case of the un Beijing conference for women",
abstract = "UN conferences and summits have played a critical role in bringing local activists' claims to international audiences. One might assume that UN conferences, like other fora of {"}information politics,{"} rely on the global media to convey advocates' messages. Yet, extensive research on U.S. media portrayals of UN women's conferences, 1975-1995, have not found this to be the case. To the contrary, U.S. press coverage of these conferences follows a seemingly universal pattern of negative representations of female political candidates and public officials in the media. However, since there are sharp national differences in social policies related to women, we question whether media in other liberal democracies follow the U.S. pattern for covering UN women's conferences or reflect the more variable pattern of diverse national policies. Comparing elite media from the United States, Canada, and Britain, we find evidence suggesting variable coverage across countries.",
keywords = "International Women's Year, liberal democracy, media, UN conference, women's movement",
author = "Carol Mueller and Restifo, {Salvatore J.} and Restifo, {Julie Fox}",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1163/156913312X621659",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "113--139",
journal = "Comparative Sociology",
issn = "1569-1322",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liberal states and print media coverage of global advocacy events

T2 - The case of the un Beijing conference for women

AU - Mueller, Carol

AU - Restifo, Salvatore J.

AU - Restifo, Julie Fox

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - UN conferences and summits have played a critical role in bringing local activists' claims to international audiences. One might assume that UN conferences, like other fora of "information politics," rely on the global media to convey advocates' messages. Yet, extensive research on U.S. media portrayals of UN women's conferences, 1975-1995, have not found this to be the case. To the contrary, U.S. press coverage of these conferences follows a seemingly universal pattern of negative representations of female political candidates and public officials in the media. However, since there are sharp national differences in social policies related to women, we question whether media in other liberal democracies follow the U.S. pattern for covering UN women's conferences or reflect the more variable pattern of diverse national policies. Comparing elite media from the United States, Canada, and Britain, we find evidence suggesting variable coverage across countries.

AB - UN conferences and summits have played a critical role in bringing local activists' claims to international audiences. One might assume that UN conferences, like other fora of "information politics," rely on the global media to convey advocates' messages. Yet, extensive research on U.S. media portrayals of UN women's conferences, 1975-1995, have not found this to be the case. To the contrary, U.S. press coverage of these conferences follows a seemingly universal pattern of negative representations of female political candidates and public officials in the media. However, since there are sharp national differences in social policies related to women, we question whether media in other liberal democracies follow the U.S. pattern for covering UN women's conferences or reflect the more variable pattern of diverse national policies. Comparing elite media from the United States, Canada, and Britain, we find evidence suggesting variable coverage across countries.

KW - International Women's Year

KW - liberal democracy

KW - media

KW - UN conference

KW - women's movement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84858662384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84858662384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/156913312X621659

DO - 10.1163/156913312X621659

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84858662384

VL - 11

SP - 113

EP - 139

JO - Comparative Sociology

JF - Comparative Sociology

SN - 1569-1322

IS - 1

ER -