LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings

Elizabeth A. Minton, Frank Cabano, Meryl Gardner, Daniele Mathras, Esi Elliot, Naomi Mandel

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The USA is witnessing a conflict between LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) consumers/supporters and Christian fundamentalist service providers/opponents regarding whether service can be denied based on religious values. The purpose of this paper is to make a timely investigation into this conflict between marketplace inclusion (for LGBTQ consumers) and freedom of religion (for religious service providers). Design/methodology/approach: The intersection of marketplace inclusion for LGBTQ consumers and religious freedom for service providers is examined by identifying appropriate strategies that address this conflict and reviewing how differing religious perspectives influence perceptions of LGBTQ consumer rights, all building off the social identity threat literature. Findings: LGBTQ and religious identities often conflict to influence consumer behavior and service provider interactions. Such conflict is heightened when there is a lack of substitutes (i.e. only one service provider in an area for a specific service). Common LGBTQ consumer responses include changing service providers, providing justification for the provision of services and pursing legal recourse. Suggested strategies to address this conflict include highlighting common social identities and using two-sided messages for service providers, using in-group interventions for social groups and using government interventions for public policy. Originality/value: Research has yet to examine the conflict between marketplace inclusion and religious freedom, particularly for the inclusion of LGBTQ consumers. Thus, this paper provides a novel conceptual model detailing these relationships to stimulate discussion among consumers, service providers, social groups and public policy in addition to serving as a foundation for future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)351-361
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Services Marketing
Volume31
Issue number4-5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Service provider
Lesbian
Inclusion
Social identity
Public policy
Consumer services
Social groups
Consumer behaviour
Fundamentalists
Consumer rights
Threat
Design methodology
Reviewing
Government intervention
Substitute
Consumer response
Justification
Conceptual model
Interaction

Keywords

  • Freedom of religion
  • LGBTQ consumers
  • Marketplace inclusion
  • Reactance
  • Religious service providers
  • Social identity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing

Cite this

Minton, E. A., Cabano, F., Gardner, M., Mathras, D., Elliot, E., & Mandel, N. (2017). LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings. Journal of Services Marketing, 31(4-5), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0196

LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings. / Minton, Elizabeth A.; Cabano, Frank; Gardner, Meryl; Mathras, Daniele; Elliot, Esi; Mandel, Naomi.

In: Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 31, No. 4-5, 2017, p. 351-361.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Minton, EA, Cabano, F, Gardner, M, Mathras, D, Elliot, E & Mandel, N 2017, 'LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings', Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 31, no. 4-5, pp. 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0196
Minton, Elizabeth A. ; Cabano, Frank ; Gardner, Meryl ; Mathras, Daniele ; Elliot, Esi ; Mandel, Naomi. / LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings. In: Journal of Services Marketing. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 4-5. pp. 351-361.
@article{cd735729d69642a79e9115a616c93c04,
title = "LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings",
abstract = "Purpose: The USA is witnessing a conflict between LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) consumers/supporters and Christian fundamentalist service providers/opponents regarding whether service can be denied based on religious values. The purpose of this paper is to make a timely investigation into this conflict between marketplace inclusion (for LGBTQ consumers) and freedom of religion (for religious service providers). Design/methodology/approach: The intersection of marketplace inclusion for LGBTQ consumers and religious freedom for service providers is examined by identifying appropriate strategies that address this conflict and reviewing how differing religious perspectives influence perceptions of LGBTQ consumer rights, all building off the social identity threat literature. Findings: LGBTQ and religious identities often conflict to influence consumer behavior and service provider interactions. Such conflict is heightened when there is a lack of substitutes (i.e. only one service provider in an area for a specific service). Common LGBTQ consumer responses include changing service providers, providing justification for the provision of services and pursing legal recourse. Suggested strategies to address this conflict include highlighting common social identities and using two-sided messages for service providers, using in-group interventions for social groups and using government interventions for public policy. Originality/value: Research has yet to examine the conflict between marketplace inclusion and religious freedom, particularly for the inclusion of LGBTQ consumers. Thus, this paper provides a novel conceptual model detailing these relationships to stimulate discussion among consumers, service providers, social groups and public policy in addition to serving as a foundation for future research.",
keywords = "Freedom of religion, LGBTQ consumers, Marketplace inclusion, Reactance, Religious service providers, Social identity",
author = "Minton, {Elizabeth A.} and Frank Cabano and Meryl Gardner and Daniele Mathras and Esi Elliot and Naomi Mandel",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0196",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "351--361",
journal = "Journal of Services Marketing",
issn = "0887-6045",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4-5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - LGBTQ and religious identity conflict in service settings

AU - Minton, Elizabeth A.

AU - Cabano, Frank

AU - Gardner, Meryl

AU - Mathras, Daniele

AU - Elliot, Esi

AU - Mandel, Naomi

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: The USA is witnessing a conflict between LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) consumers/supporters and Christian fundamentalist service providers/opponents regarding whether service can be denied based on religious values. The purpose of this paper is to make a timely investigation into this conflict between marketplace inclusion (for LGBTQ consumers) and freedom of religion (for religious service providers). Design/methodology/approach: The intersection of marketplace inclusion for LGBTQ consumers and religious freedom for service providers is examined by identifying appropriate strategies that address this conflict and reviewing how differing religious perspectives influence perceptions of LGBTQ consumer rights, all building off the social identity threat literature. Findings: LGBTQ and religious identities often conflict to influence consumer behavior and service provider interactions. Such conflict is heightened when there is a lack of substitutes (i.e. only one service provider in an area for a specific service). Common LGBTQ consumer responses include changing service providers, providing justification for the provision of services and pursing legal recourse. Suggested strategies to address this conflict include highlighting common social identities and using two-sided messages for service providers, using in-group interventions for social groups and using government interventions for public policy. Originality/value: Research has yet to examine the conflict between marketplace inclusion and religious freedom, particularly for the inclusion of LGBTQ consumers. Thus, this paper provides a novel conceptual model detailing these relationships to stimulate discussion among consumers, service providers, social groups and public policy in addition to serving as a foundation for future research.

AB - Purpose: The USA is witnessing a conflict between LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) consumers/supporters and Christian fundamentalist service providers/opponents regarding whether service can be denied based on religious values. The purpose of this paper is to make a timely investigation into this conflict between marketplace inclusion (for LGBTQ consumers) and freedom of religion (for religious service providers). Design/methodology/approach: The intersection of marketplace inclusion for LGBTQ consumers and religious freedom for service providers is examined by identifying appropriate strategies that address this conflict and reviewing how differing religious perspectives influence perceptions of LGBTQ consumer rights, all building off the social identity threat literature. Findings: LGBTQ and religious identities often conflict to influence consumer behavior and service provider interactions. Such conflict is heightened when there is a lack of substitutes (i.e. only one service provider in an area for a specific service). Common LGBTQ consumer responses include changing service providers, providing justification for the provision of services and pursing legal recourse. Suggested strategies to address this conflict include highlighting common social identities and using two-sided messages for service providers, using in-group interventions for social groups and using government interventions for public policy. Originality/value: Research has yet to examine the conflict between marketplace inclusion and religious freedom, particularly for the inclusion of LGBTQ consumers. Thus, this paper provides a novel conceptual model detailing these relationships to stimulate discussion among consumers, service providers, social groups and public policy in addition to serving as a foundation for future research.

KW - Freedom of religion

KW - LGBTQ consumers

KW - Marketplace inclusion

KW - Reactance

KW - Religious service providers

KW - Social identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027840060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027840060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0196

DO - 10.1108/JSM-05-2016-0196

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85027840060

VL - 31

SP - 351

EP - 361

JO - Journal of Services Marketing

JF - Journal of Services Marketing

SN - 0887-6045

IS - 4-5

ER -