TY - JOUR
T1 - Leveraging Vertically Integrated Courses and Problem-Based Learning to Improve Students' Performance and Skills
AU - Elzomor, Mohamed
AU - Mann, Chelsea
AU - Doten-Snitker, Kerice
AU - Parrish, Kristen
AU - Chester, Mikhail
N1 - Funding Information:
This research is funded by Grant DUE-1245205 from the National Science Foundation (NSF). This support is gratefully acknowledged. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 American Society of Civil Engineers.
PY - 2018/10/1
Y1 - 2018/10/1
N2 - Commonly adopted engineering pedagogy tends to be lecture based, and places students in a passive and often secondary role in the classroom. Research in the field of engineering education highlights the ineffectiveness of such strategies and advocates adopting strategies that actively engage learners. Various pedagogical techniques promote student engagement; this paper focuses on two specific techniques: problem-based learning (PBL) and vertical integration. The authors created engaging classroom environments through vertically integrated courses that implemented PBL through shared course projects. Specifically, the authors created a framework for pairing two different student bodies across two disciplines, integrating a graduate civil engineering course (32 students) and an undergraduate construction management course (22 students). Implementation of the Spring 2016 framework improves student performance on course projects and students' self-reported professional skill level and confidence in said skills, developed in part through participation in the framework. Further, the framework has a positive impact on undergraduate students' intention to stay in their major and both student bodies report more interest in completing an additional advanced degree after participating in the vertically integrated courses. Finally, students report that the experience teaches professional skills they expect will be required in their own future careers. It is notable that undergraduates recognized more benefits of this implementation, especially that they have more potential for improvement than advanced graduate students. This paper contributes to the engineering education body of knowledge by delivering a proof of concept that PBL through vertical integration of different disciplines across undergraduate and graduate students supports improved performance and encourages professional skill development and confidence. The paper presents the framework itself, as well as evaluative results from framework implementation.
AB - Commonly adopted engineering pedagogy tends to be lecture based, and places students in a passive and often secondary role in the classroom. Research in the field of engineering education highlights the ineffectiveness of such strategies and advocates adopting strategies that actively engage learners. Various pedagogical techniques promote student engagement; this paper focuses on two specific techniques: problem-based learning (PBL) and vertical integration. The authors created engaging classroom environments through vertically integrated courses that implemented PBL through shared course projects. Specifically, the authors created a framework for pairing two different student bodies across two disciplines, integrating a graduate civil engineering course (32 students) and an undergraduate construction management course (22 students). Implementation of the Spring 2016 framework improves student performance on course projects and students' self-reported professional skill level and confidence in said skills, developed in part through participation in the framework. Further, the framework has a positive impact on undergraduate students' intention to stay in their major and both student bodies report more interest in completing an additional advanced degree after participating in the vertically integrated courses. Finally, students report that the experience teaches professional skills they expect will be required in their own future careers. It is notable that undergraduates recognized more benefits of this implementation, especially that they have more potential for improvement than advanced graduate students. This paper contributes to the engineering education body of knowledge by delivering a proof of concept that PBL through vertical integration of different disciplines across undergraduate and graduate students supports improved performance and encourages professional skill development and confidence. The paper presents the framework itself, as well as evaluative results from framework implementation.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049571544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049571544&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000379
DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000379
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85049571544
SN - 1052-3928
VL - 144
JO - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
JF - Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice
IS - 4
M1 - 04018009
ER -