Legitimacy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Compared to 'illegitimacy', 'legitimacy' has a more precise meaning in political theory and sociology, focusing on the justification and acceptance of political authority - the authority of the International Whaling Commission to ban commercial whaling, for example, or of the World Trade Organisation to review measures adopted pursuant to environmental agreements. A legitimate institution is one that has a right to govern - for example, based on tradition, expertise, legality, or public accountability - rather than one relying on the mere exercise of power. In recent years, legitimacy has begun to emerge as an issue not only in international law generally but also in international environmental law more specifically. This article deals with the issue of legitimacy. It first looks at the concept of legitimacy and then presents a typology of legitimacy theories, why legitimacy is a growing issue in international environmental law, and alternative bases of legitimacy, focusing on democracy, participation and transparency, and expertise and effectiveness. The article concludes by considering how to develop trust in international environmental institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Print)9780191743740, 9780199552153
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 18 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

legitimacy
international law
environmental law
expertise
illegitimacy
political sociology
legality
political theory
ban
WTO
transparency
typology
acceptance
democracy
responsibility
participation

Keywords

  • Democracy
  • Effectiveness
  • Expertise
  • International environmental law
  • International law
  • Legitimacy
  • Legitimacy theories
  • Participation
  • Transparency
  • Trust

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Bodansky, D. (2012). Legitimacy. In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0030

Legitimacy. / Bodansky, Daniel.

The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Bodansky, D 2012, Legitimacy. in The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0030
Bodansky D. Legitimacy. In The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0030
Bodansky, Daniel. / Legitimacy. The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{32705081d5224d94b7a1af958b0d948d,
title = "Legitimacy",
abstract = "Compared to 'illegitimacy', 'legitimacy' has a more precise meaning in political theory and sociology, focusing on the justification and acceptance of political authority - the authority of the International Whaling Commission to ban commercial whaling, for example, or of the World Trade Organisation to review measures adopted pursuant to environmental agreements. A legitimate institution is one that has a right to govern - for example, based on tradition, expertise, legality, or public accountability - rather than one relying on the mere exercise of power. In recent years, legitimacy has begun to emerge as an issue not only in international law generally but also in international environmental law more specifically. This article deals with the issue of legitimacy. It first looks at the concept of legitimacy and then presents a typology of legitimacy theories, why legitimacy is a growing issue in international environmental law, and alternative bases of legitimacy, focusing on democracy, participation and transparency, and expertise and effectiveness. The article concludes by considering how to develop trust in international environmental institutions.",
keywords = "Democracy, Effectiveness, Expertise, International environmental law, International law, Legitimacy, Legitimacy theories, Participation, Transparency, Trust",
author = "Daniel Bodansky",
year = "2012",
month = "9",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0030",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780191743740",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Legitimacy

AU - Bodansky, Daniel

PY - 2012/9/18

Y1 - 2012/9/18

N2 - Compared to 'illegitimacy', 'legitimacy' has a more precise meaning in political theory and sociology, focusing on the justification and acceptance of political authority - the authority of the International Whaling Commission to ban commercial whaling, for example, or of the World Trade Organisation to review measures adopted pursuant to environmental agreements. A legitimate institution is one that has a right to govern - for example, based on tradition, expertise, legality, or public accountability - rather than one relying on the mere exercise of power. In recent years, legitimacy has begun to emerge as an issue not only in international law generally but also in international environmental law more specifically. This article deals with the issue of legitimacy. It first looks at the concept of legitimacy and then presents a typology of legitimacy theories, why legitimacy is a growing issue in international environmental law, and alternative bases of legitimacy, focusing on democracy, participation and transparency, and expertise and effectiveness. The article concludes by considering how to develop trust in international environmental institutions.

AB - Compared to 'illegitimacy', 'legitimacy' has a more precise meaning in political theory and sociology, focusing on the justification and acceptance of political authority - the authority of the International Whaling Commission to ban commercial whaling, for example, or of the World Trade Organisation to review measures adopted pursuant to environmental agreements. A legitimate institution is one that has a right to govern - for example, based on tradition, expertise, legality, or public accountability - rather than one relying on the mere exercise of power. In recent years, legitimacy has begun to emerge as an issue not only in international law generally but also in international environmental law more specifically. This article deals with the issue of legitimacy. It first looks at the concept of legitimacy and then presents a typology of legitimacy theories, why legitimacy is a growing issue in international environmental law, and alternative bases of legitimacy, focusing on democracy, participation and transparency, and expertise and effectiveness. The article concludes by considering how to develop trust in international environmental institutions.

KW - Democracy

KW - Effectiveness

KW - Expertise

KW - International environmental law

KW - International law

KW - Legitimacy

KW - Legitimacy theories

KW - Participation

KW - Transparency

KW - Trust

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924326145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924326145&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0030

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199552153.013.0030

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924326145

SN - 9780191743740

SN - 9780199552153

BT - The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -