Legislating the laboratory? Promotion and precaution in a nanomaterials company.

Robin Phelps, Erik Fisher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Legislation is a form of governance that directs attention and prescribes action. Within the domain of nanoscience, the US 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act contains mandates not only for rapid development for economic competitiveness but also for responsible implementation, which is required to take place by integrating societal considerations into research and development. This chapter investigates whether these two mandates tend more to coexist or compete with one another, both in the purview of nanoscience policy and in the venue of nanoscience practice. This chapter first reviews macrolevel analysis of the directives contained in the legislation. It then examines, drawing on an empirical case study, how these directives manifest at the microlevel of a nanoscience research and development laboratory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)339-358
Number of pages20
JournalMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)
Volume726
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Nanostructures
Legislation
Research
Nanotechnology
Economic Development

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Legislating the laboratory? Promotion and precaution in a nanomaterials company. / Phelps, Robin; Fisher, Erik.

In: Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), Vol. 726, 2011, p. 339-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0369592b15194daaa6fdd2c0c0e019d2,
title = "Legislating the laboratory? Promotion and precaution in a nanomaterials company.",
abstract = "Legislation is a form of governance that directs attention and prescribes action. Within the domain of nanoscience, the US 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act contains mandates not only for rapid development for economic competitiveness but also for responsible implementation, which is required to take place by integrating societal considerations into research and development. This chapter investigates whether these two mandates tend more to coexist or compete with one another, both in the purview of nanoscience policy and in the venue of nanoscience practice. This chapter first reviews macrolevel analysis of the directives contained in the legislation. It then examines, drawing on an empirical case study, how these directives manifest at the microlevel of a nanoscience research and development laboratory.",
author = "Robin Phelps and Erik Fisher",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-61779-052-2_22",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "726",
pages = "339--358",
journal = "Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)",
issn = "1064-3745",
publisher = "Humana Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legislating the laboratory? Promotion and precaution in a nanomaterials company.

AU - Phelps, Robin

AU - Fisher, Erik

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Legislation is a form of governance that directs attention and prescribes action. Within the domain of nanoscience, the US 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act contains mandates not only for rapid development for economic competitiveness but also for responsible implementation, which is required to take place by integrating societal considerations into research and development. This chapter investigates whether these two mandates tend more to coexist or compete with one another, both in the purview of nanoscience policy and in the venue of nanoscience practice. This chapter first reviews macrolevel analysis of the directives contained in the legislation. It then examines, drawing on an empirical case study, how these directives manifest at the microlevel of a nanoscience research and development laboratory.

AB - Legislation is a form of governance that directs attention and prescribes action. Within the domain of nanoscience, the US 21st Century Nanotechnology Research and Development Act contains mandates not only for rapid development for economic competitiveness but also for responsible implementation, which is required to take place by integrating societal considerations into research and development. This chapter investigates whether these two mandates tend more to coexist or compete with one another, both in the purview of nanoscience policy and in the venue of nanoscience practice. This chapter first reviews macrolevel analysis of the directives contained in the legislation. It then examines, drawing on an empirical case study, how these directives manifest at the microlevel of a nanoscience research and development laboratory.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79959810880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79959810880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-61779-052-2_22

DO - 10.1007/978-1-61779-052-2_22

M3 - Article

C2 - 21424460

AN - SCOPUS:79959810880

VL - 726

SP - 339

EP - 358

JO - Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)

JF - Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)

SN - 1064-3745

ER -