Legal Socialization and Self-Reported Criminal Offending: The Role of Procedural Justice and Legal Orientations

Kimberly Kaiser, Michael Reisig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The procedural justice model of legal socialization holds that personal fairness judgments influence criminal offending directly and indirectly, via legal orientations (e.g. legitimacy and legal cynicism). This study used longitudinal data to empirically scrutinize these arguments.Methods: Using 11 waves of data from the Pathways to Desistance study (i.e. baseline and 10 follow-up interviews), a series of time-lagged, multi-level longitudinal regression models with time-varying and time-stable measures decomposed into between- and within-individual components were estimated. Results: The estimates from the linear mixed-effects models showed that procedural justice judgments directly influence legitimacy and, though relatively more limited, legal cynicism over time both between- and within-individuals. Test statistics indicated too that positive procedural justice judgments reduce involvement in criminal offending between individuals. However, legitimacy is found to significantly mediate the effect of personal procedural justice judgments. The effect of vicarious procedural justice judgments remained statistically significant in explaining differences in criminal offending. As for the within-individual model, neither procedural justice scale predicted offending. However, legal cynicism did have a direct significant effect in the within-individual offending model. Conclusions: The findings support key elements legal socialization theory, especially the premise that the way in which criminal justice authorities treat the individuals they come into contact with influences (albeit indirectly) subsequent compliance with the law.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-20
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 9 2017

Fingerprint

Socialization
Social Justice
socialization
justice
Illegitimacy
legitimacy
socialization theory
Criminal Law
legal theory
Longitudinal Studies
fairness
Interviews
statistics
contact
regression
Law
time
interview

Keywords

  • Desistance
  • Life course
  • Longitudinal analysis
  • Process-based model
  • Recidivism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

@article{a8b44c3cb6824380a47dcab5825fdd6d,
title = "Legal Socialization and Self-Reported Criminal Offending: The Role of Procedural Justice and Legal Orientations",
abstract = "Objectives: The procedural justice model of legal socialization holds that personal fairness judgments influence criminal offending directly and indirectly, via legal orientations (e.g. legitimacy and legal cynicism). This study used longitudinal data to empirically scrutinize these arguments.Methods: Using 11 waves of data from the Pathways to Desistance study (i.e. baseline and 10 follow-up interviews), a series of time-lagged, multi-level longitudinal regression models with time-varying and time-stable measures decomposed into between- and within-individual components were estimated. Results: The estimates from the linear mixed-effects models showed that procedural justice judgments directly influence legitimacy and, though relatively more limited, legal cynicism over time both between- and within-individuals. Test statistics indicated too that positive procedural justice judgments reduce involvement in criminal offending between individuals. However, legitimacy is found to significantly mediate the effect of personal procedural justice judgments. The effect of vicarious procedural justice judgments remained statistically significant in explaining differences in criminal offending. As for the within-individual model, neither procedural justice scale predicted offending. However, legal cynicism did have a direct significant effect in the within-individual offending model. Conclusions: The findings support key elements legal socialization theory, especially the premise that the way in which criminal justice authorities treat the individuals they come into contact with influences (albeit indirectly) subsequent compliance with the law.",
keywords = "Desistance, Life course, Longitudinal analysis, Process-based model, Recidivism",
author = "Kimberly Kaiser and Michael Reisig",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--20",
journal = "Journal of Quantitative Criminology",
issn = "0748-4518",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal Socialization and Self-Reported Criminal Offending

T2 - The Role of Procedural Justice and Legal Orientations

AU - Kaiser, Kimberly

AU - Reisig, Michael

PY - 2017/12/9

Y1 - 2017/12/9

N2 - Objectives: The procedural justice model of legal socialization holds that personal fairness judgments influence criminal offending directly and indirectly, via legal orientations (e.g. legitimacy and legal cynicism). This study used longitudinal data to empirically scrutinize these arguments.Methods: Using 11 waves of data from the Pathways to Desistance study (i.e. baseline and 10 follow-up interviews), a series of time-lagged, multi-level longitudinal regression models with time-varying and time-stable measures decomposed into between- and within-individual components were estimated. Results: The estimates from the linear mixed-effects models showed that procedural justice judgments directly influence legitimacy and, though relatively more limited, legal cynicism over time both between- and within-individuals. Test statistics indicated too that positive procedural justice judgments reduce involvement in criminal offending between individuals. However, legitimacy is found to significantly mediate the effect of personal procedural justice judgments. The effect of vicarious procedural justice judgments remained statistically significant in explaining differences in criminal offending. As for the within-individual model, neither procedural justice scale predicted offending. However, legal cynicism did have a direct significant effect in the within-individual offending model. Conclusions: The findings support key elements legal socialization theory, especially the premise that the way in which criminal justice authorities treat the individuals they come into contact with influences (albeit indirectly) subsequent compliance with the law.

AB - Objectives: The procedural justice model of legal socialization holds that personal fairness judgments influence criminal offending directly and indirectly, via legal orientations (e.g. legitimacy and legal cynicism). This study used longitudinal data to empirically scrutinize these arguments.Methods: Using 11 waves of data from the Pathways to Desistance study (i.e. baseline and 10 follow-up interviews), a series of time-lagged, multi-level longitudinal regression models with time-varying and time-stable measures decomposed into between- and within-individual components were estimated. Results: The estimates from the linear mixed-effects models showed that procedural justice judgments directly influence legitimacy and, though relatively more limited, legal cynicism over time both between- and within-individuals. Test statistics indicated too that positive procedural justice judgments reduce involvement in criminal offending between individuals. However, legitimacy is found to significantly mediate the effect of personal procedural justice judgments. The effect of vicarious procedural justice judgments remained statistically significant in explaining differences in criminal offending. As for the within-individual model, neither procedural justice scale predicted offending. However, legal cynicism did have a direct significant effect in the within-individual offending model. Conclusions: The findings support key elements legal socialization theory, especially the premise that the way in which criminal justice authorities treat the individuals they come into contact with influences (albeit indirectly) subsequent compliance with the law.

KW - Desistance

KW - Life course

KW - Longitudinal analysis

KW - Process-based model

KW - Recidivism

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037637817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037637817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4

DO - 10.1007/s10940-017-9375-4

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037637817

SP - 1

EP - 20

JO - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

JF - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

SN - 0748-4518

ER -