Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders

Elizabeth Cauffman, Alex R. Piquero, Eva Kimonis, Laurence Steinberg, Laurie Chassin, Jeffery Fagan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Historically, the juvenile court has been expected to consider each youth's distinct rehabilitative needs in the dispositional decision-making process, rather than focusing on legal factors alone. This study examines the extent to which demographic, psychological, contextual, and legal factors, independently predict dispositional outcomes (i.e., probation vs. confinement) within two juvenile court jurisdictions (Philadelphia, Phoenix). The sample consists of 1,355 14- to 18-year-old male and female juvenile offenders adjudicated of a serious criminal offense. Results suggest that legal factors have the strongest influence on disposition in both jurisdictions. For example, a higher number of prior court referrals is associated with an increased likelihood of secure confinement in both jurisdictions. Juveniles adjudicated of violent offenses are more likely to receive secure confinement in Phoenix, but are more likely to be placed on probation in Philadelphia. Race is unrelated to dispositional outcome, but, males are consistently more likely than females to be placed in secure confinement. Importantly, individual factors (e.g., developmental maturity) generally were not powerful independent predictors of disposition. Finally, an examination of the predictors of juvenile versus adult court transfer in Phoenix indicated that males, older juveniles, and those with a violent adjudicated charge were more likely to be transferred to adult court, while juveniles scoring high on responsibility as well as those juveniles with an alcohol dependence diagnosis were more likely to be retained in juvenile court.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)519-535
Number of pages17
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume31
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

juvenile court
legal factors
disposition
offender
adolescent
jurisdiction
probation
offense
juvenile offender
Alcoholism
psychological factors
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
maturity
Demography
Psychology
decision-making process
alcohol
responsibility
examination

Keywords

  • Adolescence
  • Juvenile justice
  • Maturity
  • Sentencing
  • Waiver to adult court

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. / Cauffman, Elizabeth; Piquero, Alex R.; Kimonis, Eva; Steinberg, Laurence; Chassin, Laurie; Fagan, Jeffery.

In: Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 6, 12.2007, p. 519-535.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cauffman, Elizabeth ; Piquero, Alex R. ; Kimonis, Eva ; Steinberg, Laurence ; Chassin, Laurie ; Fagan, Jeffery. / Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. In: Law and Human Behavior. 2007 ; Vol. 31, No. 6. pp. 519-535.
@article{d713e29b32d849e4adb256c95acb30a4,
title = "Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders",
abstract = "Historically, the juvenile court has been expected to consider each youth's distinct rehabilitative needs in the dispositional decision-making process, rather than focusing on legal factors alone. This study examines the extent to which demographic, psychological, contextual, and legal factors, independently predict dispositional outcomes (i.e., probation vs. confinement) within two juvenile court jurisdictions (Philadelphia, Phoenix). The sample consists of 1,355 14- to 18-year-old male and female juvenile offenders adjudicated of a serious criminal offense. Results suggest that legal factors have the strongest influence on disposition in both jurisdictions. For example, a higher number of prior court referrals is associated with an increased likelihood of secure confinement in both jurisdictions. Juveniles adjudicated of violent offenses are more likely to receive secure confinement in Phoenix, but are more likely to be placed on probation in Philadelphia. Race is unrelated to dispositional outcome, but, males are consistently more likely than females to be placed in secure confinement. Importantly, individual factors (e.g., developmental maturity) generally were not powerful independent predictors of disposition. Finally, an examination of the predictors of juvenile versus adult court transfer in Phoenix indicated that males, older juveniles, and those with a violent adjudicated charge were more likely to be transferred to adult court, while juveniles scoring high on responsibility as well as those juveniles with an alcohol dependence diagnosis were more likely to be retained in juvenile court.",
keywords = "Adolescence, Juvenile justice, Maturity, Sentencing, Waiver to adult court",
author = "Elizabeth Cauffman and Piquero, {Alex R.} and Eva Kimonis and Laurence Steinberg and Laurie Chassin and Jeffery Fagan",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10979-006-9076-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "519--535",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders

AU - Cauffman, Elizabeth

AU - Piquero, Alex R.

AU - Kimonis, Eva

AU - Steinberg, Laurence

AU - Chassin, Laurie

AU - Fagan, Jeffery

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - Historically, the juvenile court has been expected to consider each youth's distinct rehabilitative needs in the dispositional decision-making process, rather than focusing on legal factors alone. This study examines the extent to which demographic, psychological, contextual, and legal factors, independently predict dispositional outcomes (i.e., probation vs. confinement) within two juvenile court jurisdictions (Philadelphia, Phoenix). The sample consists of 1,355 14- to 18-year-old male and female juvenile offenders adjudicated of a serious criminal offense. Results suggest that legal factors have the strongest influence on disposition in both jurisdictions. For example, a higher number of prior court referrals is associated with an increased likelihood of secure confinement in both jurisdictions. Juveniles adjudicated of violent offenses are more likely to receive secure confinement in Phoenix, but are more likely to be placed on probation in Philadelphia. Race is unrelated to dispositional outcome, but, males are consistently more likely than females to be placed in secure confinement. Importantly, individual factors (e.g., developmental maturity) generally were not powerful independent predictors of disposition. Finally, an examination of the predictors of juvenile versus adult court transfer in Phoenix indicated that males, older juveniles, and those with a violent adjudicated charge were more likely to be transferred to adult court, while juveniles scoring high on responsibility as well as those juveniles with an alcohol dependence diagnosis were more likely to be retained in juvenile court.

AB - Historically, the juvenile court has been expected to consider each youth's distinct rehabilitative needs in the dispositional decision-making process, rather than focusing on legal factors alone. This study examines the extent to which demographic, psychological, contextual, and legal factors, independently predict dispositional outcomes (i.e., probation vs. confinement) within two juvenile court jurisdictions (Philadelphia, Phoenix). The sample consists of 1,355 14- to 18-year-old male and female juvenile offenders adjudicated of a serious criminal offense. Results suggest that legal factors have the strongest influence on disposition in both jurisdictions. For example, a higher number of prior court referrals is associated with an increased likelihood of secure confinement in both jurisdictions. Juveniles adjudicated of violent offenses are more likely to receive secure confinement in Phoenix, but are more likely to be placed on probation in Philadelphia. Race is unrelated to dispositional outcome, but, males are consistently more likely than females to be placed in secure confinement. Importantly, individual factors (e.g., developmental maturity) generally were not powerful independent predictors of disposition. Finally, an examination of the predictors of juvenile versus adult court transfer in Phoenix indicated that males, older juveniles, and those with a violent adjudicated charge were more likely to be transferred to adult court, while juveniles scoring high on responsibility as well as those juveniles with an alcohol dependence diagnosis were more likely to be retained in juvenile court.

KW - Adolescence

KW - Juvenile justice

KW - Maturity

KW - Sentencing

KW - Waiver to adult court

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=36348986091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=36348986091&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10979-006-9076-2

DO - 10.1007/s10979-006-9076-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 17245634

AN - SCOPUS:36348986091

VL - 31

SP - 519

EP - 535

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 6

ER -