Abstract

Neither US regulatory programs nor the US legal system have yet to be confronted with a regulatory decision in which hormesis played a significant role. Nonetheless, with the growing scientific attention being paid to the large body of data suggesting that many otherwise toxic agents may exhibit a protective effect at low concentrations, it is highly likely that the regulatory and legal systems will soon face the challenge of whether and how hormesis should be incorporated into regulatory decisions. This article describes the legal criteria and judicial precedents that are likely to govern the incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making. While these various legal requirements will be influential in agency decision-making with respect to hormesis, it is likely that, due to the fundamental shift in assumptions that hormesis represents, legal decision-makers will largely defer to scientific opinion, as expressed through the recommendations of agency scientific advisory boards and other scientific entities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)141-153
Number of pages13
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume288
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 8 2002

Fingerprint

legal system
Decision making
decision making
Poisons
incorporation
decision
opinion
effect
recommendation
programme

Keywords

  • Hormesis
  • Judicial decisions
  • Legal requirements
  • Regulatory decision-making

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Legal criteria and judicial precedents relevant to incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making. / Marchant, Gary.

In: Science of the Total Environment, Vol. 288, No. 1-2, 08.04.2002, p. 141-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{48625d680daa4896a1352573e442508c,
title = "Legal criteria and judicial precedents relevant to incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making",
abstract = "Neither US regulatory programs nor the US legal system have yet to be confronted with a regulatory decision in which hormesis played a significant role. Nonetheless, with the growing scientific attention being paid to the large body of data suggesting that many otherwise toxic agents may exhibit a protective effect at low concentrations, it is highly likely that the regulatory and legal systems will soon face the challenge of whether and how hormesis should be incorporated into regulatory decisions. This article describes the legal criteria and judicial precedents that are likely to govern the incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making. While these various legal requirements will be influential in agency decision-making with respect to hormesis, it is likely that, due to the fundamental shift in assumptions that hormesis represents, legal decision-makers will largely defer to scientific opinion, as expressed through the recommendations of agency scientific advisory boards and other scientific entities.",
keywords = "Hormesis, Judicial decisions, Legal requirements, Regulatory decision-making",
author = "Gary Marchant",
year = "2002",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01110-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "288",
pages = "141--153",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legal criteria and judicial precedents relevant to incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making

AU - Marchant, Gary

PY - 2002/4/8

Y1 - 2002/4/8

N2 - Neither US regulatory programs nor the US legal system have yet to be confronted with a regulatory decision in which hormesis played a significant role. Nonetheless, with the growing scientific attention being paid to the large body of data suggesting that many otherwise toxic agents may exhibit a protective effect at low concentrations, it is highly likely that the regulatory and legal systems will soon face the challenge of whether and how hormesis should be incorporated into regulatory decisions. This article describes the legal criteria and judicial precedents that are likely to govern the incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making. While these various legal requirements will be influential in agency decision-making with respect to hormesis, it is likely that, due to the fundamental shift in assumptions that hormesis represents, legal decision-makers will largely defer to scientific opinion, as expressed through the recommendations of agency scientific advisory boards and other scientific entities.

AB - Neither US regulatory programs nor the US legal system have yet to be confronted with a regulatory decision in which hormesis played a significant role. Nonetheless, with the growing scientific attention being paid to the large body of data suggesting that many otherwise toxic agents may exhibit a protective effect at low concentrations, it is highly likely that the regulatory and legal systems will soon face the challenge of whether and how hormesis should be incorporated into regulatory decisions. This article describes the legal criteria and judicial precedents that are likely to govern the incorporation of hormesis into regulatory decision-making. While these various legal requirements will be influential in agency decision-making with respect to hormesis, it is likely that, due to the fundamental shift in assumptions that hormesis represents, legal decision-makers will largely defer to scientific opinion, as expressed through the recommendations of agency scientific advisory boards and other scientific entities.

KW - Hormesis

KW - Judicial decisions

KW - Legal requirements

KW - Regulatory decision-making

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037041253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037041253&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01110-X

DO - 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01110-X

M3 - Article

C2 - 12013542

AN - SCOPUS:0037041253

VL - 288

SP - 141

EP - 153

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

IS - 1-2

ER -