Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river

Juliet Stromberg, P. B. Shafroth, A. F. Hazelton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Bill Williams (Arizona) is a regulated dryland river that is being managed, in part, for biodiversity via flow management. To inform management, we contrasted riparian plant communities between the Bill Williams and an upstream free-flowing tributary (Santa Maria). Goals of a first study (1996-1997) were to identify environmental controls on herbaceous species richness and compare richness among forest types. Analyses revealed that herbaceous species richness was negatively related to woody stem density, basal area and litter cover and positively related to light levels. Introduced Tamarix spp. was more frequent at the Bill Williams, but all three main forest types (Tamarix, Salix/Populus, Prosopis) had low understory richness, as well as high stem density and low light, on the Bill Williams as compared to the Santa Maria. The few edaphic differences between rivers (higher salinity at Bill Williams) had only weak connections with richness. A second study (2006-2007) focused on floristic richness at larger spatial scales. It revealed that during spring, and for the study cumulatively (spring and fall samplings combined), the riparian zone of the unregulated river had considerably more plant species. Annuals (vs. herbaceous perennials and woody species) showed the largest between-river difference. Relative richness of exotic (vs. native) species did not differ. We conclude that: (1) The legacy of reduced scouring frequency and extent at the Bill Williams has reduced the open space available for colonization by annuals; and (2) Change in forest biomass structure, more so than change in forest composition, is the major driver of changes in plant species richness along this flow-altered river. Our study informs dryland river management options by revealing trade-offs that exist between forest biomass structure and plant species richness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-159
Number of pages17
JournalRiver Research and Applications
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012

Fingerprint

Rivers
species richness
river
stem
Biomass
river management
Salix
riparian zone
biomass
open space
river flow
basal area
floristics
Biodiversity
native species
understory
plant community
tributary
litter
colonization

Keywords

  • Dryland river
  • Flood disturbance
  • Flow management
  • Plant species richness
  • Populus
  • Riparian vegetation
  • Salix
  • Tamarix

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Water Science and Technology

Cite this

Stromberg, J., Shafroth, P. B., & Hazelton, A. F. (2012). Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river. River Research and Applications, 28(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1449

Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river. / Stromberg, Juliet; Shafroth, P. B.; Hazelton, A. F.

In: River Research and Applications, Vol. 28, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 143-159.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stromberg, J, Shafroth, PB & Hazelton, AF 2012, 'Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river', River Research and Applications, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1449
Stromberg, Juliet ; Shafroth, P. B. ; Hazelton, A. F. / Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river. In: River Research and Applications. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 143-159.
@article{fcb87270248d438b9277b5d93c976067,
title = "Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river",
abstract = "The Bill Williams (Arizona) is a regulated dryland river that is being managed, in part, for biodiversity via flow management. To inform management, we contrasted riparian plant communities between the Bill Williams and an upstream free-flowing tributary (Santa Maria). Goals of a first study (1996-1997) were to identify environmental controls on herbaceous species richness and compare richness among forest types. Analyses revealed that herbaceous species richness was negatively related to woody stem density, basal area and litter cover and positively related to light levels. Introduced Tamarix spp. was more frequent at the Bill Williams, but all three main forest types (Tamarix, Salix/Populus, Prosopis) had low understory richness, as well as high stem density and low light, on the Bill Williams as compared to the Santa Maria. The few edaphic differences between rivers (higher salinity at Bill Williams) had only weak connections with richness. A second study (2006-2007) focused on floristic richness at larger spatial scales. It revealed that during spring, and for the study cumulatively (spring and fall samplings combined), the riparian zone of the unregulated river had considerably more plant species. Annuals (vs. herbaceous perennials and woody species) showed the largest between-river difference. Relative richness of exotic (vs. native) species did not differ. We conclude that: (1) The legacy of reduced scouring frequency and extent at the Bill Williams has reduced the open space available for colonization by annuals; and (2) Change in forest biomass structure, more so than change in forest composition, is the major driver of changes in plant species richness along this flow-altered river. Our study informs dryland river management options by revealing trade-offs that exist between forest biomass structure and plant species richness.",
keywords = "Dryland river, Flood disturbance, Flow management, Plant species richness, Populus, Riparian vegetation, Salix, Tamarix",
author = "Juliet Stromberg and Shafroth, {P. B.} and Hazelton, {A. F.}",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1002/rra.1449",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "143--159",
journal = "River Research and Applications",
issn = "1535-1459",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Legacies of flood reduction on a dryland river

AU - Stromberg, Juliet

AU - Shafroth, P. B.

AU - Hazelton, A. F.

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - The Bill Williams (Arizona) is a regulated dryland river that is being managed, in part, for biodiversity via flow management. To inform management, we contrasted riparian plant communities between the Bill Williams and an upstream free-flowing tributary (Santa Maria). Goals of a first study (1996-1997) were to identify environmental controls on herbaceous species richness and compare richness among forest types. Analyses revealed that herbaceous species richness was negatively related to woody stem density, basal area and litter cover and positively related to light levels. Introduced Tamarix spp. was more frequent at the Bill Williams, but all three main forest types (Tamarix, Salix/Populus, Prosopis) had low understory richness, as well as high stem density and low light, on the Bill Williams as compared to the Santa Maria. The few edaphic differences between rivers (higher salinity at Bill Williams) had only weak connections with richness. A second study (2006-2007) focused on floristic richness at larger spatial scales. It revealed that during spring, and for the study cumulatively (spring and fall samplings combined), the riparian zone of the unregulated river had considerably more plant species. Annuals (vs. herbaceous perennials and woody species) showed the largest between-river difference. Relative richness of exotic (vs. native) species did not differ. We conclude that: (1) The legacy of reduced scouring frequency and extent at the Bill Williams has reduced the open space available for colonization by annuals; and (2) Change in forest biomass structure, more so than change in forest composition, is the major driver of changes in plant species richness along this flow-altered river. Our study informs dryland river management options by revealing trade-offs that exist between forest biomass structure and plant species richness.

AB - The Bill Williams (Arizona) is a regulated dryland river that is being managed, in part, for biodiversity via flow management. To inform management, we contrasted riparian plant communities between the Bill Williams and an upstream free-flowing tributary (Santa Maria). Goals of a first study (1996-1997) were to identify environmental controls on herbaceous species richness and compare richness among forest types. Analyses revealed that herbaceous species richness was negatively related to woody stem density, basal area and litter cover and positively related to light levels. Introduced Tamarix spp. was more frequent at the Bill Williams, but all three main forest types (Tamarix, Salix/Populus, Prosopis) had low understory richness, as well as high stem density and low light, on the Bill Williams as compared to the Santa Maria. The few edaphic differences between rivers (higher salinity at Bill Williams) had only weak connections with richness. A second study (2006-2007) focused on floristic richness at larger spatial scales. It revealed that during spring, and for the study cumulatively (spring and fall samplings combined), the riparian zone of the unregulated river had considerably more plant species. Annuals (vs. herbaceous perennials and woody species) showed the largest between-river difference. Relative richness of exotic (vs. native) species did not differ. We conclude that: (1) The legacy of reduced scouring frequency and extent at the Bill Williams has reduced the open space available for colonization by annuals; and (2) Change in forest biomass structure, more so than change in forest composition, is the major driver of changes in plant species richness along this flow-altered river. Our study informs dryland river management options by revealing trade-offs that exist between forest biomass structure and plant species richness.

KW - Dryland river

KW - Flood disturbance

KW - Flow management

KW - Plant species richness

KW - Populus

KW - Riparian vegetation

KW - Salix

KW - Tamarix

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856266952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84856266952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/rra.1449

DO - 10.1002/rra.1449

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84856266952

VL - 28

SP - 143

EP - 159

JO - River Research and Applications

JF - River Research and Applications

SN - 1535-1459

IS - 2

ER -