TY - GEN
T1 - Learning user plan preferences obfuscated by feasibility constraints
AU - Li, Nan
AU - Cushing, William
AU - Kambhampati, Subbarao
AU - Yoon, Sungwook
PY - 2009/12/1
Y1 - 2009/12/1
N2 - It has long been recognized that users can have complex preferences on plans. Non-intrusive learning of such preferences by observing the plans executed by the user is an attractive idea. Unfortunately, the executed plans are often not a true representation of user preferences, as they result from the interaction between user preferences and feasibility constraints. In the travel planning scenario, a user whose true preference is to travel by a plane may well be frequently observed traveling by car because of feasibility constraints (perhaps the user is a poor graduate student). In this work, we describe a novel method for learning true user preferences obfuscated by such feasibility constraints. Our base learner induces probabilistic hierarchical task networks (pHTNs) from sets of training plans. Our approach is to rescale the input so that it represents the user's preference distribution on plans rather than the observed distribution on plans.
AB - It has long been recognized that users can have complex preferences on plans. Non-intrusive learning of such preferences by observing the plans executed by the user is an attractive idea. Unfortunately, the executed plans are often not a true representation of user preferences, as they result from the interaction between user preferences and feasibility constraints. In the travel planning scenario, a user whose true preference is to travel by a plane may well be frequently observed traveling by car because of feasibility constraints (perhaps the user is a poor graduate student). In this work, we describe a novel method for learning true user preferences obfuscated by such feasibility constraints. Our base learner induces probabilistic hierarchical task networks (pHTNs) from sets of training plans. Our approach is to rescale the input so that it represents the user's preference distribution on plans rather than the observed distribution on plans.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650627255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650627255&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78650627255
SN - 9781577354062
T3 - ICAPS 2009 - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
SP - 370
EP - 373
BT - ICAPS 2009 - Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling
T2 - 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2009
Y2 - 19 September 2009 through 23 September 2009
ER -