TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning through evaluation – A tentative evaluative scheme for sustainability transition experiments
AU - Luederitz, Christopher
AU - Schäpke, Niko
AU - Wiek, Arnim
AU - Lang, Daniel J.
AU - Bergmann, Matthias
AU - Bos, Joannette J.
AU - Burch, Sarah
AU - Davies, Anna
AU - Evans, James
AU - König, Ariane
AU - Farrelly, Megan A.
AU - Forrest, Nigel
AU - Frantzeskaki, Niki
AU - Gibson, Robert B.
AU - Kay, Braden
AU - Loorbach, Derk
AU - McCormick, Kes
AU - Parodi, Oliver
AU - Rauschmayer, Felix
AU - Schneidewind, Uwe
AU - Stauffacher, Michael
AU - Stelzer, Franziska
AU - Trencher, Gregory
AU - Venjakob, Johannes
AU - Vergragt, Philip J.
AU - von Wehrden, Henrik
AU - Westley, Frances R.
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for the comments from David Jacobs, Paula Kivimaa, Adrian Smith and three reviewers on previous versions of this article. Furthermore, we want to thank Philip Bernert for the helpful assistance. The final version also benefitted from suggestions and inputs at four international conferences including the INOGOV Workshop 2015 in Helsinki, Finland, the ESEE 2015 Conference in Leeds, UK, the IST 2015 Conference in Brighton, UK, and the Transformation 2015 Conference in Stockholm, Sweden. NS and DJL acknowledge support by the Ministry for Science, Research and Culture of Baden-Württemberg, Germany . AW acknowledges support by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-1462086 , DMUU: DCDC III: Transformational Solutions for Urban Water Sustainability Transitions in the Colorado River Basin .
Funding Information:
We are grateful for the comments from David Jacobs, Paula Kivimaa, Adrian Smith and three reviewers on previous versions of this article. Furthermore, we want to thank Philip Bernert for the helpful assistance. The final version also benefitted from suggestions and inputs at four international conferences including the INOGOV Workshop 2015 in Helsinki, Finland, the ESEE 2015 Conference in Leeds, UK, the IST 2015 Conference in Brighton, UK, and the Transformation 2015 Conference in Stockholm, Sweden. NS and DJL acknowledge support by the Ministry for Science, Research and Culture of Baden-W?rttemberg, Germany. AW acknowledges support by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-1462086, DMUU: DCDC III: Transformational Solutions for Urban Water Sustainability Transitions in the Colorado River Basin.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/12/15
Y1 - 2017/12/15
N2 - Transitions towards sustainability are urgently needed to address the interconnected challenges of economic development, ecological integrity, and social justice, from local to global scales. Around the world, collaborative science-society initiatives are forming to conduct experiments in support of sustainability transitions. Such experiments, if carefully designed, provide significant learning opportunities for making progress on transition efforts. Yet, there is no broadly applicable evaluative scheme available to capture this critical information across a large number of cases, and to guide the design of transition experiments. To address this gap, the article develops such a scheme, in a tentative form, drawing on evaluative research and sustainability transitions scholarship, alongside insights from empirical cases. We critically discuss the scheme's key features of being generic, comprehensive, operational, and formative. Furthermore, we invite scholars and practitioners to apply, reflect and further develop the proposed tentative scheme – making evaluation and experiments objects of learning.
AB - Transitions towards sustainability are urgently needed to address the interconnected challenges of economic development, ecological integrity, and social justice, from local to global scales. Around the world, collaborative science-society initiatives are forming to conduct experiments in support of sustainability transitions. Such experiments, if carefully designed, provide significant learning opportunities for making progress on transition efforts. Yet, there is no broadly applicable evaluative scheme available to capture this critical information across a large number of cases, and to guide the design of transition experiments. To address this gap, the article develops such a scheme, in a tentative form, drawing on evaluative research and sustainability transitions scholarship, alongside insights from empirical cases. We critically discuss the scheme's key features of being generic, comprehensive, operational, and formative. Furthermore, we invite scholars and practitioners to apply, reflect and further develop the proposed tentative scheme – making evaluation and experiments objects of learning.
KW - Analytical-evaluative framework
KW - Real-world laboratories
KW - Sustainability assessment
KW - Sustainability transformation
KW - Sustainability transition experiments
KW - Transition labs
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84995542947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84995542947&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.005
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84995542947
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 169
SP - 61
EP - 76
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
ER -