Learning, interactional, and motivational outcomes in one-to-one synchronous computer-mediated versus face-to-face tutoring

Stephanie Ann Siler, Kurt VanLehn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Face-to-face (FTF) human-human tutoring has ranked among the most effective forms of instruction. However, because computer-mediated (CM) tutoring is becoming increasingly common, it is instructive to evaluate its effectiveness relative to face-to-face tutoring. Does the lack of spoken, face-to-face interaction affect learning gains and motivation? In this study, pairs of undergraduate students and tutors worked on physics problems either face-to-face or via a typed chat window. Although face-to-face tutoring took less time, students learned equal amounts in the two conditions. In both conditions, short tutor turns were associated with increased student learning. In both conditions, students who were more active had higher learning gains. Students in the CM condition who gained more produced more words per conversational turn. The same relationship was found in the FTF context only after back-channel feedback was taken out. A more direct measure of student activity, the relative proportion of student-initiated actions in problem-solving, was more strongly associated with student learning in the FTF context, but only for students with higher verbal SAT scores. Of the motivational variables we investigated, only students' ability goals (i.e. wanting to demonstrate one's ability to others) were influenced somewhat differently by the two contexts. These results suggest that although the difference in communication medium changes superficial characteristics of the tutoring such as its duration, most of the important pedagogical characteristics - learning gains, tutorial interaction, the activity measures associated with learning gains, and student motivation - were not affected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-102
Number of pages30
JournalInternational Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Volume19
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Students
learning
student
tutor
communication medium
chat
ability
interaction
physics
Physics
instruction
Feedback
lack
Communication

Keywords

  • Computer-mediated
  • Face-to-face
  • Motivation
  • Tutoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Education

Cite this

@article{fb79b67dd4ff416398282c3aaab1054b,
title = "Learning, interactional, and motivational outcomes in one-to-one synchronous computer-mediated versus face-to-face tutoring",
abstract = "Face-to-face (FTF) human-human tutoring has ranked among the most effective forms of instruction. However, because computer-mediated (CM) tutoring is becoming increasingly common, it is instructive to evaluate its effectiveness relative to face-to-face tutoring. Does the lack of spoken, face-to-face interaction affect learning gains and motivation? In this study, pairs of undergraduate students and tutors worked on physics problems either face-to-face or via a typed chat window. Although face-to-face tutoring took less time, students learned equal amounts in the two conditions. In both conditions, short tutor turns were associated with increased student learning. In both conditions, students who were more active had higher learning gains. Students in the CM condition who gained more produced more words per conversational turn. The same relationship was found in the FTF context only after back-channel feedback was taken out. A more direct measure of student activity, the relative proportion of student-initiated actions in problem-solving, was more strongly associated with student learning in the FTF context, but only for students with higher verbal SAT scores. Of the motivational variables we investigated, only students' ability goals (i.e. wanting to demonstrate one's ability to others) were influenced somewhat differently by the two contexts. These results suggest that although the difference in communication medium changes superficial characteristics of the tutoring such as its duration, most of the important pedagogical characteristics - learning gains, tutorial interaction, the activity measures associated with learning gains, and student motivation - were not affected.",
keywords = "Computer-mediated, Face-to-face, Motivation, Tutoring",
author = "Siler, {Stephanie Ann} and Kurt VanLehn",
year = "2009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "73--102",
journal = "International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education",
issn = "1560-4292",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning, interactional, and motivational outcomes in one-to-one synchronous computer-mediated versus face-to-face tutoring

AU - Siler, Stephanie Ann

AU - VanLehn, Kurt

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Face-to-face (FTF) human-human tutoring has ranked among the most effective forms of instruction. However, because computer-mediated (CM) tutoring is becoming increasingly common, it is instructive to evaluate its effectiveness relative to face-to-face tutoring. Does the lack of spoken, face-to-face interaction affect learning gains and motivation? In this study, pairs of undergraduate students and tutors worked on physics problems either face-to-face or via a typed chat window. Although face-to-face tutoring took less time, students learned equal amounts in the two conditions. In both conditions, short tutor turns were associated with increased student learning. In both conditions, students who were more active had higher learning gains. Students in the CM condition who gained more produced more words per conversational turn. The same relationship was found in the FTF context only after back-channel feedback was taken out. A more direct measure of student activity, the relative proportion of student-initiated actions in problem-solving, was more strongly associated with student learning in the FTF context, but only for students with higher verbal SAT scores. Of the motivational variables we investigated, only students' ability goals (i.e. wanting to demonstrate one's ability to others) were influenced somewhat differently by the two contexts. These results suggest that although the difference in communication medium changes superficial characteristics of the tutoring such as its duration, most of the important pedagogical characteristics - learning gains, tutorial interaction, the activity measures associated with learning gains, and student motivation - were not affected.

AB - Face-to-face (FTF) human-human tutoring has ranked among the most effective forms of instruction. However, because computer-mediated (CM) tutoring is becoming increasingly common, it is instructive to evaluate its effectiveness relative to face-to-face tutoring. Does the lack of spoken, face-to-face interaction affect learning gains and motivation? In this study, pairs of undergraduate students and tutors worked on physics problems either face-to-face or via a typed chat window. Although face-to-face tutoring took less time, students learned equal amounts in the two conditions. In both conditions, short tutor turns were associated with increased student learning. In both conditions, students who were more active had higher learning gains. Students in the CM condition who gained more produced more words per conversational turn. The same relationship was found in the FTF context only after back-channel feedback was taken out. A more direct measure of student activity, the relative proportion of student-initiated actions in problem-solving, was more strongly associated with student learning in the FTF context, but only for students with higher verbal SAT scores. Of the motivational variables we investigated, only students' ability goals (i.e. wanting to demonstrate one's ability to others) were influenced somewhat differently by the two contexts. These results suggest that although the difference in communication medium changes superficial characteristics of the tutoring such as its duration, most of the important pedagogical characteristics - learning gains, tutorial interaction, the activity measures associated with learning gains, and student motivation - were not affected.

KW - Computer-mediated

KW - Face-to-face

KW - Motivation

KW - Tutoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=73449143500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=73449143500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 73

EP - 102

JO - International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

JF - International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

SN - 1560-4292

IS - 1

ER -