Abstract

One of the classic instructional effects associated with the Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) is the worked-example effect in cognitive skill acquisition (see Chapters 2 and 3, this volume; Paas & van Gog, 2006). Worked-out examples consist of a problem formulation, solution steps, and the final solution itself. They are commonplace in the instructional material pertaining to well-structured domains such as mathematics or physics (see Figure 5.1 for an exemplary worked-out example). When CLT researchers discuss “learning from worked-out examples,” they typically mean that after the introduction of one or more domain principles (e.g., mathematical theorem, physics law), learners should be presented with several examples rather than a single example, as it is commonly the case. Despite this emphasis on learning from examples, researchers working in this area acknowledge the importance of requiring learners to solve problems later on in cognitive skill acquisition so that they can reach proficiency in the domain they are studying. In this chapter, we elaborate the theoretical assumptions and empirical findings involving the studying of worked-out examples and learning by problem solving in different phases of cognitive skill acquisition. Rather than summarizing the extensive literature on example-based learning and its implications for instructional design (for overviews, see Atkinson, Derry, Renkl, & Wortham, 2000, and Renkl, 2005), we instead focus on addressing the issues of: (a) when it is best to study worked-out solutions, (b) when it is best to solve problems, and (c) how the transition between these two learning methods should be structured.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCognitive Load Theory
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages89-108
Number of pages20
ISBN (Print)9780511844744, 9780521860239
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2010

Fingerprint

Learning
Physics
Research Personnel
Mathematics
Research Design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. (2010). Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. In Cognitive Load Theory (pp. 89-108). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007

Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. / Renkl, Alexander; Atkinson, Robert.

Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 89-108.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Renkl, A & Atkinson, R 2010, Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. in Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, pp. 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007
Renkl A, Atkinson R. Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. In Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press. 2010. p. 89-108 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007
Renkl, Alexander ; Atkinson, Robert. / Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving. Cognitive Load Theory. Cambridge University Press, 2010. pp. 89-108
@inbook{6e697e93888d43d487cf49ff131216b8,
title = "Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving",
abstract = "One of the classic instructional effects associated with the Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) is the worked-example effect in cognitive skill acquisition (see Chapters 2 and 3, this volume; Paas & van Gog, 2006). Worked-out examples consist of a problem formulation, solution steps, and the final solution itself. They are commonplace in the instructional material pertaining to well-structured domains such as mathematics or physics (see Figure 5.1 for an exemplary worked-out example). When CLT researchers discuss “learning from worked-out examples,” they typically mean that after the introduction of one or more domain principles (e.g., mathematical theorem, physics law), learners should be presented with several examples rather than a single example, as it is commonly the case. Despite this emphasis on learning from examples, researchers working in this area acknowledge the importance of requiring learners to solve problems later on in cognitive skill acquisition so that they can reach proficiency in the domain they are studying. In this chapter, we elaborate the theoretical assumptions and empirical findings involving the studying of worked-out examples and learning by problem solving in different phases of cognitive skill acquisition. Rather than summarizing the extensive literature on example-based learning and its implications for instructional design (for overviews, see Atkinson, Derry, Renkl, & Wortham, 2000, and Renkl, 2005), we instead focus on addressing the issues of: (a) when it is best to study worked-out solutions, (b) when it is best to solve problems, and (c) how the transition between these two learning methods should be structured.",
author = "Alexander Renkl and Robert Atkinson",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511844744",
pages = "89--108",
booktitle = "Cognitive Load Theory",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving

AU - Renkl, Alexander

AU - Atkinson, Robert

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - One of the classic instructional effects associated with the Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) is the worked-example effect in cognitive skill acquisition (see Chapters 2 and 3, this volume; Paas & van Gog, 2006). Worked-out examples consist of a problem formulation, solution steps, and the final solution itself. They are commonplace in the instructional material pertaining to well-structured domains such as mathematics or physics (see Figure 5.1 for an exemplary worked-out example). When CLT researchers discuss “learning from worked-out examples,” they typically mean that after the introduction of one or more domain principles (e.g., mathematical theorem, physics law), learners should be presented with several examples rather than a single example, as it is commonly the case. Despite this emphasis on learning from examples, researchers working in this area acknowledge the importance of requiring learners to solve problems later on in cognitive skill acquisition so that they can reach proficiency in the domain they are studying. In this chapter, we elaborate the theoretical assumptions and empirical findings involving the studying of worked-out examples and learning by problem solving in different phases of cognitive skill acquisition. Rather than summarizing the extensive literature on example-based learning and its implications for instructional design (for overviews, see Atkinson, Derry, Renkl, & Wortham, 2000, and Renkl, 2005), we instead focus on addressing the issues of: (a) when it is best to study worked-out solutions, (b) when it is best to solve problems, and (c) how the transition between these two learning methods should be structured.

AB - One of the classic instructional effects associated with the Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) is the worked-example effect in cognitive skill acquisition (see Chapters 2 and 3, this volume; Paas & van Gog, 2006). Worked-out examples consist of a problem formulation, solution steps, and the final solution itself. They are commonplace in the instructional material pertaining to well-structured domains such as mathematics or physics (see Figure 5.1 for an exemplary worked-out example). When CLT researchers discuss “learning from worked-out examples,” they typically mean that after the introduction of one or more domain principles (e.g., mathematical theorem, physics law), learners should be presented with several examples rather than a single example, as it is commonly the case. Despite this emphasis on learning from examples, researchers working in this area acknowledge the importance of requiring learners to solve problems later on in cognitive skill acquisition so that they can reach proficiency in the domain they are studying. In this chapter, we elaborate the theoretical assumptions and empirical findings involving the studying of worked-out examples and learning by problem solving in different phases of cognitive skill acquisition. Rather than summarizing the extensive literature on example-based learning and its implications for instructional design (for overviews, see Atkinson, Derry, Renkl, & Wortham, 2000, and Renkl, 2005), we instead focus on addressing the issues of: (a) when it is best to study worked-out solutions, (b) when it is best to solve problems, and (c) how the transition between these two learning methods should be structured.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928075653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928075653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511844744.007

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84928075653

SN - 9780511844744

SN - 9780521860239

SP - 89

EP - 108

BT - Cognitive Load Theory

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -