Learning from what doesn’t work in teacher evaluation

Kevin Close, Audrey Beardsley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent lawsuits reveal common mistakes plaguing current teacher evaluation systems. Drawing on arguments in court documents for prominent cases, the authors find that evaluation systems using value-added measures (VAM) suffer from a) inconsistent and unreliable teacher ratings, b) bias toward and against teachers of certain types of students, c) easy opportunities for administrators to game the system, and d) a lack of transparency. They urge others to engage with these (and other) arguments to design better, more valid, more useful, and ultimately more defensible teacher evaluation systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-19
Number of pages5
JournalPhi Delta Kappan
Volume100
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

teacher
evaluation
learning
teacher rating
lawsuit
value added
transparency
lack
trend
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Learning from what doesn’t work in teacher evaluation. / Close, Kevin; Beardsley, Audrey.

In: Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 100, No. 1, 01.09.2018, p. 15-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1f84e850bb8d4c16b62f5ce00b78045f,
title = "Learning from what doesn’t work in teacher evaluation",
abstract = "Recent lawsuits reveal common mistakes plaguing current teacher evaluation systems. Drawing on arguments in court documents for prominent cases, the authors find that evaluation systems using value-added measures (VAM) suffer from a) inconsistent and unreliable teacher ratings, b) bias toward and against teachers of certain types of students, c) easy opportunities for administrators to game the system, and d) a lack of transparency. They urge others to engage with these (and other) arguments to design better, more valid, more useful, and ultimately more defensible teacher evaluation systems.",
author = "Kevin Close and Audrey Beardsley",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0031721718797115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "100",
pages = "15--19",
journal = "Phi Delta Kappan",
issn = "0031-7217",
publisher = "Phi Delta Kappa Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from what doesn’t work in teacher evaluation

AU - Close, Kevin

AU - Beardsley, Audrey

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Recent lawsuits reveal common mistakes plaguing current teacher evaluation systems. Drawing on arguments in court documents for prominent cases, the authors find that evaluation systems using value-added measures (VAM) suffer from a) inconsistent and unreliable teacher ratings, b) bias toward and against teachers of certain types of students, c) easy opportunities for administrators to game the system, and d) a lack of transparency. They urge others to engage with these (and other) arguments to design better, more valid, more useful, and ultimately more defensible teacher evaluation systems.

AB - Recent lawsuits reveal common mistakes plaguing current teacher evaluation systems. Drawing on arguments in court documents for prominent cases, the authors find that evaluation systems using value-added measures (VAM) suffer from a) inconsistent and unreliable teacher ratings, b) bias toward and against teachers of certain types of students, c) easy opportunities for administrators to game the system, and d) a lack of transparency. They urge others to engage with these (and other) arguments to design better, more valid, more useful, and ultimately more defensible teacher evaluation systems.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052692453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052692453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0031721718797115

DO - 10.1177/0031721718797115

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 15

EP - 19

JO - Phi Delta Kappan

JF - Phi Delta Kappan

SN - 0031-7217

IS - 1

ER -