Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts

M. Granger Morgan, Robin Cantor, William C. Clark, Ann Fisher, Henry D. Jacoby, Anthony C. Janetos, Ann Kinzig, Jerry Melillo, Roger B. Street, Thomas J. Wilbanks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The U.S. National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change was a federally coordinated nationwide effort that involved thousands of experts and stakeholders. To draw lessons from this effort, the 10 authors of this paper, half of whom were not involved in the Assessment, developed and administered an extensive survey, prepared a series of working papers, and conducted an invitational workshop in Washington, DC, on April 29, 2004. Considering all these sources, the authors conclude that the Assessment was largely successful in implementing its basic design of distributed stakeholder involvement and in achieving its basic objectives. Future assessments could be significantly improved if greater attention were devoted to developing a collective understanding of objectives, preparing guidance materials and providing training for assessment participants, developing a budgeting mechanism which would allow greater freedom in allocating resources across various assessment activities, and creating an environment in which assessments were part of an ongoing process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9023-9032
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Science and Technology
Volume39
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2005

Fingerprint

Budget control
Climate change
stakeholder
learning
climate change
climate
resource
freedom
material

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

Morgan, M. G., Cantor, R., Clark, W. C., Fisher, A., Jacoby, H. D., Janetos, A. C., ... Wilbanks, T. J. (2005). Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(23), 9023-9032. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050865i

Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts. / Morgan, M. Granger; Cantor, Robin; Clark, William C.; Fisher, Ann; Jacoby, Henry D.; Janetos, Anthony C.; Kinzig, Ann; Melillo, Jerry; Street, Roger B.; Wilbanks, Thomas J.

In: Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 39, No. 23, 01.12.2005, p. 9023-9032.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Morgan, MG, Cantor, R, Clark, WC, Fisher, A, Jacoby, HD, Janetos, AC, Kinzig, A, Melillo, J, Street, RB & Wilbanks, TJ 2005, 'Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts', Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 23, pp. 9023-9032. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050865i
Morgan MG, Cantor R, Clark WC, Fisher A, Jacoby HD, Janetos AC et al. Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts. Environmental Science and Technology. 2005 Dec 1;39(23):9023-9032. https://doi.org/10.1021/es050865i
Morgan, M. Granger ; Cantor, Robin ; Clark, William C. ; Fisher, Ann ; Jacoby, Henry D. ; Janetos, Anthony C. ; Kinzig, Ann ; Melillo, Jerry ; Street, Roger B. ; Wilbanks, Thomas J. / Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts. In: Environmental Science and Technology. 2005 ; Vol. 39, No. 23. pp. 9023-9032.
@article{2942c721dbf64db99b31bcba34899564,
title = "Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts",
abstract = "The U.S. National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change was a federally coordinated nationwide effort that involved thousands of experts and stakeholders. To draw lessons from this effort, the 10 authors of this paper, half of whom were not involved in the Assessment, developed and administered an extensive survey, prepared a series of working papers, and conducted an invitational workshop in Washington, DC, on April 29, 2004. Considering all these sources, the authors conclude that the Assessment was largely successful in implementing its basic design of distributed stakeholder involvement and in achieving its basic objectives. Future assessments could be significantly improved if greater attention were devoted to developing a collective understanding of objectives, preparing guidance materials and providing training for assessment participants, developing a budgeting mechanism which would allow greater freedom in allocating resources across various assessment activities, and creating an environment in which assessments were part of an ongoing process.",
author = "Morgan, {M. Granger} and Robin Cantor and Clark, {William C.} and Ann Fisher and Jacoby, {Henry D.} and Janetos, {Anthony C.} and Ann Kinzig and Jerry Melillo and Street, {Roger B.} and Wilbanks, {Thomas J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1021/es050865i",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "9023--9032",
journal = "Environmental Science & Technology",
issn = "0013-936X",
publisher = "American Chemical Society",
number = "23",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from the U.S. National Assessment of Climate Change impacts

AU - Morgan, M. Granger

AU - Cantor, Robin

AU - Clark, William C.

AU - Fisher, Ann

AU - Jacoby, Henry D.

AU - Janetos, Anthony C.

AU - Kinzig, Ann

AU - Melillo, Jerry

AU - Street, Roger B.

AU - Wilbanks, Thomas J.

PY - 2005/12/1

Y1 - 2005/12/1

N2 - The U.S. National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change was a federally coordinated nationwide effort that involved thousands of experts and stakeholders. To draw lessons from this effort, the 10 authors of this paper, half of whom were not involved in the Assessment, developed and administered an extensive survey, prepared a series of working papers, and conducted an invitational workshop in Washington, DC, on April 29, 2004. Considering all these sources, the authors conclude that the Assessment was largely successful in implementing its basic design of distributed stakeholder involvement and in achieving its basic objectives. Future assessments could be significantly improved if greater attention were devoted to developing a collective understanding of objectives, preparing guidance materials and providing training for assessment participants, developing a budgeting mechanism which would allow greater freedom in allocating resources across various assessment activities, and creating an environment in which assessments were part of an ongoing process.

AB - The U.S. National Assessment of the Potential Consequences of Climate Variability and Change was a federally coordinated nationwide effort that involved thousands of experts and stakeholders. To draw lessons from this effort, the 10 authors of this paper, half of whom were not involved in the Assessment, developed and administered an extensive survey, prepared a series of working papers, and conducted an invitational workshop in Washington, DC, on April 29, 2004. Considering all these sources, the authors conclude that the Assessment was largely successful in implementing its basic design of distributed stakeholder involvement and in achieving its basic objectives. Future assessments could be significantly improved if greater attention were devoted to developing a collective understanding of objectives, preparing guidance materials and providing training for assessment participants, developing a budgeting mechanism which would allow greater freedom in allocating resources across various assessment activities, and creating an environment in which assessments were part of an ongoing process.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=28444460354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=28444460354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1021/es050865i

DO - 10.1021/es050865i

M3 - Article

C2 - 16382921

AN - SCOPUS:28444460354

VL - 39

SP - 9023

EP - 9032

JO - Environmental Science & Technology

JF - Environmental Science & Technology

SN - 0013-936X

IS - 23

ER -