Learning from fukushima

Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer, Christopher Jones, Krishanu Saha, Sheila Jasanoff

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The nuclear failure at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors in March 2011 has prompted many people to turn to Japan to understand what went wrong and how to prevent such an event from recurring. Some point to the relatively minor release of radioactive material and the outdated design of the reactors to argue that nuclear power is safe, whereas others take Fukushima as blatant evidence that nuclear power remains unsafe. Germany responded to Fukushima by accelerating its nuclear exit, but France reaffirmed its strong commitment to nuclear energy. Moreover, as with previous nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, lessons tend to fall within one of two categories: those that blame technology, such as the reactor design, and those that blame social factors, such as poorly conceived regulations or corporate greed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)79-84
Number of pages6
JournalIssues in Science and Technology
Volume28
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

nuclear power
nuclear energy
learning
social factors
accident
Japan
France
commitment
regulation
event
evidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Cite this

Pfotenhauer, S. M., Jones, C., Saha, K., & Jasanoff, S. (2012). Learning from fukushima. Issues in Science and Technology, 28(3), 79-84.

Learning from fukushima. / Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M.; Jones, Christopher; Saha, Krishanu; Jasanoff, Sheila.

In: Issues in Science and Technology, Vol. 28, No. 3, 03.2012, p. 79-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pfotenhauer, SM, Jones, C, Saha, K & Jasanoff, S 2012, 'Learning from fukushima', Issues in Science and Technology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 79-84.
Pfotenhauer SM, Jones C, Saha K, Jasanoff S. Learning from fukushima. Issues in Science and Technology. 2012 Mar;28(3):79-84.
Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M. ; Jones, Christopher ; Saha, Krishanu ; Jasanoff, Sheila. / Learning from fukushima. In: Issues in Science and Technology. 2012 ; Vol. 28, No. 3. pp. 79-84.
@article{b0556c62a4b4478b8a17226079046e9c,
title = "Learning from fukushima",
abstract = "The nuclear failure at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors in March 2011 has prompted many people to turn to Japan to understand what went wrong and how to prevent such an event from recurring. Some point to the relatively minor release of radioactive material and the outdated design of the reactors to argue that nuclear power is safe, whereas others take Fukushima as blatant evidence that nuclear power remains unsafe. Germany responded to Fukushima by accelerating its nuclear exit, but France reaffirmed its strong commitment to nuclear energy. Moreover, as with previous nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, lessons tend to fall within one of two categories: those that blame technology, such as the reactor design, and those that blame social factors, such as poorly conceived regulations or corporate greed.",
author = "Pfotenhauer, {Sebastian M.} and Christopher Jones and Krishanu Saha and Sheila Jasanoff",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "79--84",
journal = "Issues in Science and Technology",
issn = "0748-5492",
publisher = "University of Texas at Dallas",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning from fukushima

AU - Pfotenhauer, Sebastian M.

AU - Jones, Christopher

AU - Saha, Krishanu

AU - Jasanoff, Sheila

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - The nuclear failure at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors in March 2011 has prompted many people to turn to Japan to understand what went wrong and how to prevent such an event from recurring. Some point to the relatively minor release of radioactive material and the outdated design of the reactors to argue that nuclear power is safe, whereas others take Fukushima as blatant evidence that nuclear power remains unsafe. Germany responded to Fukushima by accelerating its nuclear exit, but France reaffirmed its strong commitment to nuclear energy. Moreover, as with previous nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, lessons tend to fall within one of two categories: those that blame technology, such as the reactor design, and those that blame social factors, such as poorly conceived regulations or corporate greed.

AB - The nuclear failure at the Fukushima Daiichi reactors in March 2011 has prompted many people to turn to Japan to understand what went wrong and how to prevent such an event from recurring. Some point to the relatively minor release of radioactive material and the outdated design of the reactors to argue that nuclear power is safe, whereas others take Fukushima as blatant evidence that nuclear power remains unsafe. Germany responded to Fukushima by accelerating its nuclear exit, but France reaffirmed its strong commitment to nuclear energy. Moreover, as with previous nuclear accidents at Three Mile Island and Chernobyl, lessons tend to fall within one of two categories: those that blame technology, such as the reactor design, and those that blame social factors, such as poorly conceived regulations or corporate greed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878326283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878326283&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 79

EP - 84

JO - Issues in Science and Technology

JF - Issues in Science and Technology

SN - 0748-5492

IS - 3

ER -