Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation

Charles A. MacArthur, Stephen Graham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

176 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate how different methods of text production affect the writing processes and products of LD students. Eleven fifth and sixth grade LD students, selected for their experience with word processing, composed and revised stories using handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Dictated stories were significantly longer, were of higher quality, and had fewer grammatical errors than handwritten or word processed stories. The handwritten and word processed stories did not differ on any of the product measures, including length, quality, story structure, mechanical or grammatical errors, vocabulary, or mean T-unit length. However, differences between handwriting and word processing were found on the process measures of composing rate and revisions. Implications for writing in struction with LD students are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)22-42
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Handwriting
Word Processing
handwriting
Learning
Students
learning
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Vocabulary
student
vocabulary
school grade
experience

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production : Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. / MacArthur, Charles A.; Graham, Stephen.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1987, p. 22-42.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de9b6a7ae05d41278824cc2fdee2844d,
title = "Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to investigate how different methods of text production affect the writing processes and products of LD students. Eleven fifth and sixth grade LD students, selected for their experience with word processing, composed and revised stories using handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Dictated stories were significantly longer, were of higher quality, and had fewer grammatical errors than handwritten or word processed stories. The handwritten and word processed stories did not differ on any of the product measures, including length, quality, story structure, mechanical or grammatical errors, vocabulary, or mean T-unit length. However, differences between handwriting and word processing were found on the process measures of composing rate and revisions. Implications for writing in struction with LD students are discussed.",
author = "MacArthur, {Charles A.} and Stephen Graham",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1177/002246698702100304",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "22--42",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning disabled students' composing under three methods of text production

T2 - Handwriting, word processing, and dictation

AU - MacArthur, Charles A.

AU - Graham, Stephen

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - The purpose of this study was to investigate how different methods of text production affect the writing processes and products of LD students. Eleven fifth and sixth grade LD students, selected for their experience with word processing, composed and revised stories using handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Dictated stories were significantly longer, were of higher quality, and had fewer grammatical errors than handwritten or word processed stories. The handwritten and word processed stories did not differ on any of the product measures, including length, quality, story structure, mechanical or grammatical errors, vocabulary, or mean T-unit length. However, differences between handwriting and word processing were found on the process measures of composing rate and revisions. Implications for writing in struction with LD students are discussed.

AB - The purpose of this study was to investigate how different methods of text production affect the writing processes and products of LD students. Eleven fifth and sixth grade LD students, selected for their experience with word processing, composed and revised stories using handwriting, dictation, and word processing. Dictated stories were significantly longer, were of higher quality, and had fewer grammatical errors than handwritten or word processed stories. The handwritten and word processed stories did not differ on any of the product measures, including length, quality, story structure, mechanical or grammatical errors, vocabulary, or mean T-unit length. However, differences between handwriting and word processing were found on the process measures of composing rate and revisions. Implications for writing in struction with LD students are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970671483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970671483&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246698702100304

DO - 10.1177/002246698702100304

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970671483

VL - 21

SP - 22

EP - 42

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -