Leading multiple teams: Average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness

Margaret Luciano, John E. Mathieu, Thomas M. Ruddy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

External leaders continue to be an important source of influence even when teams are empowered, but it is not always clear how they do so. Extending research on structurally empowered teams, we recognize that teams' external leaders are often responsible for multiple teams. We adopt a multilevel approach to model external leader influences at both the team level and the external leader level of analysis. In doing so, we distinguish the influence of general external leader behaviors (i.e., average external leadership) from those that are directed differently toward the teams that they lead (i.e., relative external leadership). Analysis of data collected from 451 individuals, in 101 teams, reporting to 25 external leaders, revealed that both relative and average external leadership related positively to team empowerment. In turn, team empowerment related positively to team performance and member job satisfaction. However, while the indirect effects were all positive, we found that relative external leadership was not directly related to team performance, and average external leadership evidenced a significant negative direct influence. Additionally, relative external leadership exhibited a significant direct positive influence on member job satisfaction as anticipated, whereas average external leadership did not. These findings attest to the value in distinguishing external leaders' behaviors that are exhibited consistently versus differentially across empowered teams. Implications and future directions for the study and management of external leaders overseeing multiple teams are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)322-331
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
Volume99
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Job Satisfaction
Power (Psychology)
Research
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Empowerment
  • External leadership
  • Multilevel
  • Teams

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Leading multiple teams : Average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness. / Luciano, Margaret; Mathieu, John E.; Ruddy, Thomas M.

In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 99, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 322-331.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{474e319ab8cc461082b9cdf75b60668b,
title = "Leading multiple teams: Average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness",
abstract = "External leaders continue to be an important source of influence even when teams are empowered, but it is not always clear how they do so. Extending research on structurally empowered teams, we recognize that teams' external leaders are often responsible for multiple teams. We adopt a multilevel approach to model external leader influences at both the team level and the external leader level of analysis. In doing so, we distinguish the influence of general external leader behaviors (i.e., average external leadership) from those that are directed differently toward the teams that they lead (i.e., relative external leadership). Analysis of data collected from 451 individuals, in 101 teams, reporting to 25 external leaders, revealed that both relative and average external leadership related positively to team empowerment. In turn, team empowerment related positively to team performance and member job satisfaction. However, while the indirect effects were all positive, we found that relative external leadership was not directly related to team performance, and average external leadership evidenced a significant negative direct influence. Additionally, relative external leadership exhibited a significant direct positive influence on member job satisfaction as anticipated, whereas average external leadership did not. These findings attest to the value in distinguishing external leaders' behaviors that are exhibited consistently versus differentially across empowered teams. Implications and future directions for the study and management of external leaders overseeing multiple teams are discussed.",
keywords = "Empowerment, External leadership, Multilevel, Teams",
author = "Margaret Luciano and Mathieu, {John E.} and Ruddy, {Thomas M.}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1037/a0035025",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "322--331",
journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
issn = "0021-9010",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leading multiple teams

T2 - Average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness

AU - Luciano, Margaret

AU - Mathieu, John E.

AU - Ruddy, Thomas M.

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - External leaders continue to be an important source of influence even when teams are empowered, but it is not always clear how they do so. Extending research on structurally empowered teams, we recognize that teams' external leaders are often responsible for multiple teams. We adopt a multilevel approach to model external leader influences at both the team level and the external leader level of analysis. In doing so, we distinguish the influence of general external leader behaviors (i.e., average external leadership) from those that are directed differently toward the teams that they lead (i.e., relative external leadership). Analysis of data collected from 451 individuals, in 101 teams, reporting to 25 external leaders, revealed that both relative and average external leadership related positively to team empowerment. In turn, team empowerment related positively to team performance and member job satisfaction. However, while the indirect effects were all positive, we found that relative external leadership was not directly related to team performance, and average external leadership evidenced a significant negative direct influence. Additionally, relative external leadership exhibited a significant direct positive influence on member job satisfaction as anticipated, whereas average external leadership did not. These findings attest to the value in distinguishing external leaders' behaviors that are exhibited consistently versus differentially across empowered teams. Implications and future directions for the study and management of external leaders overseeing multiple teams are discussed.

AB - External leaders continue to be an important source of influence even when teams are empowered, but it is not always clear how they do so. Extending research on structurally empowered teams, we recognize that teams' external leaders are often responsible for multiple teams. We adopt a multilevel approach to model external leader influences at both the team level and the external leader level of analysis. In doing so, we distinguish the influence of general external leader behaviors (i.e., average external leadership) from those that are directed differently toward the teams that they lead (i.e., relative external leadership). Analysis of data collected from 451 individuals, in 101 teams, reporting to 25 external leaders, revealed that both relative and average external leadership related positively to team empowerment. In turn, team empowerment related positively to team performance and member job satisfaction. However, while the indirect effects were all positive, we found that relative external leadership was not directly related to team performance, and average external leadership evidenced a significant negative direct influence. Additionally, relative external leadership exhibited a significant direct positive influence on member job satisfaction as anticipated, whereas average external leadership did not. These findings attest to the value in distinguishing external leaders' behaviors that are exhibited consistently versus differentially across empowered teams. Implications and future directions for the study and management of external leaders overseeing multiple teams are discussed.

KW - Empowerment

KW - External leadership

KW - Multilevel

KW - Teams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84897591722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84897591722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0035025

DO - 10.1037/a0035025

M3 - Article

C2 - 24274582

AN - SCOPUS:84897591722

VL - 99

SP - 322

EP - 331

JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

SN - 0021-9010

IS - 2

ER -