Large scale disposal of waste sulfur: From sulfide fuels to sulfate sequestration

T. A. Rappold, Klaus Lackner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Petroleum industries produce more byproduct sulfur than the market can absorb. As a consequence, most sulfur mines around the world have closed down, large stocks of yellow sulfur have piled up near remote operations, and growing amounts of toxic H2S are disposed of in the subsurface. Unless sulfur demand drastically increases or thorough disposal practices are developed, byproduct sulfur will persist as a chemical waste problem on the scale of 107 tons per year. We review industrial practices, salient sulfur chemistry, and the geochemical cycle to develop sulfur management concepts at the appropriate scale. We contend that the environmentally responsible disposal of sulfur would involve conversion to sulfuric acid followed by chemical neutralization with equivalent amounts of base, which common alkaline rocks can supply cheaply. The resulting sulfate salts are benign and suitable for brine injection underground or release to the ocean, where they would cause minimal disturbance to ecosystems. Sequestration costs can be recouped by taking advantage of the fuel-grade thermal energy released in the process of oxidizing reduced compounds and sequestering the products. Sulfate sequestration can eliminate stockpiles and avert the proliferation of enriched H2S stores underground while providing plenty of carbon-free energy to hydrocarbon processing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1368-1380
Number of pages13
JournalEnergy
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Waste disposal
Sulfur
Byproducts
Chemical wastes
Sulfates
Sulfides
Petroleum industry
Thermal energy
Sulfuric acid
Ecosystems
Free energy
Hydrocarbons
Rocks
Salts
Carbon
Processing
Costs

Keywords

  • Acid gas
  • Alkaline minerals
  • Alternative fuels
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Fossil fuels
  • HS
  • Heavy oil
  • Hydrogen sulfide
  • Olivine
  • Ophiolites
  • Sour gas
  • Sulfur glut
  • Sulfur management
  • Sulfur sequestration
  • Tar sands

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Energy(all)
  • Pollution

Cite this

Large scale disposal of waste sulfur : From sulfide fuels to sulfate sequestration. / Rappold, T. A.; Lackner, Klaus.

In: Energy, Vol. 35, No. 3, 03.2010, p. 1368-1380.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7f3e50ba5d8487687a2cd118f4e1cbc,
title = "Large scale disposal of waste sulfur: From sulfide fuels to sulfate sequestration",
abstract = "Petroleum industries produce more byproduct sulfur than the market can absorb. As a consequence, most sulfur mines around the world have closed down, large stocks of yellow sulfur have piled up near remote operations, and growing amounts of toxic H2S are disposed of in the subsurface. Unless sulfur demand drastically increases or thorough disposal practices are developed, byproduct sulfur will persist as a chemical waste problem on the scale of 107 tons per year. We review industrial practices, salient sulfur chemistry, and the geochemical cycle to develop sulfur management concepts at the appropriate scale. We contend that the environmentally responsible disposal of sulfur would involve conversion to sulfuric acid followed by chemical neutralization with equivalent amounts of base, which common alkaline rocks can supply cheaply. The resulting sulfate salts are benign and suitable for brine injection underground or release to the ocean, where they would cause minimal disturbance to ecosystems. Sequestration costs can be recouped by taking advantage of the fuel-grade thermal energy released in the process of oxidizing reduced compounds and sequestering the products. Sulfate sequestration can eliminate stockpiles and avert the proliferation of enriched H2S stores underground while providing plenty of carbon-free energy to hydrocarbon processing.",
keywords = "Acid gas, Alkaline minerals, Alternative fuels, Carbon sequestration, Fossil fuels, HS, Heavy oil, Hydrogen sulfide, Olivine, Ophiolites, Sour gas, Sulfur glut, Sulfur management, Sulfur sequestration, Tar sands",
author = "Rappold, {T. A.} and Klaus Lackner",
year = "2010",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.022",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1368--1380",
journal = "Energy",
issn = "0360-5442",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Large scale disposal of waste sulfur

T2 - From sulfide fuels to sulfate sequestration

AU - Rappold, T. A.

AU - Lackner, Klaus

PY - 2010/3

Y1 - 2010/3

N2 - Petroleum industries produce more byproduct sulfur than the market can absorb. As a consequence, most sulfur mines around the world have closed down, large stocks of yellow sulfur have piled up near remote operations, and growing amounts of toxic H2S are disposed of in the subsurface. Unless sulfur demand drastically increases or thorough disposal practices are developed, byproduct sulfur will persist as a chemical waste problem on the scale of 107 tons per year. We review industrial practices, salient sulfur chemistry, and the geochemical cycle to develop sulfur management concepts at the appropriate scale. We contend that the environmentally responsible disposal of sulfur would involve conversion to sulfuric acid followed by chemical neutralization with equivalent amounts of base, which common alkaline rocks can supply cheaply. The resulting sulfate salts are benign and suitable for brine injection underground or release to the ocean, where they would cause minimal disturbance to ecosystems. Sequestration costs can be recouped by taking advantage of the fuel-grade thermal energy released in the process of oxidizing reduced compounds and sequestering the products. Sulfate sequestration can eliminate stockpiles and avert the proliferation of enriched H2S stores underground while providing plenty of carbon-free energy to hydrocarbon processing.

AB - Petroleum industries produce more byproduct sulfur than the market can absorb. As a consequence, most sulfur mines around the world have closed down, large stocks of yellow sulfur have piled up near remote operations, and growing amounts of toxic H2S are disposed of in the subsurface. Unless sulfur demand drastically increases or thorough disposal practices are developed, byproduct sulfur will persist as a chemical waste problem on the scale of 107 tons per year. We review industrial practices, salient sulfur chemistry, and the geochemical cycle to develop sulfur management concepts at the appropriate scale. We contend that the environmentally responsible disposal of sulfur would involve conversion to sulfuric acid followed by chemical neutralization with equivalent amounts of base, which common alkaline rocks can supply cheaply. The resulting sulfate salts are benign and suitable for brine injection underground or release to the ocean, where they would cause minimal disturbance to ecosystems. Sequestration costs can be recouped by taking advantage of the fuel-grade thermal energy released in the process of oxidizing reduced compounds and sequestering the products. Sulfate sequestration can eliminate stockpiles and avert the proliferation of enriched H2S stores underground while providing plenty of carbon-free energy to hydrocarbon processing.

KW - Acid gas

KW - Alkaline minerals

KW - Alternative fuels

KW - Carbon sequestration

KW - Fossil fuels

KW - HS

KW - Heavy oil

KW - Hydrogen sulfide

KW - Olivine

KW - Ophiolites

KW - Sour gas

KW - Sulfur glut

KW - Sulfur management

KW - Sulfur sequestration

KW - Tar sands

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76049086572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=76049086572&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.022

DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2009.11.022

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:76049086572

VL - 35

SP - 1368

EP - 1380

JO - Energy

JF - Energy

SN - 0360-5442

IS - 3

ER -