TY - JOUR
T1 - Language, Class, and Identity
T2 - Teenagers Fashioning Themselves Through Language
AU - Gee, James Paul
AU - Allen, Anna Ruth
AU - Clinton, Katherine
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - This article uses discourse analysis to study how teenagers from different social classes in the United States use language to fashion themselves as different "kinds of people." Our analyses lead us to the following conclusions: The working class teens (in these interviews) use language to fashion their identities in a way that is closely attached to a world of social and dialogic interaction. The upper middle class teens (in these interviews) use language to construct their identities in a way that detaches itself from "everyday" social interaction and orients more towards their personal biographical trajectories through an "achievement space" defined by the (deeply aligned) norms of their families, schools, and powerful institutions in our society. In addition, the upper middle class teens use the abstract language of rational argumentation to "cloak" (of "defer") their quite personal interests and fears, while the working class teens use a personalized narrative (i.e., story-based) language to encode their values, interests, and themes.
AB - This article uses discourse analysis to study how teenagers from different social classes in the United States use language to fashion themselves as different "kinds of people." Our analyses lead us to the following conclusions: The working class teens (in these interviews) use language to fashion their identities in a way that is closely attached to a world of social and dialogic interaction. The upper middle class teens (in these interviews) use language to construct their identities in a way that detaches itself from "everyday" social interaction and orients more towards their personal biographical trajectories through an "achievement space" defined by the (deeply aligned) norms of their families, schools, and powerful institutions in our society. In addition, the upper middle class teens use the abstract language of rational argumentation to "cloak" (of "defer") their quite personal interests and fears, while the working class teens use a personalized narrative (i.e., story-based) language to encode their values, interests, and themes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0345876785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0345876785&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00045-0
DO - 10.1016/S0898-5898(00)00045-0
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0345876785
SN - 0898-5898
VL - 12
SP - 175
EP - 194
JO - Linguistics and Education
JF - Linguistics and Education
IS - 2
ER -