Land use and land cover mapping from diverse data sources for an arid urban environments

Elizabeth Wentz, William L. Stefanov, Corinna Gries, Diane Hope

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate and up-to-date data describing land use and land cover change support studies of urban growth such as quantifying the amount of rural to urban change and identifying change trajectories. This paper compares three methods for identifying urban land use/land cover, based on aerial photography, satellite imagery, and ground observations. While it might be natural to assume that classification based on ground observations would be the most accurate, this may not always be the case. Here we aim to quantify to what degree these three different classification approaches agree or contradict each other and to understand why. Land use/land cover data derived from these three sources were compared for the Phoenix metropolitan area, an arid urban region undergoing rapid urbanization. Our results show that satellite data are well suited to classify land use/land cover where land use categories are associated with homogeneous land cover at the subpixel level, but that for land use categories with subpixel land cover complexity, aerial photographs or ground observations are needed to aid in the classification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)320-346
Number of pages27
JournalComputers, Environment and Urban Systems
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

land cover
land use
urban region
aerial photography
urban growth
photography
arid region
aerial photograph
satellite imagery
metropolitan area
urbanization
satellite data
agglomeration area
trajectory

Keywords

  • Aerial photography
  • Ground observations
  • Landsat thematic mapper
  • Phoenix AZ
  • Urban land cover
  • Urban land use

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecological Modeling
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Land use and land cover mapping from diverse data sources for an arid urban environments. / Wentz, Elizabeth; Stefanov, William L.; Gries, Corinna; Hope, Diane.

In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 30, No. 3, 05.2006, p. 320-346.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wentz, Elizabeth ; Stefanov, William L. ; Gries, Corinna ; Hope, Diane. / Land use and land cover mapping from diverse data sources for an arid urban environments. In: Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 320-346.
@article{b1a8d40c0fb54f86807c95e8c2b71bd7,
title = "Land use and land cover mapping from diverse data sources for an arid urban environments",
abstract = "Accurate and up-to-date data describing land use and land cover change support studies of urban growth such as quantifying the amount of rural to urban change and identifying change trajectories. This paper compares three methods for identifying urban land use/land cover, based on aerial photography, satellite imagery, and ground observations. While it might be natural to assume that classification based on ground observations would be the most accurate, this may not always be the case. Here we aim to quantify to what degree these three different classification approaches agree or contradict each other and to understand why. Land use/land cover data derived from these three sources were compared for the Phoenix metropolitan area, an arid urban region undergoing rapid urbanization. Our results show that satellite data are well suited to classify land use/land cover where land use categories are associated with homogeneous land cover at the subpixel level, but that for land use categories with subpixel land cover complexity, aerial photographs or ground observations are needed to aid in the classification.",
keywords = "Aerial photography, Ground observations, Landsat thematic mapper, Phoenix AZ, Urban land cover, Urban land use",
author = "Elizabeth Wentz and Stefanov, {William L.} and Corinna Gries and Diane Hope",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.07.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "320--346",
journal = "Computers, Environment and Urban Systems",
issn = "0198-9715",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Land use and land cover mapping from diverse data sources for an arid urban environments

AU - Wentz, Elizabeth

AU - Stefanov, William L.

AU - Gries, Corinna

AU - Hope, Diane

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Accurate and up-to-date data describing land use and land cover change support studies of urban growth such as quantifying the amount of rural to urban change and identifying change trajectories. This paper compares three methods for identifying urban land use/land cover, based on aerial photography, satellite imagery, and ground observations. While it might be natural to assume that classification based on ground observations would be the most accurate, this may not always be the case. Here we aim to quantify to what degree these three different classification approaches agree or contradict each other and to understand why. Land use/land cover data derived from these three sources were compared for the Phoenix metropolitan area, an arid urban region undergoing rapid urbanization. Our results show that satellite data are well suited to classify land use/land cover where land use categories are associated with homogeneous land cover at the subpixel level, but that for land use categories with subpixel land cover complexity, aerial photographs or ground observations are needed to aid in the classification.

AB - Accurate and up-to-date data describing land use and land cover change support studies of urban growth such as quantifying the amount of rural to urban change and identifying change trajectories. This paper compares three methods for identifying urban land use/land cover, based on aerial photography, satellite imagery, and ground observations. While it might be natural to assume that classification based on ground observations would be the most accurate, this may not always be the case. Here we aim to quantify to what degree these three different classification approaches agree or contradict each other and to understand why. Land use/land cover data derived from these three sources were compared for the Phoenix metropolitan area, an arid urban region undergoing rapid urbanization. Our results show that satellite data are well suited to classify land use/land cover where land use categories are associated with homogeneous land cover at the subpixel level, but that for land use categories with subpixel land cover complexity, aerial photographs or ground observations are needed to aid in the classification.

KW - Aerial photography

KW - Ground observations

KW - Landsat thematic mapper

KW - Phoenix AZ

KW - Urban land cover

KW - Urban land use

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33747873164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33747873164&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.07.002

DO - 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.07.002

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 320

EP - 346

JO - Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

JF - Computers, Environment and Urban Systems

SN - 0198-9715

IS - 3

ER -