Lack Of A Threshold Of Genetic Resistance To Marek’S Disease And The Incidence Of Humoral Antibody

J. M. Sharma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On challenge exposure of genetically susceptible (Line 7) and genetically resistant (Line 6) chickens to graded doses of Marek’s disease virus, Line 6 chickens were at least 106-fold more resistant to clinical Marek’s disease than Line 7 chickens. Hence, if there was a “threshold” of resistance of Line 6 chickens to the disease, it was not overcome by 106times the dose of Marek’s disease virus required to induce neoplastic response in Line 7. Approximately similar doses of virus were required to induce a precipitating and virus neutralizing antibody response in Lines 6 and 7, indicating that both types of chickens were equally susceptible to infection with Marek’s disease virus. As opposed to the marked resistance of maternal antibody positive Line 6 chickens used above, iffaternal-antibody-negative chickens of this line were highly susceptible to clinical Marek’s disease. Since the genetic homogeneity of maternal antibody positive and maternal antibody negative populations of Line 6 chickens was equivocal, the difference of Marek’s disease susceptibility between the two populations could not with certainty be attributed to maternal antibody alone. Line 7 chickens that survived an infection with Marek’s disease virus produced virus neutralizing antibody as did genetically resistant Line 6 chickens. In many susceptible chickens, the virus neutralizing antibody and nerve lesions coexisted. Agar gel pre-cipitin, immunofluorescent, and virus neutralizing antibody tests on 50 sera from birds inoculated with Marek’s disease virus indicated that virus neutralizing and immunofluorescent tests.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-90
Number of pages16
JournalAvian Pathology
Volume2
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 1973
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Marek Disease
Marek disease
genetic resistance
Chickens
chickens
Viruses
incidence
antibodies
Antibodies
Mardivirus
Incidence
maternal immunity
Neutralizing Antibodies
neutralizing antibodies
viruses
Mothers
dosage
biological resistance
Disease Susceptibility
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Food Animals

Cite this

Lack Of A Threshold Of Genetic Resistance To Marek’S Disease And The Incidence Of Humoral Antibody. / Sharma, J. M.

In: Avian Pathology, Vol. 2, No. 2, 01.04.1973, p. 75-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{465bdcd946084a5ba2602d24e5f37f0d,
title = "Lack Of A Threshold Of Genetic Resistance To Marek’S Disease And The Incidence Of Humoral Antibody",
abstract = "On challenge exposure of genetically susceptible (Line 7) and genetically resistant (Line 6) chickens to graded doses of Marek’s disease virus, Line 6 chickens were at least 106-fold more resistant to clinical Marek’s disease than Line 7 chickens. Hence, if there was a “threshold” of resistance of Line 6 chickens to the disease, it was not overcome by 106times the dose of Marek’s disease virus required to induce neoplastic response in Line 7. Approximately similar doses of virus were required to induce a precipitating and virus neutralizing antibody response in Lines 6 and 7, indicating that both types of chickens were equally susceptible to infection with Marek’s disease virus. As opposed to the marked resistance of maternal antibody positive Line 6 chickens used above, iffaternal-antibody-negative chickens of this line were highly susceptible to clinical Marek’s disease. Since the genetic homogeneity of maternal antibody positive and maternal antibody negative populations of Line 6 chickens was equivocal, the difference of Marek’s disease susceptibility between the two populations could not with certainty be attributed to maternal antibody alone. Line 7 chickens that survived an infection with Marek’s disease virus produced virus neutralizing antibody as did genetically resistant Line 6 chickens. In many susceptible chickens, the virus neutralizing antibody and nerve lesions coexisted. Agar gel pre-cipitin, immunofluorescent, and virus neutralizing antibody tests on 50 sera from birds inoculated with Marek’s disease virus indicated that virus neutralizing and immunofluorescent tests.",
author = "Sharma, {J. M.}",
year = "1973",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03079457309353786",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "75--90",
journal = "Avian Pathology",
issn = "0307-9457",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lack Of A Threshold Of Genetic Resistance To Marek’S Disease And The Incidence Of Humoral Antibody

AU - Sharma, J. M.

PY - 1973/4/1

Y1 - 1973/4/1

N2 - On challenge exposure of genetically susceptible (Line 7) and genetically resistant (Line 6) chickens to graded doses of Marek’s disease virus, Line 6 chickens were at least 106-fold more resistant to clinical Marek’s disease than Line 7 chickens. Hence, if there was a “threshold” of resistance of Line 6 chickens to the disease, it was not overcome by 106times the dose of Marek’s disease virus required to induce neoplastic response in Line 7. Approximately similar doses of virus were required to induce a precipitating and virus neutralizing antibody response in Lines 6 and 7, indicating that both types of chickens were equally susceptible to infection with Marek’s disease virus. As opposed to the marked resistance of maternal antibody positive Line 6 chickens used above, iffaternal-antibody-negative chickens of this line were highly susceptible to clinical Marek’s disease. Since the genetic homogeneity of maternal antibody positive and maternal antibody negative populations of Line 6 chickens was equivocal, the difference of Marek’s disease susceptibility between the two populations could not with certainty be attributed to maternal antibody alone. Line 7 chickens that survived an infection with Marek’s disease virus produced virus neutralizing antibody as did genetically resistant Line 6 chickens. In many susceptible chickens, the virus neutralizing antibody and nerve lesions coexisted. Agar gel pre-cipitin, immunofluorescent, and virus neutralizing antibody tests on 50 sera from birds inoculated with Marek’s disease virus indicated that virus neutralizing and immunofluorescent tests.

AB - On challenge exposure of genetically susceptible (Line 7) and genetically resistant (Line 6) chickens to graded doses of Marek’s disease virus, Line 6 chickens were at least 106-fold more resistant to clinical Marek’s disease than Line 7 chickens. Hence, if there was a “threshold” of resistance of Line 6 chickens to the disease, it was not overcome by 106times the dose of Marek’s disease virus required to induce neoplastic response in Line 7. Approximately similar doses of virus were required to induce a precipitating and virus neutralizing antibody response in Lines 6 and 7, indicating that both types of chickens were equally susceptible to infection with Marek’s disease virus. As opposed to the marked resistance of maternal antibody positive Line 6 chickens used above, iffaternal-antibody-negative chickens of this line were highly susceptible to clinical Marek’s disease. Since the genetic homogeneity of maternal antibody positive and maternal antibody negative populations of Line 6 chickens was equivocal, the difference of Marek’s disease susceptibility between the two populations could not with certainty be attributed to maternal antibody alone. Line 7 chickens that survived an infection with Marek’s disease virus produced virus neutralizing antibody as did genetically resistant Line 6 chickens. In many susceptible chickens, the virus neutralizing antibody and nerve lesions coexisted. Agar gel pre-cipitin, immunofluorescent, and virus neutralizing antibody tests on 50 sera from birds inoculated with Marek’s disease virus indicated that virus neutralizing and immunofluorescent tests.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84946622276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84946622276&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03079457309353786

DO - 10.1080/03079457309353786

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 75

EP - 90

JO - Avian Pathology

JF - Avian Pathology

SN - 0307-9457

IS - 2

ER -