Laboratory experiments in public policy and management

Barry Bozeman, Patrick Scott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

50 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews and evaluates the potential of laboratory experiments in public policy and management (PPM) research. We first consider reasons why laboratory experiments tend to be neglected in PPM research. These include the willingness of researchers to trade away rigor and internal validity to achieve local generalizability, the naturalistic preference for field and/or quasi-experiments, and the tendency to focus upon groups, organizations, and policies-rather than individuals-as units of analysis. Next, we provide an overview of the relatively few PPM studies which have employed laboratory experiments. We then focus on some of the methodological controversies surrounding the use of laboratory experiments and consider their implications for PPM research. We conclude with some suggestions for enhancing the potential for utilizing laboratory experiments as a method of choice for PPM researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)293-313
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume2
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jul 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Public Policy
public management
laboratory experiment
research management
public policy
Experiment
Experiments
Research
Research Personnel
Focus Groups
suggestion
Laboratory experiments
Public policy
Public management
Organizations
tendencies
Tend
Internal
experiment
Unit

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Computational Mathematics
  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Marketing
  • Public Administration
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Laboratory experiments in public policy and management. / Bozeman, Barry; Scott, Patrick.

In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 2, No. 3, 07.1992, p. 293-313.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{246936f1b9ca4320aef2c33d2e22af13,
title = "Laboratory experiments in public policy and management",
abstract = "This article reviews and evaluates the potential of laboratory experiments in public policy and management (PPM) research. We first consider reasons why laboratory experiments tend to be neglected in PPM research. These include the willingness of researchers to trade away rigor and internal validity to achieve local generalizability, the naturalistic preference for field and/or quasi-experiments, and the tendency to focus upon groups, organizations, and policies-rather than individuals-as units of analysis. Next, we provide an overview of the relatively few PPM studies which have employed laboratory experiments. We then focus on some of the methodological controversies surrounding the use of laboratory experiments and consider their implications for PPM research. We conclude with some suggestions for enhancing the potential for utilizing laboratory experiments as a method of choice for PPM researchers.",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Patrick Scott",
year = "1992",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "293--313",
journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
issn = "1053-1858",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laboratory experiments in public policy and management

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Scott, Patrick

PY - 1992/7

Y1 - 1992/7

N2 - This article reviews and evaluates the potential of laboratory experiments in public policy and management (PPM) research. We first consider reasons why laboratory experiments tend to be neglected in PPM research. These include the willingness of researchers to trade away rigor and internal validity to achieve local generalizability, the naturalistic preference for field and/or quasi-experiments, and the tendency to focus upon groups, organizations, and policies-rather than individuals-as units of analysis. Next, we provide an overview of the relatively few PPM studies which have employed laboratory experiments. We then focus on some of the methodological controversies surrounding the use of laboratory experiments and consider their implications for PPM research. We conclude with some suggestions for enhancing the potential for utilizing laboratory experiments as a method of choice for PPM researchers.

AB - This article reviews and evaluates the potential of laboratory experiments in public policy and management (PPM) research. We first consider reasons why laboratory experiments tend to be neglected in PPM research. These include the willingness of researchers to trade away rigor and internal validity to achieve local generalizability, the naturalistic preference for field and/or quasi-experiments, and the tendency to focus upon groups, organizations, and policies-rather than individuals-as units of analysis. Next, we provide an overview of the relatively few PPM studies which have employed laboratory experiments. We then focus on some of the methodological controversies surrounding the use of laboratory experiments and consider their implications for PPM research. We conclude with some suggestions for enhancing the potential for utilizing laboratory experiments as a method of choice for PPM researchers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346641824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0346641824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 2

SP - 293

EP - 313

JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

SN - 1053-1858

IS - 3

ER -