"Knowledge value alliances": An alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation

Juan D. Rogers, Barry Bozeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The question of what the relevant entities or units of analysis for studying the dynamics of R&Dare is central not only for adequate characterizations of the system of scientific and technological knowledge production but also for determining the correct focus for evaluation of R&D activities. Typically, R&D performance evaluations have focused not only on the wrong thing but have looked in the wrong place. Most evaluations have been project or program based. Often this focus is misleading. This article presents a "knowledge value" framework as an alternative focus for understanding and evaluating scientific and technical work. This framework consists of two core concepts: the Knowledge Value Collective (KVC) and the Knowledge Value Alliance (KVA). On the basis of the analysis oftwenty-eight case studies of research activities, the authors present a typology of KVAs and conclude that they area better object of evaluation than discipline-based projects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-54
Number of pages32
JournalScience Technology and Human Values
Volume26
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

evaluation
Values
knowledge production
typology
Alliances
Evaluation
performance
Performance evaluation
Scientific knowledge
Knowledge production
Research activities
Technological knowledge
Unit of analysis
Knowledge Production
Entity
Performance Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cite this

"Knowledge value alliances" : An alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation. / Rogers, Juan D.; Bozeman, Barry.

In: Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 26, No. 1, 12.2001, p. 23-54.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{054ab717d7d04eedbf06aa74c706f7bd,
title = "{"}Knowledge value alliances{"}: An alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation",
abstract = "The question of what the relevant entities or units of analysis for studying the dynamics of R&Dare is central not only for adequate characterizations of the system of scientific and technological knowledge production but also for determining the correct focus for evaluation of R&D activities. Typically, R&D performance evaluations have focused not only on the wrong thing but have looked in the wrong place. Most evaluations have been project or program based. Often this focus is misleading. This article presents a {"}knowledge value{"} framework as an alternative focus for understanding and evaluating scientific and technical work. This framework consists of two core concepts: the Knowledge Value Collective (KVC) and the Knowledge Value Alliance (KVA). On the basis of the analysis oftwenty-eight case studies of research activities, the authors present a typology of KVAs and conclude that they area better object of evaluation than discipline-based projects.",
author = "Rogers, {Juan D.} and Barry Bozeman",
year = "2001",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "23--54",
journal = "Science Technology and Human Values",
issn = "0162-2439",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - "Knowledge value alliances"

T2 - An alternative to the R&D project focus in evaluation

AU - Rogers, Juan D.

AU - Bozeman, Barry

PY - 2001/12

Y1 - 2001/12

N2 - The question of what the relevant entities or units of analysis for studying the dynamics of R&Dare is central not only for adequate characterizations of the system of scientific and technological knowledge production but also for determining the correct focus for evaluation of R&D activities. Typically, R&D performance evaluations have focused not only on the wrong thing but have looked in the wrong place. Most evaluations have been project or program based. Often this focus is misleading. This article presents a "knowledge value" framework as an alternative focus for understanding and evaluating scientific and technical work. This framework consists of two core concepts: the Knowledge Value Collective (KVC) and the Knowledge Value Alliance (KVA). On the basis of the analysis oftwenty-eight case studies of research activities, the authors present a typology of KVAs and conclude that they area better object of evaluation than discipline-based projects.

AB - The question of what the relevant entities or units of analysis for studying the dynamics of R&Dare is central not only for adequate characterizations of the system of scientific and technological knowledge production but also for determining the correct focus for evaluation of R&D activities. Typically, R&D performance evaluations have focused not only on the wrong thing but have looked in the wrong place. Most evaluations have been project or program based. Often this focus is misleading. This article presents a "knowledge value" framework as an alternative focus for understanding and evaluating scientific and technical work. This framework consists of two core concepts: the Knowledge Value Collective (KVC) and the Knowledge Value Alliance (KVA). On the basis of the analysis oftwenty-eight case studies of research activities, the authors present a typology of KVAs and conclude that they area better object of evaluation than discipline-based projects.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035529068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035529068&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035529068

VL - 26

SP - 23

EP - 54

JO - Science Technology and Human Values

JF - Science Technology and Human Values

SN - 0162-2439

IS - 1

ER -