Knowledge of Revision and Revising Behavior among Students with Learning Disabilities

Charles A. Macarthur, Stephen Graham, Shirley Schwartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

56 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study investigated learning disabled students' knowledge of revision, their revising behavior, and the quality of their revisions. Students' predominant conception of revision, as revealed in interviews, was correction of errors. However, when presented with a specific text, most students were able to make some substantive suggestions for revision - primarily addition of information. Actual revisions of stories and opinion essays consisted mainly of mechanical changes or minor word changes that had no effect on meaning. In terms of quality, fewer than half of all revisions were rated as improvements. Furthermore, no overall change in length, quality, or mechanical errors was found between first and second drafts. The only type of revision that positively affected overall quality was addition of T-units. Implications for revision instruction are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-73
Number of pages13
JournalLearning Disability Quarterly
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 16 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning Disorders
learning disability
Students
student
Learning
Interviews
instruction
interview
learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Knowledge of Revision and Revising Behavior among Students with Learning Disabilities. / Macarthur, Charles A.; Graham, Stephen; Schwartz, Shirley.

In: Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 1, 16.02.1991, p. 61-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bc6b68482f1f41c78a5f366a36c0b402,
title = "Knowledge of Revision and Revising Behavior among Students with Learning Disabilities",
abstract = "The study investigated learning disabled students' knowledge of revision, their revising behavior, and the quality of their revisions. Students' predominant conception of revision, as revealed in interviews, was correction of errors. However, when presented with a specific text, most students were able to make some substantive suggestions for revision - primarily addition of information. Actual revisions of stories and opinion essays consisted mainly of mechanical changes or minor word changes that had no effect on meaning. In terms of quality, fewer than half of all revisions were rated as improvements. Furthermore, no overall change in length, quality, or mechanical errors was found between first and second drafts. The only type of revision that positively affected overall quality was addition of T-units. Implications for revision instruction are discussed.",
author = "Macarthur, {Charles A.} and Stephen Graham and Shirley Schwartz",
year = "1991",
month = "2",
day = "16",
doi = "10.2307/1510373",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "61--73",
journal = "Learning Disability Quarterly",
issn = "0731-9487",
publisher = "Council for Learning Disabilities",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge of Revision and Revising Behavior among Students with Learning Disabilities

AU - Macarthur, Charles A.

AU - Graham, Stephen

AU - Schwartz, Shirley

PY - 1991/2/16

Y1 - 1991/2/16

N2 - The study investigated learning disabled students' knowledge of revision, their revising behavior, and the quality of their revisions. Students' predominant conception of revision, as revealed in interviews, was correction of errors. However, when presented with a specific text, most students were able to make some substantive suggestions for revision - primarily addition of information. Actual revisions of stories and opinion essays consisted mainly of mechanical changes or minor word changes that had no effect on meaning. In terms of quality, fewer than half of all revisions were rated as improvements. Furthermore, no overall change in length, quality, or mechanical errors was found between first and second drafts. The only type of revision that positively affected overall quality was addition of T-units. Implications for revision instruction are discussed.

AB - The study investigated learning disabled students' knowledge of revision, their revising behavior, and the quality of their revisions. Students' predominant conception of revision, as revealed in interviews, was correction of errors. However, when presented with a specific text, most students were able to make some substantive suggestions for revision - primarily addition of information. Actual revisions of stories and opinion essays consisted mainly of mechanical changes or minor word changes that had no effect on meaning. In terms of quality, fewer than half of all revisions were rated as improvements. Furthermore, no overall change in length, quality, or mechanical errors was found between first and second drafts. The only type of revision that positively affected overall quality was addition of T-units. Implications for revision instruction are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009248260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009248260&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/1510373

DO - 10.2307/1510373

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0009248260

VL - 14

SP - 61

EP - 73

JO - Learning Disability Quarterly

JF - Learning Disability Quarterly

SN - 0731-9487

IS - 1

ER -