Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum.

Vimla Patel, Jose F. Arocha, Sumedha Chaudhari, Daniel R. Karlin, Dalius J. Briedis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of curricular change on knowledge integration and reasoning processes during problem-solving by medical students. The curricular change involved the introduction of problem-based, small group tutorials into a conventional health science curriculum (CC). Students at three levels of training were asked to provide diagnostic explanations of two clinical cases, both before (spontaneous) and after (primed) being exposed to basic science information relevant to the clinical problems. Data were analyzed using techniques of propositional and semantic analysis. Based on theories of instruction and cognition, we expected that the instructional changes would facilitate knowledge integration and influence the reasoning patterns of the students. The results show that students generated fewer inferences and used more information from the basic science text (text-based) to explain the clinical problems. However, they generated a greater number of elaborations during explanations using a mixture of data-driven and hypothesis-driven strategies. The spontaneous and primed problem-solving conditions produced more hypothesis-driven and data-driven strategies, respectively, as would be expected in a hybrid curriculum. We conclude that a) problem-based, small group tutorials facilitate integration of clinical and biomedical knowledge through the use of elaborations and hypothesis-driven strategies, and b) aspects of problem-based learning can be successfully integrated into traditional curricula.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1186-1211
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Dental Education
Volume69
Issue number11
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Information Science
Curriculum
Students
instruction
curriculum
knowledge
Problem-Based Learning
small group
Medical Students
Semantics
Cognition
student
health science
information science
Health
medical student
cognition
diagnostic
semantics
science

Cite this

Patel, V., Arocha, J. F., Chaudhari, S., Karlin, D. R., & Briedis, D. J. (2005). Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum. Journal of Dental Education, 69(11), 1186-1211.

Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum. / Patel, Vimla; Arocha, Jose F.; Chaudhari, Sumedha; Karlin, Daniel R.; Briedis, Dalius J.

In: Journal of Dental Education, Vol. 69, No. 11, 01.01.2005, p. 1186-1211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Patel, V, Arocha, JF, Chaudhari, S, Karlin, DR & Briedis, DJ 2005, 'Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum.', Journal of Dental Education, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 1186-1211.
Patel V, Arocha JF, Chaudhari S, Karlin DR, Briedis DJ. Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum. Journal of Dental Education. 2005 Jan 1;69(11):1186-1211.
Patel, Vimla ; Arocha, Jose F. ; Chaudhari, Sumedha ; Karlin, Daniel R. ; Briedis, Dalius J. / Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum. In: Journal of Dental Education. 2005 ; Vol. 69, No. 11. pp. 1186-1211.
@article{df2f141b42ea416bb09a5ce261cbcb4f,
title = "Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum.",
abstract = "This study investigates the effect of curricular change on knowledge integration and reasoning processes during problem-solving by medical students. The curricular change involved the introduction of problem-based, small group tutorials into a conventional health science curriculum (CC). Students at three levels of training were asked to provide diagnostic explanations of two clinical cases, both before (spontaneous) and after (primed) being exposed to basic science information relevant to the clinical problems. Data were analyzed using techniques of propositional and semantic analysis. Based on theories of instruction and cognition, we expected that the instructional changes would facilitate knowledge integration and influence the reasoning patterns of the students. The results show that students generated fewer inferences and used more information from the basic science text (text-based) to explain the clinical problems. However, they generated a greater number of elaborations during explanations using a mixture of data-driven and hypothesis-driven strategies. The spontaneous and primed problem-solving conditions produced more hypothesis-driven and data-driven strategies, respectively, as would be expected in a hybrid curriculum. We conclude that a) problem-based, small group tutorials facilitate integration of clinical and biomedical knowledge through the use of elaborations and hypothesis-driven strategies, and b) aspects of problem-based learning can be successfully integrated into traditional curricula.",
author = "Vimla Patel and Arocha, {Jose F.} and Sumedha Chaudhari and Karlin, {Daniel R.} and Briedis, {Dalius J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "1186--1211",
journal = "Journal of Dental Education",
issn = "0022-0337",
publisher = "American Dental Education Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge integration and reasoning as a function of instruction in a hybrid medical curriculum.

AU - Patel, Vimla

AU - Arocha, Jose F.

AU - Chaudhari, Sumedha

AU - Karlin, Daniel R.

AU - Briedis, Dalius J.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - This study investigates the effect of curricular change on knowledge integration and reasoning processes during problem-solving by medical students. The curricular change involved the introduction of problem-based, small group tutorials into a conventional health science curriculum (CC). Students at three levels of training were asked to provide diagnostic explanations of two clinical cases, both before (spontaneous) and after (primed) being exposed to basic science information relevant to the clinical problems. Data were analyzed using techniques of propositional and semantic analysis. Based on theories of instruction and cognition, we expected that the instructional changes would facilitate knowledge integration and influence the reasoning patterns of the students. The results show that students generated fewer inferences and used more information from the basic science text (text-based) to explain the clinical problems. However, they generated a greater number of elaborations during explanations using a mixture of data-driven and hypothesis-driven strategies. The spontaneous and primed problem-solving conditions produced more hypothesis-driven and data-driven strategies, respectively, as would be expected in a hybrid curriculum. We conclude that a) problem-based, small group tutorials facilitate integration of clinical and biomedical knowledge through the use of elaborations and hypothesis-driven strategies, and b) aspects of problem-based learning can be successfully integrated into traditional curricula.

AB - This study investigates the effect of curricular change on knowledge integration and reasoning processes during problem-solving by medical students. The curricular change involved the introduction of problem-based, small group tutorials into a conventional health science curriculum (CC). Students at three levels of training were asked to provide diagnostic explanations of two clinical cases, both before (spontaneous) and after (primed) being exposed to basic science information relevant to the clinical problems. Data were analyzed using techniques of propositional and semantic analysis. Based on theories of instruction and cognition, we expected that the instructional changes would facilitate knowledge integration and influence the reasoning patterns of the students. The results show that students generated fewer inferences and used more information from the basic science text (text-based) to explain the clinical problems. However, they generated a greater number of elaborations during explanations using a mixture of data-driven and hypothesis-driven strategies. The spontaneous and primed problem-solving conditions produced more hypothesis-driven and data-driven strategies, respectively, as would be expected in a hybrid curriculum. We conclude that a) problem-based, small group tutorials facilitate integration of clinical and biomedical knowledge through the use of elaborations and hypothesis-driven strategies, and b) aspects of problem-based learning can be successfully integrated into traditional curricula.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31344436518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31344436518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16275683

AN - SCOPUS:31344436518

VL - 69

SP - 1186

EP - 1211

JO - Journal of Dental Education

JF - Journal of Dental Education

SN - 0022-0337

IS - 11

ER -