Knowledge in action: Negotiating power in development

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

How can sociopolitical theories inform participatory action research and what are the implications for development? I answer this question by reflecting on a research, training, and networking project that I conducted with small-scale rooibos tea farmers in postapartheid South Africa. My research team was comprised of community-based farmer leaders who sought representation in an industry marked by acute inequalities. Guided by Freire’s theory of conscientization, we employed a multi-paradigmatic framework to address questions pertaining to governance and identity. Theoretical training enabled my team to systematically interrogate differential power dynamics, illuminating the sociopolitical terrain. In return my co-investigators taught me to embrace a more situated understanding of power, helping us to shift the relations of research and practice. Yet we were unable to scale up outcomes due to material barriers, suggesting that knowledge alone is not power. Our experience illustrates the limitations of conscientization as a model for participatory development as well as its potential for delivering a multi-paradigmatic theory of social transformation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAction Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

farmer
action research
networking
leader
governance
industry
community
Negotiating
experience
Farmers
Participatory development
South Africa
Community-based
Governance
Tea
Networking
Participatory action research
Industry

Keywords

  • conscientization
  • democratization
  • Development
  • participation
  • social justice
  • South Africa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Knowledge in action : Negotiating power in development. / Keahey, Jennifer.

In: Action Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{70a971eb5cd44cb4894b2e3d618dd318,
title = "Knowledge in action: Negotiating power in development",
abstract = "How can sociopolitical theories inform participatory action research and what are the implications for development? I answer this question by reflecting on a research, training, and networking project that I conducted with small-scale rooibos tea farmers in postapartheid South Africa. My research team was comprised of community-based farmer leaders who sought representation in an industry marked by acute inequalities. Guided by Freire’s theory of conscientization, we employed a multi-paradigmatic framework to address questions pertaining to governance and identity. Theoretical training enabled my team to systematically interrogate differential power dynamics, illuminating the sociopolitical terrain. In return my co-investigators taught me to embrace a more situated understanding of power, helping us to shift the relations of research and practice. Yet we were unable to scale up outcomes due to material barriers, suggesting that knowledge alone is not power. Our experience illustrates the limitations of conscientization as a model for participatory development as well as its potential for delivering a multi-paradigmatic theory of social transformation.",
keywords = "conscientization, democratization, Development, participation, social justice, South Africa",
author = "Jennifer Keahey",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1476750319837328",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Action Research",
issn = "1476-7503",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge in action

T2 - Negotiating power in development

AU - Keahey, Jennifer

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - How can sociopolitical theories inform participatory action research and what are the implications for development? I answer this question by reflecting on a research, training, and networking project that I conducted with small-scale rooibos tea farmers in postapartheid South Africa. My research team was comprised of community-based farmer leaders who sought representation in an industry marked by acute inequalities. Guided by Freire’s theory of conscientization, we employed a multi-paradigmatic framework to address questions pertaining to governance and identity. Theoretical training enabled my team to systematically interrogate differential power dynamics, illuminating the sociopolitical terrain. In return my co-investigators taught me to embrace a more situated understanding of power, helping us to shift the relations of research and practice. Yet we were unable to scale up outcomes due to material barriers, suggesting that knowledge alone is not power. Our experience illustrates the limitations of conscientization as a model for participatory development as well as its potential for delivering a multi-paradigmatic theory of social transformation.

AB - How can sociopolitical theories inform participatory action research and what are the implications for development? I answer this question by reflecting on a research, training, and networking project that I conducted with small-scale rooibos tea farmers in postapartheid South Africa. My research team was comprised of community-based farmer leaders who sought representation in an industry marked by acute inequalities. Guided by Freire’s theory of conscientization, we employed a multi-paradigmatic framework to address questions pertaining to governance and identity. Theoretical training enabled my team to systematically interrogate differential power dynamics, illuminating the sociopolitical terrain. In return my co-investigators taught me to embrace a more situated understanding of power, helping us to shift the relations of research and practice. Yet we were unable to scale up outcomes due to material barriers, suggesting that knowledge alone is not power. Our experience illustrates the limitations of conscientization as a model for participatory development as well as its potential for delivering a multi-paradigmatic theory of social transformation.

KW - conscientization

KW - democratization

KW - Development

KW - participation

KW - social justice

KW - South Africa

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063571557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063571557&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1476750319837328

DO - 10.1177/1476750319837328

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85063571557

JO - Action Research

JF - Action Research

SN - 1476-7503

ER -