Justification and compensation: Rosier skies for the devalued victim

Douglas Kenrick, John W. Reich, Robert B. Cialdini

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Investigated whether compensation and derogation of an innocent victim are mutually exclusive alternatives. 136 female undergraduates observed a confederate receiving a series of ostensibly painful shocks under conditions previously found to induce high levels of derogation. Ss were given a chance to compensate the confederate either before or after rating her personality. Consistent with predictions, Ss who observed suffering compensated significantly more than controls, regardless of whether they had derogated the victim before being given the opportunity to help. Although derogation had no attenuating effect on helping, a prior opportunity to aid the victim tended to diminish derogation of her personality in a manner consistent with prior results. Implications for traditional hydraulic explanations of reactions to suffering are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)654-657
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
Volume34
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1976
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychological Stress
Personality
personality
Shock
rating

Keywords

  • compensation processes, female college students
  • exclusivity of justification &
  • victim derogation, subsequent opportunity to help victim &

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Justification and compensation : Rosier skies for the devalued victim. / Kenrick, Douglas; Reich, John W.; Cialdini, Robert B.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 34, No. 4, 10.1976, p. 654-657.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3b1d26857ec746749760b1f694aedf92,
title = "Justification and compensation: Rosier skies for the devalued victim",
abstract = "Investigated whether compensation and derogation of an innocent victim are mutually exclusive alternatives. 136 female undergraduates observed a confederate receiving a series of ostensibly painful shocks under conditions previously found to induce high levels of derogation. Ss were given a chance to compensate the confederate either before or after rating her personality. Consistent with predictions, Ss who observed suffering compensated significantly more than controls, regardless of whether they had derogated the victim before being given the opportunity to help. Although derogation had no attenuating effect on helping, a prior opportunity to aid the victim tended to diminish derogation of her personality in a manner consistent with prior results. Implications for traditional hydraulic explanations of reactions to suffering are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "compensation processes, female college students, exclusivity of justification &, victim derogation, subsequent opportunity to help victim &",
author = "Douglas Kenrick and Reich, {John W.} and Cialdini, {Robert B.}",
year = "1976",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.654",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "654--657",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Justification and compensation

T2 - Rosier skies for the devalued victim

AU - Kenrick, Douglas

AU - Reich, John W.

AU - Cialdini, Robert B.

PY - 1976/10

Y1 - 1976/10

N2 - Investigated whether compensation and derogation of an innocent victim are mutually exclusive alternatives. 136 female undergraduates observed a confederate receiving a series of ostensibly painful shocks under conditions previously found to induce high levels of derogation. Ss were given a chance to compensate the confederate either before or after rating her personality. Consistent with predictions, Ss who observed suffering compensated significantly more than controls, regardless of whether they had derogated the victim before being given the opportunity to help. Although derogation had no attenuating effect on helping, a prior opportunity to aid the victim tended to diminish derogation of her personality in a manner consistent with prior results. Implications for traditional hydraulic explanations of reactions to suffering are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - Investigated whether compensation and derogation of an innocent victim are mutually exclusive alternatives. 136 female undergraduates observed a confederate receiving a series of ostensibly painful shocks under conditions previously found to induce high levels of derogation. Ss were given a chance to compensate the confederate either before or after rating her personality. Consistent with predictions, Ss who observed suffering compensated significantly more than controls, regardless of whether they had derogated the victim before being given the opportunity to help. Although derogation had no attenuating effect on helping, a prior opportunity to aid the victim tended to diminish derogation of her personality in a manner consistent with prior results. Implications for traditional hydraulic explanations of reactions to suffering are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - compensation processes, female college students

KW - exclusivity of justification &

KW - victim derogation, subsequent opportunity to help victim &

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0009173537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0009173537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.654

DO - 10.1037/0022-3514.34.4.654

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0009173537

VL - 34

SP - 654

EP - 657

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 4

ER -