Abstract
This paper utilizes the groupthink framework (Janis, 1983) to analyze the jury deliberations in the trial of U.S. v. John DeLorean. Based on this analysis, an enhanced groupthink framework is presented that attempts to highlight a major factor that accounts for why defective decision-making does not occur in situations in which groupthink antecedent conditions are present that is, the presence of methodical decision-making procedures.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1077-1091 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Human Relations |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1992 |
Keywords
- decision-making
- DeLorean
- groupthink
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Management of Technology and Innovation
- Strategy and Management
- Social Sciences(all)
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Jury Deliberations in the Trial of U.S. v. John DeLorean: A Case Analysis of Groupthink Avoidance and an Enhanced Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Neck, C., & Moorhead, G. (1992). Jury Deliberations in the Trial of U.S. v. John DeLorean: A Case Analysis of Groupthink Avoidance and an Enhanced Framework. Human Relations, 45(10), 1077-1091. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204501004