Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation

Eric Welch, Darold Barnum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fossil-fuel based electricity generation produces the largest proportion of human-related carbon pollution in the United States. Hence, fuel choices by steam plants are key determinants of the industry's impact on national and global greenhouse gas emissions, and key foci for climate change policy. Yet, little research has been done to examine the economic and environmental tradeoffs among the different types of fuels that are used by these plants. This paper applies a Data Envelopment Analysis procedure that incorporates the materials balance principle to estimate the allocations of coal, gas and oil inputs that minimize carbon emissions and costs. Using EIA 906 and FERC 423 data, the paper estimates cost/carbon tradeoffs facing two sets of plants: those that use coal and gas inputs, and those that use coal, gas and oil inputs. Findings for our three-input sample show that there would be a 79% increase in cost for moving from the cost-efficient point to the carbon efficient point, while there would be a 38% increase in carbon for moving from the carbon efficient point to the cost-efficient point. These conclusions indicate that, in general, the gap between efficient cost and efficient environmental production is wide, and would require substantial policy intervention, technological change or market adjustment before it could be narrowed. However, our examination of individual plants shows that what is true in general is often not true for specific plants. Some plants that are currently less efficient than those on the production frontier could produce the same amount of electricity with less carbon output and less fuel input. Additionally, many plants on the production frontier could improve both cost and carbon efficiency by changing their mixture of fossil-fuel inputs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2336-2343
Number of pages8
JournalEcological Economics
Volume68
Issue number8-9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 15 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

electricity generation
carbon
cost
coal
fossil fuel
gas
data envelopment analysis
oil
technological change
carbon emission
analysis
Efficiency analysis
Carbon
Environmental efficiency
Electricity generation
Costs
electricity
greenhouse gas
pollution
climate change

Keywords

  • Carbon
  • Cost and environmental efficiency
  • Data envelopment analysis
  • DEA
  • Electricity generation
  • Greenhouse gas
  • Material balance principle

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Environmental Science(all)

Cite this

Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation. / Welch, Eric; Barnum, Darold.

In: Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 8-9, 15.06.2009, p. 2336-2343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ed9acd72e84f4081a862f8fc57948a35,
title = "Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation",
abstract = "Fossil-fuel based electricity generation produces the largest proportion of human-related carbon pollution in the United States. Hence, fuel choices by steam plants are key determinants of the industry's impact on national and global greenhouse gas emissions, and key foci for climate change policy. Yet, little research has been done to examine the economic and environmental tradeoffs among the different types of fuels that are used by these plants. This paper applies a Data Envelopment Analysis procedure that incorporates the materials balance principle to estimate the allocations of coal, gas and oil inputs that minimize carbon emissions and costs. Using EIA 906 and FERC 423 data, the paper estimates cost/carbon tradeoffs facing two sets of plants: those that use coal and gas inputs, and those that use coal, gas and oil inputs. Findings for our three-input sample show that there would be a 79{\%} increase in cost for moving from the cost-efficient point to the carbon efficient point, while there would be a 38{\%} increase in carbon for moving from the carbon efficient point to the cost-efficient point. These conclusions indicate that, in general, the gap between efficient cost and efficient environmental production is wide, and would require substantial policy intervention, technological change or market adjustment before it could be narrowed. However, our examination of individual plants shows that what is true in general is often not true for specific plants. Some plants that are currently less efficient than those on the production frontier could produce the same amount of electricity with less carbon output and less fuel input. Additionally, many plants on the production frontier could improve both cost and carbon efficiency by changing their mixture of fossil-fuel inputs.",
keywords = "Carbon, Cost and environmental efficiency, Data envelopment analysis, DEA, Electricity generation, Greenhouse gas, Material balance principle",
author = "Eric Welch and Darold Barnum",
year = "2009",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "2336--2343",
journal = "Ecological Economics",
issn = "0921-8009",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "8-9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Joint environmental and cost efficiency analysis of electricity generation

AU - Welch, Eric

AU - Barnum, Darold

PY - 2009/6/15

Y1 - 2009/6/15

N2 - Fossil-fuel based electricity generation produces the largest proportion of human-related carbon pollution in the United States. Hence, fuel choices by steam plants are key determinants of the industry's impact on national and global greenhouse gas emissions, and key foci for climate change policy. Yet, little research has been done to examine the economic and environmental tradeoffs among the different types of fuels that are used by these plants. This paper applies a Data Envelopment Analysis procedure that incorporates the materials balance principle to estimate the allocations of coal, gas and oil inputs that minimize carbon emissions and costs. Using EIA 906 and FERC 423 data, the paper estimates cost/carbon tradeoffs facing two sets of plants: those that use coal and gas inputs, and those that use coal, gas and oil inputs. Findings for our three-input sample show that there would be a 79% increase in cost for moving from the cost-efficient point to the carbon efficient point, while there would be a 38% increase in carbon for moving from the carbon efficient point to the cost-efficient point. These conclusions indicate that, in general, the gap between efficient cost and efficient environmental production is wide, and would require substantial policy intervention, technological change or market adjustment before it could be narrowed. However, our examination of individual plants shows that what is true in general is often not true for specific plants. Some plants that are currently less efficient than those on the production frontier could produce the same amount of electricity with less carbon output and less fuel input. Additionally, many plants on the production frontier could improve both cost and carbon efficiency by changing their mixture of fossil-fuel inputs.

AB - Fossil-fuel based electricity generation produces the largest proportion of human-related carbon pollution in the United States. Hence, fuel choices by steam plants are key determinants of the industry's impact on national and global greenhouse gas emissions, and key foci for climate change policy. Yet, little research has been done to examine the economic and environmental tradeoffs among the different types of fuels that are used by these plants. This paper applies a Data Envelopment Analysis procedure that incorporates the materials balance principle to estimate the allocations of coal, gas and oil inputs that minimize carbon emissions and costs. Using EIA 906 and FERC 423 data, the paper estimates cost/carbon tradeoffs facing two sets of plants: those that use coal and gas inputs, and those that use coal, gas and oil inputs. Findings for our three-input sample show that there would be a 79% increase in cost for moving from the cost-efficient point to the carbon efficient point, while there would be a 38% increase in carbon for moving from the carbon efficient point to the cost-efficient point. These conclusions indicate that, in general, the gap between efficient cost and efficient environmental production is wide, and would require substantial policy intervention, technological change or market adjustment before it could be narrowed. However, our examination of individual plants shows that what is true in general is often not true for specific plants. Some plants that are currently less efficient than those on the production frontier could produce the same amount of electricity with less carbon output and less fuel input. Additionally, many plants on the production frontier could improve both cost and carbon efficiency by changing their mixture of fossil-fuel inputs.

KW - Carbon

KW - Cost and environmental efficiency

KW - Data envelopment analysis

KW - DEA

KW - Electricity generation

KW - Greenhouse gas

KW - Material balance principle

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65749105258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65749105258&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.004

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65749105258

VL - 68

SP - 2336

EP - 2343

JO - Ecological Economics

JF - Ecological Economics

SN - 0921-8009

IS - 8-9

ER -