Abstract

Sedona, Arizona, an amenity town that trades on intangible quality-of-life attributes like spectacular scenery, the arts, and its nonmetropolitan location, has a conflict between low-wage employment catering to its tourist sector and expensive housing for its affluent residents. Many of those who work in Sedona do not live in the community. This study, based on a survey of 286 employees, shows that workers who live in Sedona do not have incomes that are significantly higher than commuters from the outside, but they live in housing that is almost twice as expensive. Employees who live in Sedona pay dearly for housing in order to be near jobs, natural beauty, and the cultural ambience of an amenity town. Commuters, on the other hand, incur high travel costs but enjoy cheaper housing and the lifestyle of small towns and rural areas. The emergence of amenity environments and long-distance commuting in Sedona is symbolic of the increased differentiation of nonmetropolitan landscapes. -Authors

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)12-20
Number of pages9
JournalProfessional Geographer
Volume45
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1993

Fingerprint

amenity
town
housing
commuter
employee
commuting
small town
low wage
beauty
quality of life
lifestyle
art
wage
rural area
tourist
travel
income
resident
worker
costs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Job-rich but housing-poor : the dilemma of a western amenity town. / Gober, Patricia; McHugh, Kevin; Leclerc, D.

In: Professional Geographer, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1993, p. 12-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gober, Patricia ; McHugh, Kevin ; Leclerc, D. / Job-rich but housing-poor : the dilemma of a western amenity town. In: Professional Geographer. 1993 ; Vol. 45, No. 1. pp. 12-20.
@article{69f06e619761476e982796a42c1779e2,
title = "Job-rich but housing-poor: the dilemma of a western amenity town",
abstract = "Sedona, Arizona, an amenity town that trades on intangible quality-of-life attributes like spectacular scenery, the arts, and its nonmetropolitan location, has a conflict between low-wage employment catering to its tourist sector and expensive housing for its affluent residents. Many of those who work in Sedona do not live in the community. This study, based on a survey of 286 employees, shows that workers who live in Sedona do not have incomes that are significantly higher than commuters from the outside, but they live in housing that is almost twice as expensive. Employees who live in Sedona pay dearly for housing in order to be near jobs, natural beauty, and the cultural ambience of an amenity town. Commuters, on the other hand, incur high travel costs but enjoy cheaper housing and the lifestyle of small towns and rural areas. The emergence of amenity environments and long-distance commuting in Sedona is symbolic of the increased differentiation of nonmetropolitan landscapes. -Authors",
author = "Patricia Gober and Kevin McHugh and D. Leclerc",
year = "1993",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "12--20",
journal = "Professional Geographer",
issn = "0033-0124",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Job-rich but housing-poor

T2 - the dilemma of a western amenity town

AU - Gober, Patricia

AU - McHugh, Kevin

AU - Leclerc, D.

PY - 1993

Y1 - 1993

N2 - Sedona, Arizona, an amenity town that trades on intangible quality-of-life attributes like spectacular scenery, the arts, and its nonmetropolitan location, has a conflict between low-wage employment catering to its tourist sector and expensive housing for its affluent residents. Many of those who work in Sedona do not live in the community. This study, based on a survey of 286 employees, shows that workers who live in Sedona do not have incomes that are significantly higher than commuters from the outside, but they live in housing that is almost twice as expensive. Employees who live in Sedona pay dearly for housing in order to be near jobs, natural beauty, and the cultural ambience of an amenity town. Commuters, on the other hand, incur high travel costs but enjoy cheaper housing and the lifestyle of small towns and rural areas. The emergence of amenity environments and long-distance commuting in Sedona is symbolic of the increased differentiation of nonmetropolitan landscapes. -Authors

AB - Sedona, Arizona, an amenity town that trades on intangible quality-of-life attributes like spectacular scenery, the arts, and its nonmetropolitan location, has a conflict between low-wage employment catering to its tourist sector and expensive housing for its affluent residents. Many of those who work in Sedona do not live in the community. This study, based on a survey of 286 employees, shows that workers who live in Sedona do not have incomes that are significantly higher than commuters from the outside, but they live in housing that is almost twice as expensive. Employees who live in Sedona pay dearly for housing in order to be near jobs, natural beauty, and the cultural ambience of an amenity town. Commuters, on the other hand, incur high travel costs but enjoy cheaper housing and the lifestyle of small towns and rural areas. The emergence of amenity environments and long-distance commuting in Sedona is symbolic of the increased differentiation of nonmetropolitan landscapes. -Authors

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027488140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027488140&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0027488140

VL - 45

SP - 12

EP - 20

JO - Professional Geographer

JF - Professional Geographer

SN - 0033-0124

IS - 1

ER -