It's good . . . but is it ART?

Paul A. Luce, Stephen Goldinger, Michael S. Vitevitch

Research output: Contribution to journalShort surveypeer-review

6 Scopus citations


We applaud Norris et al.'s critical review of the literature on lexical effects in phoneme decision making, and we sympathize with their attempt to reconcile autonomous models of word recognition with current research. However, we suggest that adaptive resonance theory (ART) may provide a coherent account of the data while preserving limited inhibitory feedback among certain lexical and sublexical representations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336
Number of pages1
JournalBehavioral and Brain Sciences
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Physiology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience


Dive into the research topics of 'It's good . . . but is it ART?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this