It's all relative: Concentrated disadvantage within and across neighborhoods and communities, and the consequences for neighborhood crime

Alyssa Chamberlain, John R. Hipp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Prior studies have largely been unable to account for how variations in inequality across larger areas might impact crime rates in neighborhoods. We examine this broader context both in terms of the spatial area surrounding neighborhoods as well as the larger, city-level context. Although social disorganization, opportunity and relative deprivation theories are typically used to explain variations in neighborhood crime, these theories make differing predictions about crime when the broader areas that neighborhoods are embedded in are taken into account. Methods: We use data from the National Neighborhood Crime Study for 7956 neighborhoods in 79 cities. Multi-level models with spatial effects are estimated to explain the relationship between crime and city and neighborhood social and economic resources. Results: Disadvantage in the focal neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods increase neighborhood violent crime, consistent with social disorganization theory. However, relative deprivation provides a more robust explanation for understanding variation in property crime, as the difference in disadvantage between a neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods (or the broader community) explains higher levels of property crime. Conclusions: Criminologists need to account for the larger context of nearby neighborhoods, as well as the broader city, when understanding the effect of relative deprivation on neighborhood-level property crime rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number1367
Pages (from-to)431-443
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Criminal Justice
Volume43
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Fingerprint

Crime
offense
community
deprivation
Anomie
crime rate
social opportunity
violent crime
large city

Keywords

  • Crime
  • Inequality
  • Macro-level effects
  • Neighborhoods
  • Spatial effects

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{cf42073c58474fb4bc485d2956810676,
title = "It's all relative: Concentrated disadvantage within and across neighborhoods and communities, and the consequences for neighborhood crime",
abstract = "Purpose: Prior studies have largely been unable to account for how variations in inequality across larger areas might impact crime rates in neighborhoods. We examine this broader context both in terms of the spatial area surrounding neighborhoods as well as the larger, city-level context. Although social disorganization, opportunity and relative deprivation theories are typically used to explain variations in neighborhood crime, these theories make differing predictions about crime when the broader areas that neighborhoods are embedded in are taken into account. Methods: We use data from the National Neighborhood Crime Study for 7956 neighborhoods in 79 cities. Multi-level models with spatial effects are estimated to explain the relationship between crime and city and neighborhood social and economic resources. Results: Disadvantage in the focal neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods increase neighborhood violent crime, consistent with social disorganization theory. However, relative deprivation provides a more robust explanation for understanding variation in property crime, as the difference in disadvantage between a neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods (or the broader community) explains higher levels of property crime. Conclusions: Criminologists need to account for the larger context of nearby neighborhoods, as well as the broader city, when understanding the effect of relative deprivation on neighborhood-level property crime rates.",
keywords = "Crime, Inequality, Macro-level effects, Neighborhoods, Spatial effects",
author = "Alyssa Chamberlain and Hipp, {John R.}",
year = "2015",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.08.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "431--443",
journal = "Journal of Criminal Justice",
issn = "0047-2352",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - It's all relative

T2 - Concentrated disadvantage within and across neighborhoods and communities, and the consequences for neighborhood crime

AU - Chamberlain, Alyssa

AU - Hipp, John R.

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - Purpose: Prior studies have largely been unable to account for how variations in inequality across larger areas might impact crime rates in neighborhoods. We examine this broader context both in terms of the spatial area surrounding neighborhoods as well as the larger, city-level context. Although social disorganization, opportunity and relative deprivation theories are typically used to explain variations in neighborhood crime, these theories make differing predictions about crime when the broader areas that neighborhoods are embedded in are taken into account. Methods: We use data from the National Neighborhood Crime Study for 7956 neighborhoods in 79 cities. Multi-level models with spatial effects are estimated to explain the relationship between crime and city and neighborhood social and economic resources. Results: Disadvantage in the focal neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods increase neighborhood violent crime, consistent with social disorganization theory. However, relative deprivation provides a more robust explanation for understanding variation in property crime, as the difference in disadvantage between a neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods (or the broader community) explains higher levels of property crime. Conclusions: Criminologists need to account for the larger context of nearby neighborhoods, as well as the broader city, when understanding the effect of relative deprivation on neighborhood-level property crime rates.

AB - Purpose: Prior studies have largely been unable to account for how variations in inequality across larger areas might impact crime rates in neighborhoods. We examine this broader context both in terms of the spatial area surrounding neighborhoods as well as the larger, city-level context. Although social disorganization, opportunity and relative deprivation theories are typically used to explain variations in neighborhood crime, these theories make differing predictions about crime when the broader areas that neighborhoods are embedded in are taken into account. Methods: We use data from the National Neighborhood Crime Study for 7956 neighborhoods in 79 cities. Multi-level models with spatial effects are estimated to explain the relationship between crime and city and neighborhood social and economic resources. Results: Disadvantage in the focal neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods increase neighborhood violent crime, consistent with social disorganization theory. However, relative deprivation provides a more robust explanation for understanding variation in property crime, as the difference in disadvantage between a neighborhood and nearby neighborhoods (or the broader community) explains higher levels of property crime. Conclusions: Criminologists need to account for the larger context of nearby neighborhoods, as well as the broader city, when understanding the effect of relative deprivation on neighborhood-level property crime rates.

KW - Crime

KW - Inequality

KW - Macro-level effects

KW - Neighborhoods

KW - Spatial effects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942233560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84942233560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.08.004

DO - 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2015.08.004

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942233560

VL - 43

SP - 431

EP - 443

JO - Journal of Criminal Justice

JF - Journal of Criminal Justice

SN - 0047-2352

IS - 6

M1 - 1367

ER -